What's new

Is Bangladesh moving towards one-party state?

The Ronin

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 24, 2017
Messages
3,386
Reaction score
0
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
The controversial jailing of ex-PM Zia and persecution of dissent raises fears months ahead of general elections.

aa67554009394681954fde152a43f063_18.jpg


Dhaka, Bangladesh - The controversial jailing of former Bangladesh Prime Minister Khaleda Zia and the state persecution of dissent have raised fears that the next parliamentary election could turn into a violent sham.

Fear of a 2014 repeat, when the parliamentary elections were boycotted by almost all the opposition parties and marred by large-scale violence and killings, runs high in Bangladesh as the ruling Awami League (AL) government faces allegations of a concerted persecution of its opponents.

READ MORE
End disappearances and extrajudicial killings: HRW
While activists and political workers opposed to the government live under an increasing threat of being jailed or worse, there is widespread concern, even among the common people, over what lies ahead in an election year.

Parliamentary elections in Bangladesh are due by December.

It's a government and a political party which believe that they are not accountable to anyone. It's a dangerous sign in a democracy.
ASIF NAZRUL, PROFESSOR DHAKA UNIVERSITY

Nadia Tabassum Khan, an employee of a multinational company in Dhaka, told Al Jazeera that the Awami League has suppressed all dissent to such an extent that she doesn't think "anyone would dare to protest against them".

Hasan Habib is the owner of a real estate company based in Dhaka. He says "the enmities between the two leading political parties" have made the voting process "a nearly impossible task".

Enforced disappearance
Since the controversial imprisonment of Bangladesh's opposition leader and two-time Prime Minister Khaleda Zia last month, it is becoming increasingly difficult for the government of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to reject allegations of turning into an authoritarian regime.

Zia was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years on February 8 for embezzling 21 million takas ($253,000) in foreign donations meant for a charity named after former President Ziaur Rahman, Zia's husband. Her elder son and heir apparent, Tarique Rahman, and four others were also sentenced to 10 years in prison.

Nearly a month later Zia was granted bail. However, the country's Supreme Court stayed the bail within a week "without assigning any reason", effectively putting the 72-year-old leader in jail till May 8, when the next hearing on her bail application is expected to be held.

The arrest and subsequent imprisonment of the former prime minister, which Zia's Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) called the Hasina government's conspiracy to keep the opposition party out of politics, led to widespread violence in cities across Bangladesh, with BNP supporters clashing with police and ruling party members.

Police records say nearly 300 leaders and supporters of the BNP were arrested on the day of Zia's verdict. Since February this year, over 3,000 members of the opposition party have been put behind bars.

Hasina and Zia - both women are related to former Bangladesh leaders - have dominated the country's politics for more than two decades. In fact, the bitter rivalry between the country's most powerful "begums" has pushed Bangladesh in the grip of violence and unrest for years.

The BNP alleges that over 500 of its supporters have been killed and nearly 750 "abducted" by the police and thrown in various jails since 2014. The party claims around 150 more of its missing workers have either been killed in extrajudicial encounters or have been forced to disappear.

The main opposition party says it has not yet decided on a plan of action following the Zia verdict. The party has largely resorted to non-violent protests against the crackdown on it. However, as permissions for political rallies are denied, many in the BNP are losing patience with the strategy of holding peaceful protests.

The spectre of large-scale violence now threatens to destabilise the parliamentary elections in the country scheduled to be held in December this year.

Last week, German think-tank Bertelsmann Foundation released a report that said the country is now under an autocratic rule. Listing 13 countries "where the political situation has become significantly worse", the report said in five of these countries, namely Bangladesh, Lebanon, Mozambique, Nicaragua and Uganda, "democracy has been gradually undermined for years" and that they no longer meet its minimum standards.

Scepticism over elections
Political commentators in and outside Bangladesh concur with such a damning reading of the Hasina government, especially in the context of the state conducting free and fair elections.

In 2014, Hasina had returned to power for a second consecutive term through a controversial and bloody national election, which was boycotted by the centre-right BNP.

In her 10-year tenure as the prime minister of Bangladesh, Hasina has been accused of using the state's law enforcement apparatus as well as the judiciary to suppress the voice of the opposition.

Rights groups, both local and international, have reported a deteriorating human rights situation in Bangladesh in recent years.

Bangladesh rights group Ain o Salish Kendra (ASK) says as many as 519 people have allegedly fallen victim to enforced disappearances since 2010 while over 300 people are still missing.

"My father has been missing since December 4," said Shabnam Zaman, daughter of former Bangladesh ambassador to Qatar and Vietnam, Maroof Zaman, who was accused of sharing "anti-government posts" on social media and was allegedly scooped up by unidentified abductors in Dhaka in December last year.

"The police stopped their investigation when they came to know about the circumstances surrounding the disappearance of my father," she told Al Jazeera.

On March 13 this year, Jakir Hossain, a leader of Chatra Dal, which is the BNP's student wing, died in police custody after he was allegedly tortured by the police.

A Human Rights Watch (HRW) report last year said the Bangladesh government had secretly arrested hundreds of people, mostly activists and political figures, opposed to the Hasina government.

Complete freedom, claims government
The Awami League government, however, dismissed the allegations.

When Al Jazeera asked Information Minister Hasanul Haq Inu about the political persecution as alleged by the BNP, he said the opposition party enjoys "complete freedom" in its exercise of the democratic rights.

"But that doesn't mean the law enforcers will not check their activities which may harm the common people," Inu said.

When reminded of the controversial 2014 national election, which the BNP had boycotted and which has renewed fears of a similar undermining of the electoral process in Bangladesh, Inu said; "The 2014 election was held as per the constitution. The BNP's decision of boycotting it was a political decision and they now realise it was a wrong decision on their part."

The Bangladesh minister also rejected the German think-tank report that called the AL government autocratic as "intentional" and "baseless". He said he was eager to know what data Bertelsmann Stiftung had looked at.

"All the arms of a true democracy, including the judiciary and media, are fully independent in Bangladesh," Inu said.

Senior Awami League leader Faruq Khan told Al Jazeera the rights groups' accusation of human rights violation in Bangladesh is not true.

"Our government has, in fact, set up an example before the world of upholding human rights by giving refuge to a million Rohingya refugees who have fled Myanmar," Khan said.

'Dangerous sign in a democracy'
But the experts and rights activists are not buying the government's defence.

Meenakshi Ganguly, who is the South Asia Director of Human Rights Watch, says Bangladesh may have won international praise for its humanitarian response to the ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya by Myanmar but the domestic human rights situation remains a cause for concern.

"The government continues to deny enforced disappearances … It must release individuals taken into custody by the security forces. Many of those disappeared are linked to the political opposition," Ganguly told Al Jazeera.

Ganguly said Bangladeshi journalists and activists operate in a climate of fear, while many citizens have been slapped with cases for criticising the government on social media.

Ali Riaz from the Illinois State University in the United States told Al Jazeera that the current political and human rights situation in Bangladesh is "not suitable" for holding an election, let alone an "inclusive" one.

Riaz thinks if the beleaguered BNP is forced to boycott the next national election, along with other parties of the political alliance it leads, the election will be "hollow without any moral legitimacy, just like the 2014 elections".

"Continued persecution of the opposition is not only unwise, but also counterproductive. There is a tendency among the ruling parties here to forget that," said Riaz.

Asif Nazrul, a professor of law at Dhaka University, said that the government denies the BNP and other opposition parties permission to hold rallies and processions "on security grounds", while it continues to hold large rallies in the run-up to the elections.

"It's a government and a political party which believe that they are not accountable to anyone. It's a dangerous sign in a democracy," said Nazrul.

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/f...g-bangladesh-party-state-180404082024893.html
 
. . .
I wish a credible opposition had managed to organise in the last 10 years.
While BAL has done a lot of creditable work for the economy, it has been marred by corruption and thuggery.

We need new leaders and ideas to take us to the next level.

Time is short but if the current uprising in the country gives rise to a new progrssive political party aiming for the next election I will be supportive if it. I do not mind if the elections get delayed a bit allowing the new party to organise.

A re-organised BNP led by Gen Mahbub winning the next election does not sound bad at all but all vermins like Moudud need to be flushed out.

The military and the West should be supportive of new, honesty leadership be it BNP or a new political party.
 
.
People there arent interested to vote. The turnout for last election was 22 %.
 
. .
They are not very democratic People. They have never been.

Tribal People are Not democratic
 
. . .
So you People were Champions of democracy and after 71 you dont care much for it?
Why do you think there is no alternate?

BNP did not participate in the previous election.

Voter turnout tends to be high when both BAL and BNP participate.

BNP being a backboneless entity is unable to mount a strong anti-govt campaign.

Association with JI has also done a lot of damage to BNP.

Any political entity which manages to launch a progressive, anti-corruption campaign will sweep elections from hereon.
 
.
BNP did not participate in the previous election.

Voter turnout tends to be high when both BAL and BNP participate.

BNP being a backboneless entity is unable to mount a strong anti-govt campaign.

Association with JI has also done a lot of damage to BNP.

Any political entity which manages to launch a progressive, anti-corruption campaign will sweep elections from hereon.

You live in a Fantasy
 
.
People there arent interested to vote. The turnout for last election was 22 %.
What will be the result if even 90% will vote? Election will be rigged election as usual .
To be honest only 1991 election and 1996 election ( 12 June ) was fair IMHO . In 1991 BNP got 140 seat and formed government and in 1996 BAL got 146 seats.
So they even didn't get simple majority to form a government alone.
But what happened from 2001? BNP Jamat alliance got 210+ seat ( can't remember exact figure ), and in 2009 BAL got 230+ seat.
I believe both election was a result of rigging, as even winning alloy didn't get simple majority, but superb majority.
Some say that BNP got the vote of Jamat so they got huge victory in every area.
I admit that Jamat always has good amount of votes in Bangladesh but that's not enough to get BNP super majority.
On the other hand, in 2009 BAL allied with leftist and they got 230+ seats.
Those leftist even can't win a single seat as a party ( yes they win 2/3 seats but it's because of the personal image of this candidate), and their voter numbers are considerably low than Jamat or other Islamic political parties, so there is no option for BAL to win such huge seats if Ershad doesn't have the popularity outside Rangpur division.
So probably time it was a rigged election.

Well I could be only wrong if hussein Muhammad Ershad's jatiyo party has actually popularity outside
Rangpur.
Only alliance with him can get anyone super majority, but still I am doubtful.
So the problem isn't not voter numbers, but the real problem is rigged election.
IMHO every election should be under Bangladesh Army.
I don't believe in election commission as every organisation in BD is partisan except military.
And this is a truth that almost all Bangladeshi know.
So if we want a fair election, the election must be under Bangladesh armed forces.
Only then voters will be ensured that their vote won't be rigged.
 
.
That will be good for Bangladesh, China with one party has become Global Power - Hasina have capability to do same for Bangladesh.....
 
.
That will be good for Bangladesh, China with one party has become Global Power - Hasina have capability to do same for Bangladesh.....


A lot of BD posters cannot see the big picture here.

What AL are doing is pretty much a mirror match of what happened in places like Taiwan and S Korea.
People should accept an element of corruption and thuggery for the long-term prosperity and health of BD.

What we are seeing now in terms of economic growth(8% a year) and infrastructure development will not have happened if BD had the usual AL/BNP rotation every five years.

The worst thing to now happen is if any other party got into power as the next 5 years will be spent re-tendering a lot of infrastructure projects/military acquisitions and also punishing the AL party for both real and point-settling reasons.

5 more years of AL rule is still needed for the economy, infrastructure and military buildup to be on a footing that a change of government will not ruin all this.
 
.
Any political entity which manages to launch a progressive, anti-corruption campaign will sweep elections from hereon.
Is there any such progressive-minded party/politician can be found in the country? Article 70 has capped any possibility of young generation leaders to surface up. Also, the young generation does not mean a group of students who passed just SSC or MA, or who are agitating in the streets. More matured people with a vision should come out who are already in politics. But, Article 70 puts a hindrance to it. Once a guy is with BNP or BAL, he cannot just come out of it because of this article.
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom