What's new

Iranian hatred of the USA unabated

The only one spreading hatred here (and regularly) is you. I merely pointed out a flaw in your initial response.

Read the thread title please.

It says "Iranian hatred of the USA"

you in your pathetic mind, are converting this into "Islamist hatred for poor little but humane fauj-historian" :D
 
Read the thread title please.

It says "Iranian hatred of the USA"

you in your pathetic mind, are converting this into "Islamist hatred for poor little but humane fauj-historian" :D

By the same token, shouldn't you have read the thread title too before you derailed the thread by taking the unnecessary potshot at the "stone age barbarians"?
 
By the same token, shouldn't you have read the thread title too before you derailed the thread by taking the unnecessary potshot at the "stone age barbarians"?

Anyone attacking embassies in today's world is stone age barbarian.

converting an embassy into a religious propaganda center is even more barbaric.

This is right in line with the stuff being discussed in the original post.


why you seem to be up in arms, is kind of childish if not down right moronic
 
Both raids are perfectly fine due to the involvement of the Revolt Guard, of which is considered to be a terror group, not just by the US but aplenty of countries.

You on the other hand broke all norms of the diplomatic code of conduct.

The US paid you back very well though.
nonsense, in both case they could not find a single military personnel only merchants and diplomat were target .also according to us and many other country CIA is a terrorist group and legitimate target.
 
nonsense, in both case they could not find a single military personnel only merchants and diplomat were target .also according to us and many other country CIA is a terrorist group and legitimate target.

Feel free to target whatever you wish. The aftermath will be as twice or thrice horrible than the act of terror.
 
Two wrongs make it right.

Correct?

as per your logic?


Has USA turned Iranian embassy building into the center of barbaric stone age religiosity?

Sure do all the comparisons you can

Very good.



Prove that 500 or so Americans in the embassy were all marines, ready to overthrow Ayatullah Khab****i?

Just show it for a moment. Thank you.

While the same Ayatullah Khab****i was given shelter in a Western secular country that happened to be one of the biggest allies of USA,.

Where the heck you learned your logic. Sir

Where the heck>



Attack on diplomats is despicable. whoever does it?

Why it is so hard to understand for you?


Now tell me if USA has converted Iranian embassy into some place for stone age barbaric religious place.

Yes.

Please tell us.

well did we hold all the diplomats ?
no only 60 of them all the rest were released .

second since when a museum is someplace for stone age barbaric .....

and also do they need to be marine to do the dirty work ? the spies behind the marines are the mastermind for coupes around the world .the money they distribute is their weapon not the gun they carry .

Feel free to target whatever you wish. The aftermath will be as twice or thrice horrible than the act of terror.
well some people are still looking for the spy they lost in kish several years ago.
 
well did we hold all the diplomats ?
no only 60 of them ///.

Agha

I never expected that a sensible person like you will come up with such a lame excuse.

what you say is like


--- A waywards wife when caught, tells her husband I didn fork 500 men, just 60 :D
 
puppets are puppets

Why are you now deciding which %age of puppet was with Commies
and which puppet was with USA

Puppets are different from the majority of a country . In that case I call the loyalists to Shah puppets cos they would have done what they did in 1953 if people hadn't kicked the US out of he country completely .

By the way , Would you please tell me what the definition of embassy is ?

I'm sure it's not a place to spy , But what the students found there was thousands of documents while staffs were destroying them .
 
Last edited:
Puppets are different from the majority of a country . In that case I call the loyalists to Shah puppets cos they would have done what they did in 1953 if people hadn't kicked the US out of he country completely .

By the way , Would you please tell me what the definition of embassy is ?

I'm sure it's not a place to spy , But what the students found there was thousands of documents while staffs were destroying them .

Sorry. the term has nothing to do with majority vs. minority. That's YOUR perception.

We all use the term "puppet" to denigrate our opponent.

you call Shah's supporters as Puppets just because you are opposed to Shah.

Hope this helps.
 
Sorry. the term has nothing to do with majority vs. minority. That's YOUR perception.

We all use the term "puppet" to denigrate our opponent.

you call Shah's supporters as Puppets just because you are opposed to Shah.

Hope this helps.

I don't oppose Shah and don't support Islamic Republic as well , They're both retards in some points .

What I'm saying is that Iranian people democratically chose IR and the world should accept that and in this case whoever don't respect the majority choice are puppets .
 
Anyone attacking embassies in today's world is stone age barbarian.

converting an embassy into a religious propaganda center is even more barbaric.

This is right in line with the stuff being discussed in the original post.


why you seem to be up in arms, is kind of childish if not down right moronic

Not up in arms - simply pointing out to you that your consistent use of media-indoctrinated meaningless buzzwords exposes you for what you are.

Incidentally, "stone age barbarians" ceased to exist after the stone ages. Anyone attacking an embassy is committing a crime at worst and/or a diplomatic faux de pas at best. It is possible, in other words, to disagree with the act of attacking a foreign mission without resorting to juvenile insults, as you consistently do here.
 
Incidentally, "stone age barbarians" ceased to exist after the stone ages. .

your logic is like:

--- monkeys ceased to exist when they were put in the zoo.

hahahahah

I don't oppose Shah and don't support Islamic Republic as well , They're both retards in some points .

What I'm saying is that Iranian people democratically chose IR and the world should accept that and in this case whoever don't respect the majority choice are puppets .

Iranian leadership has been like Mullah omer of Afghanistan.

-- They all butchered their opponents (physically and/or economically) after they won the election or ceased the gov somehow

Shah did it in the name of king
Musaddiq was going to do it (but wealthy Iranians got him before he could do his socialist commie handjob)
Ayatullah Khabeesis did it (and still doing it) in the name of Islam

everyone is naked in Iranian hamam
 
Back
Top Bottom