What's new

Iranian forces kill five Kurdish separatists, Revolutionary Guards say

you knew there is difference between Kurdish country by Kurdish dynasty , we have Kermani dynasty , we have lor dynasty ... do they also must get a separate country.

Great Britain also helped Reza Shah of Iran annex the Sheikhdom of Mohammerah during the Sheikh Khazal rebellion:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheikh_Khazal_rebellion

And America helped Iran crush the breakaway Kurdish Republic of Mahabad in the 1940s:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Mahabad

The "evil" West stood with Iran during the Iran crisis of 1946:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_crisis_of_1946

Not so evil anymore, huh?
still more evil as their actions created those separatist movement.
Sheikh khazeal was a local khan that wanted to create a kingdom for himself in Khuzestan and Bushehr .and guess who gave him the ambition
Kurdish republic of mahabad was nothing but an eastern Europe republic style land grabbing attempts by USSR and no USA army personnel participated in the operation and guess which guys attacked our country and made those separatist movements at the time.
who made the crisis of 1946 ? yes the evil west itself . ww2 had nothing to do with us but they wanted their victory bridge..
let show you the west true angelic face, look at what happened at the time of Mosaddeq .
 
you knew there is difference between Kurdish country by Kurdish dynasty , we have Kermani dynasty , we have lor dynasty ... do they also must get a separate country.


still more evil as their actions created those separatist movement.
Sheikh khazeal was a local khan that wanted to create a kingdom for himself in Khuzestan and Bushehr .and guess who gave him the ambition
Kurdish republic of mahabad was nothing but an eastern Europe republic style land grabbing attempts by USSR and no USA army personnel participated in the operation and guess which guys attacked our country and made those separatist movements at the time.
who made the crisis of 1946 ? yes the evil west itself . ww2 had nothing to do with us but they wanted their victory bridge..
let show you the west true angelic face, look at what happened at the time of Mosaddeq .
You're being way too harsh on the West.

My point is, the West has helped Iran on several occasions.

Sure, the West has done a lot of bad things too, but it has undoubtedly helped Iran when Iran needed it!

Do you think the Soviets would have withdrawn their troops from Iran were it not for the United States?

America forced the USSR to pull out of Iran. It gave Iran the opportunity to retake the breakaway Kurdish Republic of Mahabad.

As for Britain, I'm aware that the British initially sided with Sheikh Khazal, but that's only because they wanted someone to bring order/stability to western Khuzestan, which at that time was in a state of anarchy and wasn't being governed properly by anyone.

Once the British saw that Reza Shah was serious about governing all of Khuzestan, they told Sheikh Khazal to bugger off because, quite frankly, the Westerners detest the Arabs. They prefer the Iranians to the Arabs, and it has always been that way. That's why they don't even give a crap about the two so-called Emirati islands that are under Iranian control lol, even though relations between Iran and the West haven't been good in recent decades.

So, let's be a little bit fair.

Iranians shouldn't demonize the West at any given opportunity.

Sure, the British did a lot of bad things, but think about what they could've done to Iran had they wanted to.

They could have easily supported the Kurds of Mahabad, but they didn't. They could have supported Sheikh Khazal to the very end, but they told him to get lost.

I honestly feel that the Iranians are unwisely increasing their hostility with the West. They shouldn't do that. You shouldn't let the West become your number one enemy.
 
Back
Top Bottom