What's new

Is BD is a secular state ?

.
Sheikh Hasina is not a hindu or an atheist as claimed by Radical Islamists. Islamists call her hindu/atheist because she does not support their agenda of turning Bangladesh into a Taliban state. Sheikh Hasina protects Hindu, Christian and Buddhist minorities which Islamists don't like because most Islamists of Bangladesh with Pakistani collaboration wants to turn Bangladesh into Banglastan and they are openly threatening to kill and murder all minority people to achieve their dream. @Pan-Islamic-Pakistan

Don’t talk about Islam when you don’t have knowledge.
 
.
In Bangladesh secular Awami league have always protected the minority communities while Islamic groups and Pro Pakistan groups have always persecuted and attacked minorities in Bangladesh.

show me references, that only BAL is SAVING !!! So called minorities. What is the proof dude ? In the terms of BAL , how many minorities ( Non-muslims) killed. count that - Where Muslims are not safe in BD, now u r talking about sefty of minorities? And if you do blv in Democracy - so why u r talking about Minorities !!!! Isn't it is funny ?

BNP, Jamaat e Islami and other Islamic groups in Bangladesh are known for carrying out horrible persecution against minorities especially Hindus. They destroy hindu temples, kills innocent hindus, rapes hindu women etc. Thousands of Hindus and tribal Buddhists were forced out of the country and their lands got grabbed by Islamic groups in Bangladesh including BNP. When BNP and Islamic groups comes to power, minorities in Bangladesh becomes economically backward as they dont get any jobs or can do business because Islamic groups put restrictions on minorities. I think Hasina is the best leader for Bangladeshi people.

ow really ? If muslim used the word violence do you think only 8 % Hindus could able to stay in BD? why u don't see to the India ? And Islamic parties ? Which islamic party killed your so called Hindus ? Its political matter , yah some killed by , crime organized by whom ?

Yes Shanti Chukti was necessaty because without Shanti Chukti the tribal Chakma buddhists would have been deprived of many facilities they are enjoying today. However BNP and Jamaat e Islami have opposed it as they dont want minorities to prosper in Bangladesh.


Yes , Santi Cukti is needed for India not for BD. We know indian conspiracy about the hill area. Your statement proved that - what we thought. state inside another state - u r supporting the wild theory .

Different time different governance system...

Policy never change - Just its matter of 19-20. Conservative and liberal. that s it .
 
.
show me references, that only BAL is SAVING !!! So called minorities. What is the proof dude ? In the terms of BAL , how many minorities ( Non-muslims) killed. count that - Where Muslims are not safe in BD, now u r talking about sefty of minorities? And if you do blv in Democracy - so why u r talking about Minorities !!!! Isn't it is funny ?



ow really ? If muslim used the word violence do you think only 8 % Hindus could able to stay in BD? why u don't see to the India ? And Islamic parties ? Which islamic party killed your so called Hindus ? Its political matter , yah some killed by , crime organized by whom ?




Yes , Santi Cukti is needed for India not for BD. We know indian conspiracy about the hill area. Your statement proved that - what we thought. state inside another state - u r supporting the wild theory .



Policy never change - Just its matter of 19-20. Conservative and liberal. that s it .
'And if you do blv in Democracy - so why u r talking about Minorities !!!! Isn't it is funny'

So if I am democratic can't i talk about the poor condition of minorities in Bangladesh?
 
.
'And if you do blv in Democracy - so why u r talking about Minorities !!!! Isn't it is funny'

So if I am democratic can't i talk about the poor condition of minorities in Bangladesh?

Ohhh my dear ---- go to the root of the prob . try to understand dear.
 
. . . .
Yes.

They rejected and rebelled openly against islam in 1971 to become a secular state.
 
.
Yes.

They rejected and rebelled openly against islam in 1971 to become a secular state.

Adding -- Mujib was tried to establish a Communist Ruling system - When zia came and Democracy started by him -- He injected the poison ---
 
.
Adding -- Mujib was tried to establish a Communist Ruling system - When zia came and Democracy started by him -- He injected the poison ---

Do you think i care about rebels and mercenaries?
 
. . .
Yes.

They rejected and rebelled openly against islam in 1971 to become a secular state.

Bangladeshis indirectly, not openly rebelled against radical Islam in 1971 which was injected by Pakistani military backed Govt. and local Islamist parties.

The present scenario is entirely different. Bangladeshis now embrace Islam in any form and want to view Bangladesh as ideal Islamic nation on earth but not without 1971 liberation history. Bangladeshis are now aiming to build a nation with Islam as its core principle and also with the history of 1971 war. It is viewed as war between Liberal Islam vs radical Islam.
 
.
Bangladeshis indirectly, not openly rebelled against radical Islam in 1971 which was injected by Pakistani military backed Govt. and local Islamist parties.

The present scenario is entirely different. Bangladeshis now embrace Islam in any form and want to view Bangladesh as ideal Islamic nation on earth but not without 1971 liberation history. Bangladeshis are now aiming to build a nation with Islam as its core principle and also with the history of 1971 war. It is viewed as war between Liberal Islam vs radical Islam.

Lol
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom