What's new

Is India one people?

Arachosia, Gedrosia are the two ancient names of the western halfs of Pak in Ancient Greek...The correct self-identifier of Pakistan should be Gandhara....even the name Pakistan sounds hollow as its an acronym...the founding fathers of Pakistan really botched up with the nomenclature

Embassy_of_Megasthenes.jpg




Gedrosia-Map-Route-of-Alexander-1823-Lucas.png




racially Historical India is seven groups...Linguistically 5 groups...no matter which way you slice...you will get 7 countries on the subcontinent....we have on the present day seven countries on the subcontinent

Maldives, SL,BD,Bhutan,Nepal,India,Pakistan

South_Asian_Language_Families.png


India1909PrevailingRaces.JPG


And india was enforced on you by your gora masters. And like a loyal gora slaves you guys chose to carrry on their legacy.
 
And india was enforced on you by your gora masters. And like a loyal gora slaves you guys chose to carrry on their legacy.

India is called different names in different languages like Indien in German etc etc..

We also have Bharat..and it's on our passport.....


You guys botched it up majorly in 1947 when you didnot ask for self determination of all Indus peoples from the greater British India


You guys imported millions and millions of us "Ganga Pajeets" in 1947 and raped,killed, drove away your own racial brethren



You cannot now pretend to speak for the Indus race, and Indus Nationalism when this was clearly not the basis of Pakistan in 1947
 
Last edited:
@T-SaGe I think your indulging in nostalgia if you think your going to find Turkic peoples in India. At 1.4 billion any trace will have bee wiped out. Even in Pakistan which is adjacent to Turkish historical homelands of Central Asia has limited Turkish print. However Hazara region of Pakistan has traces. The Turks have been assimilated into the local population which is Pakhtun and Hindkowans. But the Turkish presence can still be seen on faces of some people in the region.

 
yindoo philosophy anything white masters controlled belongs to yindoo boys until they get their arses handed to them by Muslims and china!

hindus themselves are not one so how can india be one?
 
yindoo philosophy anything white masters controlled belongs to yindoo boys until they get their arses handed to them by Muslims and china!

hindus themselves are not one so how can india be one?


India is one because enough people of India decide to keep it as one..as long as the energy to keep India as one exceeds the energy to split India up, India will continue to exist in the present configuration


and by the way muslims and atheist Chinese will fight eachother long before they team up to attack India......look at Xinjiang
 
Last edited:
India is called different names in different languages like Indien in German etc etc..

We also have Bharat..and it's on our passport.....


You guys botched it up majorly in 1947 when you didnot ask for self determination of all Indus peoples from the greater British India


You guys imported millions and millions of us "Ganga Pajeets" in 1947 and raped,killed, drove away your own racial brethren



You cannot now pretend to speak for the Indus race, and Indus Nationalism when this was clearly not the basis of Pakistan in 1947

Nice cover up but the fact remains the name India was enforced on you people by invaders. Your country chose to go with India and Bharat name is rarely used. During cricket matches Indians mostly shout India name and same goes with your military which again mostly go with the name India and Bharat is just a secondary name.
The reason why Bombay name was changed to Mumbai is because it was named by British empire yet you people have no problem with keeping the name India which you people mostly use.
For example, China name was adopted by the west because of "ease of pronunciation" not because China was invaded by foreigner forces and they named the region like a slave master.
India name represent Slave-master relationship.
Your culture originates from what is today Pakistan but we are so glad that our ancestors realized that how stupid of religion it was and they quickly adopted Islam.
 
Nice cover up but the fact remains the name India was enforced on you people by invaders. Your country chose to go with India and Bharat name is rarely used. During cricket matches Indians mostly shout India name and same goes with your military which again mostly go with the name India and Bharat is just a secondary name.
The reason why Bombay name was changed to Mumbai is because it was named by British empire yet you people have no problem with keeping the name India which you people mostly use.
For example, China name was adopted by the west because of "ease of pronunciation" not because China was invaded by foreigner forces and they named the region like a slave master.
India name represent Slave-master relationship.
Your culture originates from what is today Pakistan but we are so glad that our ancestors realized that how stupid of religion it was and they quickly adopted Islam.



