What's new

Is Pakistan-India enmity real or is it a deception to fight bigger countries like US, China & Russia

It seems there's been some behind-the-scene settlement hidden from public. The thinking is probably like, "Let there be status quo for the time being. In due course of time with globalization and movement of people, the borders will become so irrelevant that future generations would wonder what was the dispute about?"

- PRTP GWD

That's unachievable.

Pakistan will always be a fort.

The status quo is changing day by day. You just in lockdown and not finding out about it
 
.
I would love to believe that. But there are generations of Pakistanis who condone their military’s use of violence or any means to try to get physical control over IOK.


While peaceful, tolerant, law bidding hindus have no wrong....:o:

they have their interest with that group which controls power in pakistan


Looking at you people.... this applies more on you then us.

Exactly...This is why, i always argue with people who says, due to BJP/Modi, India and Pakistan are not in good terms...These statements are just lame execuses...And these excuses provide enough oppertunity for BJP to stake its claim to power..

BJP is a major force in Indian politics is since 2000. But India and Pak are killing each other since last 70 year...


I agree.. the problem is with hindus of India that never accepted Pakistan since day one.. and have done everything to dismantle it.
 
.
While peaceful, tolerant, law bidding hindus have no wrong....:o:




Looking at you people.... this applies more on you then us.

India has never used violence or any objectionable means to get physical control over Azad Kashmir.
 
.
s. PMIK may be corrupt and he is no different from other politicians


and you are saying this based on what?...

even the shamelessly dishonest India back Nawaz sharif could not even produce a ounce of corruption..

India has never used violence or any objectionable means to get physical control over Azad Kashmir.

@ lun

didn't u use para troopers to capture Kashmir?...


lol

Siachen 1984?... where do think that is ?.. north africa?..lol

and yes you generally have been unsuccessful in Azad Kashmir.. as Pakistan Army is there and hand your rear end on a plate... be it 1965, Kargil, or 27 Feb when the events of the airforce over shadowed BAT counter strikes on Indian positions.
 
.
Is Pakistan-India enmity real or is it a deception in order to fight powerful countries like US, China & Russia?

If it's real why has the Kashmir dispute been unresolved for 73 years? If the belligerence was real, there would have been a fight to the finish long ago and one side would have been vanquished and shattered completely.

Thousands of people have died in wars on either side. So many deaths can't be faked. But the deaths would have happened anyways because the energy to kill in wars would have found other forms like Naxalism in India and TTP in Pakistan. The internal unrest was briefly channeled towards external parties during wars.

Both India and Pakistan face serious threats from big and powerful countries like US, China and Russia. There are strong reasons for the two countries to join forces and cooperate to protect themselves from the three superpowers.

So the mystery remains. Is Indo-Pak enmity real or is it a facade classified by the intelligence agencies of the two countries?

- PRTP GWD

No it is very much real inspite of good friendship between the citizen of both the nations.
 
. .
and you are saying this based on what?...

even the shamelessly dishonest India back Nawaz sharif could not even produce a ounce of corruption..



@ lun

didn't u use para troopers to capture Kashmir?...


lol

Siachen 1984?... where do think that is ?.. north africa?..lol

and yes you generally have been unsuccessful in Azad Kashmir.. as Pakistan Army is there and hand your rear end on a plate... be it 1965, Kargil, or 27 Feb when the events of the airforce over shadowed BAT counter strikes on Indian positions.

LOL

India has never tried to physically alter the LOC unlike Pak in 1965 and Kargil fiasco.

Why siachen should belong to Pak? If Pak had moved into siachen earlier than India, India would have been forced to accept it. That was gross incompetence from PA despite making a move on siachen first.

India bombed Pak sovereign territory on 26th not AK.
 
.
India has never tried to physically alter the LOC unlike Pak in 1965 and Kargil fiasco

@lun

really?... you really know nothing..

Kargil was Pakistani land of AK India refused to hand back after 1971 war.

Kargil was a political fiasco thanks to Nawaz... other wise the Pindi boys gave you a thrashing for 11 weeks you never forgot.
 
Last edited:
.
it looks so . there are some limitations for pakistan too .
The middle ground/compromise between East and West Europe was socialism, what will be the middle ground between Hindus and Muslims be if there is any?
 
.
LOL

India has never tried to physically alter the LOC unlike Pak in 1965 and Kargil fiasco.

Why siachen should belong to Pak? If Pak had moved into siachen earlier than India, India would have been forced to accept it. That was gross incompetence from PA despite making a move on siachen first.

India bombed Pak sovereign territory on 26th not AK.

Will a thief give his ill gotten gains, never? It's confiscated from him normally with a fight.
 
.
No it is very much real inspite of good friendship between the citizen of both the nations.
Are you the same Surya who had this pic in his dp saying, "Am I the only one who is polite around here?"

- PRTP GWD
 
. . .
, what will be the middle ground between Hindus and Muslims be if there is any?


hindus need to renounce their religion. ...

Your statement applies to Pak also.


yes like India backed Nawaz who refuses to return the looted money..

I guess we all know now where he gets his DNA.



then u you should know this statictic and would understand why such things happen.

90 percent of Indians are idiots: Justice Markandey Katju
www.ndtv.com › India

Dec 8, 2012 - At least 90 percent of Indians are "idiots"
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom