randomradio
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2016
- Messages
- 6,974
- Reaction score
- -17
- Country
- Location
Why go for the F-16 when LCA was touted as the replacement for many obsolete fighters in the IAF? It only means one thing. The LCA just isn't up to the mark.
There are other single engine fighter options out there that are more potent and not at the end of life. India even operates one. India is in for a rude awakening. A logistical nightmare. The familiarity aspect will be a huge negative. This will take at the very least a decade to properly materialize. India is starting from scratch on the F-16.
LCA is also going to be bought in equal numbers as other jets.
India has operated far more jets in the past than what's been planned.
India has seemingly bowed under US pressure. There is no other valid explanation for this deal. India has always opposed the F-16 deal when the Americans were touting it like the next thing since sliced bread.
The deal is only between LM and Tata. IAF is yet to select it.