Is BD is a secular state ?

[queerbait]

So let’s get this straight.

It is ok for India to be a religious country.

But not acceptable for BD to be a religious country.

Indian logic.

India is a secular country according to our constitution. Please be informed

 

[Michael Corleone]

Yes I am biased!!!
But you should show a Hindu living in Bangladesh saying similar words and living a king size life. Surely then I will accept your words.

We don't have inferiority complex working in our country like india.... at least not religion wise....

 

[itsanufy]

We don't have inferiority complex working in our country like india.... at least not religion wise....

It is useless to argue with you. But wish you all the best.

 

[itsanufy]

Yes, I have read similar 1948 accounts of persecution in Hyderabad. The Muslims certainly have done it. But, it is difficult to understand who was the mastermind behind this. I wonder if the Indian Congress or the Delhi government itself was not behind it. Note that the persecution of the Hindus by the Razakars was needed as a pretext for Delhi to attack Hyderabad and expel Nizam. I am not sure, though.

Its very interesting fact. Razakars was mastermind of Nawab of Chhatari and was orchestrated by Kasim Razvi. They according to the wish of Nizam wanted to aced Hyderabad to Pakistan and all this Razakars came in place. This is a long story in short.
The Nizam of Hyderabad, in his radio speech on 23 September 1948, said "In November last, a small group which had organized a quasi-military organization surrounded the homes of my Prime Minister, the Nawab of Chhatari, in whose wisdom I had complete confidence, and of Sir Walter Monkton, my constitutional Adviser, by duress compelled the Nawab and other trusted ministers to resign and forced the Laik Ali Ministry on me. This group headed by Kasim Razvi had no stake in the country or any record of service behind it. By methods reminiscent of Hitlerite Germany it took possession of the State, spread terror ... and rendered me completely helpless."

 

[bluesky]

Its very interesting fact. Razakars was mastermind of Nawab of Chhatari and was orchestrated by Kasim Razvi. They according to the wish of Nizam wanted to aced Hyderabad to Pakistan and all this Razakars came in place. This is a long story in short.
The Nizam of Hyderabad, in his radio speech on 23 September 1948, said "In November last, a small group which had organized a quasi-military organization surrounded the homes of my Prime Minister, the Nawab of Chhatari, in whose wisdom I had complete confidence, and of Sir Walter Monkton, my constitutional Adviser, by duress compelled the Nawab and other trusted ministers to resign and forced the Laik Ali Ministry on me. This group headed by Kasim Razvi had no stake in the country or any record of service behind it. By methods reminiscent of Hitlerite Germany it took possession of the State, spread terror ... and rendered me completely helpless."

I am not very sure, but the statement of Nizam may be translated as the persecution of the Hindus was not his order. It was Kasim Rizvi who organized the quasi-military group and orchestrated the Hindu persecution. But, again I wonder if he was not supported by Nizam or his PM, who was behind him. so, it is possible that Delhi might have been behind this persecution, but I am not sure.

There was a rumor that Nizam wanted his state to join Pakistan. But, I have not heard of any statement he directly made to express this by himself. Could it be that he wanted Hyderabad to remain independent of both India and Pakistan?

 

[Buddhistforlife]

Yes.

They rejected and rebelled openly against islam in 1971 to become a secular state.

Secularism is better than barbaric sharia law.

 

[El Sidd]

Secularism is better than barbaric sharia law.

Lets agree to disagree?
Or do you intend to shove your beliefs down my throat like a secular evangelist?

 

[Buddhistforlife]

Lets agree to disagree?
Or do you intend to shove your beliefs down my throat like a secular evangelist?

I dont get it if muslims can impose sharia law and persecute non muslim minorities in their lands then what is wrong in Myanmar, India or European countries killing and persecuting muslims in their land.

 

[El Sidd]

I dont get it if muslims can impose sharia law and persecute non muslim minorities in their lands then what is wrong in Myanmar, India or European countries killing and persecuting muslims in their land.

Comment on it when it happens in Nepal.

People keep getting abducted there and government has no writ and no motivation towards betterment of the nepalese

 

[Michael Corleone]

It is useless to argue with you. But wish you all the best.

that's the difference between you and me, you're interested in stubborn arguments and living in delusion.... i'm interested in facts and debates