Our culture originates in Rakhgarhi, Lothal, SUrkotada, Sanauli


We have nothing to do with you
 
India is one because enough people of India decide to keep it as one..as long as the energy to keep India as one exceeds the energy to split India up, India will continue to exist in the present configuration


and by the way muslims and atheist Chinese will fight eachother long before they team up to attack India......look at Xinjiang
HAHAHA India is just a artificial name which was enforced on you people by your British masters and if people are given choices India would split up in million pieces.
The only reason why India is intact is because of its brutal regime which has by forced kept different kind of people under one flag.
Our culture originates in Rakhgarhi, Lothal, SUrkotada, Sanauli


We have nothing to do with you

LOL your culture originates from hinduism which itself originates from indus civilization and Indus is in Pakistan.
 
HAHAHA India is just a artificial name which was enforced on you people by your British masters and if people are given choices India would split up in million pieces.
The only reason why India is intact is because of its brutal regime which has by forced kept different kind of people under one flag.


LOL your culture originates from hinduism which itself originates from indus civilization and Indus is in Pakistan.


The Rig Veda was composed by the Bharata tribe with its seat in Eastern Punjab and Haryana...our hero Sudas crossed from East to West to defeat the Ten King alliance in modern day Pakistan.

On top of that our history is rooted in Lothal, Rakhagarhi

as well as Buddhism and Jainism ...donot blabber what you have no idea about
 
The Rig Veda was composed by the Bharata tribe with its seat in Eastern Punjab and Haryana...our hero Sudas crossed from East to West to defeat the Ten King alliance in modern day Pakistan.

On top of that our history is rooted in Lothal, Rakhagarhi

as well as Buddhism and Jainism ...donot blabber what you have no idea about

So hindusim does not originates from indus civilization? Lol
 
India is a multiethnic empire held together by force.

Are Gujaratis or Tamils really "Indian"?

That's like asking whether "Indians" were British when they were part of the British Empire.
 
Where is the earliest origins of hinduism. It cant be multiple places at the same time. Name the first place.


Dholavira, Rakhagarhi, Lothal also if you want to take it further back, then our cave paintings in Central India..we have been in tune with Nature and have respected the Divine aspect of Nature since long....(I personally am a non-theist though)
 
Last edited:
The Rig Veda was composed by the Bharata tribe with its seat in Eastern Punjab and Haryana...our hero Sudas crossed from East to West to defeat the Ten King alliance in modern day Pakistan.

On top of that our history is rooted in Lothal, Rakhagarhi

as well as Buddhism and Jainism ...donot blabber what you have no idea about
I'm afraid you've fallen for some intense propaganda.


"This view propagated the idea that this ‘indigenously developed’ culture, along with Sanskrit, also spread westwards at the same time.

How valid is this ‘Out of India’ argument? Is there any evidence to substantiate its theory of outward migration?

Subclade R1a1a

Older studies based on mitochondrial DNA studies tell a different story: that outward migration did not happen. Instead, they indicate that some of the social groups distributed in various parts of India share a common genetic ancestral lineage (designated haplogroup R1a1a) with eastern Europeans. The new archeogenetic papers suggest that haplogroup R1a1a mutated out of haplogroup R1a in the Eurasian Steppe about 14,000 years ago. Thus, these studies support the ‘Out of the East European Steppes’ theory. It follows from this that the original form of Indo-European languages was first spoken in eastern Europe, the ‘original’ homeland.

About 10,000 years ago, a portion of the people that shared the genomic subclade R1a1a left their homeland and moved east towards the Caspian grasslands, where they tamed horses, goats and dogs and learned to build horse-drawn chariots, essential for a nomadic life. Around 1,900 BC, these people broke up into three groups. One group proceeded westward, to Anatolia, part of the fertile crescent. The second moved into what is now western Mongolia. The third group migrated southwards, into a region known to the Greeks as Bactra.

Subsequently, the third group divided into two subgroups: one moved into what is now Iran, and the other into India. Those who entered India, around 1,500 BC, established the dominant civilisation in western Punjab. By then, much of the older Harappan settlers had either become marginalised or had moved to the south and central India, and even to parts of Balochistan. The newly settled people, the so-called ‘Aryans’ themselves, were not builders like the Harappans but are likelier to have been better story-tellers."

The story-telling talent holds true to this day..
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom