Iranian Defence News & Discussions.

[AbdulQadir7]

Iran has announced plans to increase its military budget by approximately 200%, as reported by government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani. This significant increase is part of a broader budget proposal submitted to the parliament for approval, reflecting Iran's response to escalating tensions, particularly with Israel.

Key Details:​

• Context of the Increase: The decision comes amid ongoing conflicts and exchanges of attacks between Iran and Israel, including recent missile strikes. The Iranian government has indicated that the increased funding will bolster its defense capabilities in light of these threats.
• Implications: The proposed budget increase is seen as a strategic move to enhance Iran's military readiness and capabilities, particularly in the face of perceived external threats. This aligns with Iran's historical focus on strengthening its military infrastructure and support for allied groups in the region.
• Regional Dynamics: The rise in military spending may further escalate tensions in the Middle East, as it could provoke reactions from neighboring countries and influence regional security dynamics. Iran's backing of militant groups like Hezbollah and Hamas adds complexity to the situation.

This substantial increase in Iran's military budget underscores the ongoing volatility in the region and Tehran's commitment to enhancing its defense posture amidst rising geopolitical challenges.

 

[AbdulQadir7]

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has declared that Iranis actively developing a "stockpile" of nuclear bombs aimed at destroying Israel. This statement comes in the wake of recent military tensions, including Israeli airstrikes on Iranian military targets.

Key Points:​

• Nuclear Threat: Netanyahu emphasized that Iran's efforts to accumulate nuclear weapons are coupled with the development of long-range and intercontinental missiles, which he claims could pose a threat not only to Israel but to global security as well. He stated, "Iran could threaten the entire world at any point."
• Recent Military Actions: The Israeli airstrikes on Iran were reportedly in retaliation for an earlier attack by Iran on Israeli territory. This cycle of violence underscores the escalating tensions between the two nations, particularly in light of Iran's advancing nuclear program.
• International Concerns: The international community, particularly Western nations, has expressed alarm over Iran's increasing stockpile of enriched uranium, which is nearing weapons-grade levels. Reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) indicate that Iran has significantly increased its uranium enrichment, raising concerns about its potential to develop nuclear weapons.
• Geopolitical Implications: Netanyahu's remarks reflect Israel's longstanding position on Iran's nuclear ambitions and its commitment to countering perceived threats. The situation remains tense, with both nations engaging in military posturing and rhetoric that could lead to further conflict in the region.

This declaration by Netanyahu highlights the critical security challenges facing Israel and the broader implications for regional stability as Iran continues to advance its nuclear capabilities amidst ongoing hostilities.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851086835885183125

 

[HaiderAfan]

Iran has announced plans to increase its military budget by approximately 200%, as reported by government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani. This significant increase is part of a broader budget proposal submitted to the parliament for approval, reflecting Iran's response to escalating tensions, particularly with Israel.

Key Details:​

• Context of the Increase: The decision comes amid ongoing conflicts and exchanges of attacks between Iran and Israel, including recent missile strikes. The Iranian government has indicated that the increased funding will bolster its defense capabilities in light of these threats.
• Implications: The proposed budget increase is seen as a strategic move to enhance Iran's military readiness and capabilities, particularly in the face of perceived external threats. This aligns with Iran's historical focus on strengthening its military infrastructure and support for allied groups in the region.
• Regional Dynamics: The rise in military spending may further escalate tensions in the Middle East, as it could provoke reactions from neighboring countries and influence regional security dynamics. Iran's backing of militant groups like Hezbollah and Hamas adds complexity to the situation.

This substantial increase in Iran's military budget underscores the ongoing volatility in the region and Tehran's commitment to enhancing its defense posture amidst rising geopolitical challenges.

View attachment 1033540View attachment 1033541

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851174507987325025

 

[HamzaWaseem]

Iran has announced plans to increase its military budget by approximately 200%, as reported by government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani. This significant increase is part of a broader budget proposal submitted to the parliament for approval, reflecting Iran's response to escalating tensions, particularly with Israel.

Key Details:​

• Context of the Increase: The decision comes amid ongoing conflicts and exchanges of attacks between Iran and Israel, including recent missile strikes. The Iranian government has indicated that the increased funding will bolster its defense capabilities in light of these threats.
• Implications: The proposed budget increase is seen as a strategic move to enhance Iran's military readiness and capabilities, particularly in the face of perceived external threats. This aligns with Iran's historical focus on strengthening its military infrastructure and support for allied groups in the region.
• Regional Dynamics: The rise in military spending may further escalate tensions in the Middle East, as it could provoke reactions from neighboring countries and influence regional security dynamics. Iran's backing of militant groups like Hezbollah and Hamas adds complexity to the situation.

This substantial increase in Iran's military budget underscores the ongoing volatility in the region and Tehran's commitment to enhancing its defense posture amidst rising geopolitical challenges.

View attachment 1033540View attachment 1033541

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851175965591732723

 

[AbdulQadir7]

Iran has asserted that its missile production capabilities remain unaffected by recent Israeli airstrikes. The Iranian leadership, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, has downplayed the impact of these strikes, emphasizing that they did not disrupt the country's defense manufacturing capabilities.

Key Points:​

• Resilience in Missile Production: Iranian officials have stated that despite Israeli attacks targeting military installations, the production of missiles continues unabated. They maintain that most missiles launched by Israel were intercepted, and any damage inflicted was minimal.
• Israeli Claims of Impairment: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed that their operations significantly impaired Iran's air defense and missile manufacturing capabilities. He described the strikes as precise and effective in achieving their objectives.
• Public Messaging: In response to the strikes, Iranian media has portrayed a narrative of resilience, showcasing daily life continuing as normal and framing the limited damage as a triumph over Israeli aggression. This strategy appears aimed at reassuring the Iranian public amidst rising tensions.
• Call for Preparedness: Khamenei and other Iranian leaders have indicated that while they do not seek war, they are prepared to respond to any threats against their sovereignty. They emphasize the need for military readiness in light of external aggressions.
• Geopolitical Context: The situation is part of a broader pattern of escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, particularly following Iran's missile launches directed at Israel earlier this month. The ongoing conflict has implications for regional stability and security dynamics.

Conclusion​

Iran's assertion that its missile production remains intact amidst Israeli strikes reflects a determined stance in the face of external pressures. As both nations continue to engage in military posturing, the potential for further escalation remains a concern for regional peace and security. Diplomatic efforts will be crucial in mitigating tensions and preventing a broader conflict.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851585421412626713

 

[HaiderAfan]

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has recently called for the formation of a global “military coalition” to confront Israel, framing this as a response to the escalating conflict with Palestine and alleged injustices against Palestinians. This statement signals Iran's intent to mobilize broader support among sympathetic nations or groups, potentially expanding the conflict's regional impact. Khamenei’s comments also reflect Iran's longstanding opposition to Israel, reinforcing its calls for collective action among allies in response to recent hostilities.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851585060098490614

 

[sidkhan2]

An informed source told Fars:A team of separatist terrorist groups were ambushed by IRGC intelligence officers while they were trying to enter Iran through the borders of the Kurdistan region of Iraq

 

[HaiderAfan]

Iran has called for the formation of a global coalition to confront what it describes as the "war crimes" committed by the Zionist regime in Gaza and Lebanon. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei made this statement during a recent address, emphasizing the need for international action against Israel's military actions, which he characterized as among the most brutal violations of international law.
Key Points:

• Call to Action: Khamenei urged governments and international bodies, particularly the United Nations, to take a stand against Israel's actions, which he claims have resulted in significant civilian casualties and destruction. He stated, "A global coalition should be created; a political coalition, economic coalition, or if necessary, military coalition against the evil Zionist regime"
• Response to Recent Attacks: This call comes in the wake of recent Israeli attacks on Iranian positions, which resulted in casualties among Iranian military personnel. Khamenei condemned these actions as provocations that must be met with a unified response from the international community
• Iran's Stance on Retaliation: Iranian officials have indicated that while they do not seek war, they are prepared to use "all available tools" to respond to perceived aggressions from Israel. This includes diplomatic measures as well as potential military responses
• International Reaction: The call for a coalition reflects Iran's ongoing efforts to rally support against Israel in the context of regional conflicts. It also highlights the complexities of Middle Eastern geopolitics, where alliances and enmities can shift rapidly based on current events.

Conclusion
Khamenei's remarks underscore Iran's determination to position itself as a leader in opposing Israeli actions in Gaza and Lebanon. The suggestion of forming a global coalition indicates Iran's desire to galvanize international support against what it views as systemic aggression by Israel. As tensions continue to escalate in the region, the implications of such calls for unity will be closely monitored by global powers and regional actors alike.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851632991790841947

 

[sidkhan2]

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khameneihas reportedly ordered preparations for a potential attack on Israel, signaling a significant escalation in the ongoing tensions between the two nations. This directive comes amid a backdrop of heightened military confrontations and retaliatory strikes following recent attacks attributed to both sides.

Key Developments:​

• Khamenei's Directive: In a recent speech, Khamenei emphasized the need for Iran to prepare for military action against Israel, framing it as a response to what he described as "Zionist aggression." This statement reflects Iran's longstanding position against Israel, which it views as an existential threat.
• Recent Military Actions: The order follows a series of military exchanges between Iran and Israel. Notably, Iran launched a significant missile and drone attack on Israel, which included over 300 drones and missiles. Israeli defense systems intercepted the majority of these attacks, but some projectiles managed to hit targets within Israeli territory, raising concerns about Iran's capabilities and intentions.
• Potential for Regional Conflict: Analysts warn that Khamenei's call for preparedness could lead to broader regional conflict, especially if Iran decides to leverage its proxy forces in Lebanon and Syria. Reports indicate that Iran may coordinate attacks from Iraqi territory, utilizing pro-Iran militias to avoid direct confrontation with Israeli forces.
• International Reactions: The U.S. and its allies are closely monitoring the situation, given the potential implications for regional stability and security. There are concerns that an escalation involving Iran could draw in other countries and exacerbate existing tensions in the Middle East.
• Historical Context: The relationship between Iran and Israel has been fraught with hostility since the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran. Iran does not recognize Israel's right to exist and has consistently supported groups like Hezbollah and Hamas that oppose Israeli actions.

Conclusion​

Khamenei's order to prepare for an attack on Israel underscores the precarious nature of Middle Eastern geopolitics. As both nations continue to engage in tit-for-tat military actions, the risk of a wider conflict looms large. The international community will be watching closely as events unfold, particularly with the potential for further escalation in this already volatile region.

 

[AbdulQadir7]

Iran's IRGC forces eliminate 4 terrorist mercenaries affilated with Israel in Sistan and Baluchestan province.
IRGC claims within 48 hours 4 terrorist were killed, 7 were arrested and 5 others surrendered.

 

[AbdulQadir7]

Donald Trump has issued a stark warning regarding the release of hostages held by Hamas, stating that if they are not freed before he assumes office on January 20, 2025, there will be "ALL HELL TO PAY" in the Middle East. This statement is widely interpreted as a direct warning to Iran, which has significant influence over Hamas.

Context of Trump's Warning:​

• Iran's Influence: Iran has been a key supporter of Hamas, providing military aid, training, and funding. As of 2023, Iranian support for Hamas has reportedly increased to $350 million annually
  Consequences for Iran: Trump's comments suggest that failure to act on the hostage situation could lead to severe repercussions for Iran.
  This escalates the stakes in the ongoing conflict and highlights the interconnectedness of these regional players.
  Given this relationship, Trump’s warning implies that Iran has the power to facilitate the release of the hostages.
• Hostage Situation: The hostage crisis has become a focal point in discussions surrounding the Israel-Hamas conflict. The Israeli government is under pressure to secure the release of hostages while also managing military operations against Hamas.

Implications:​

• Geopolitical Tensions: The warning adds to existing tensions in U.S.-Iran relations and reflects a broader strategy by Trump to adopt a more aggressive stance toward Iran and its allies in the region.
• Potential for Escalation: Should hostages remain unreleased, Trump's administration may consider military or economic actions against Iran, further complicating an already volatile situation in the Middle East.

This situation underscores the delicate balance of power in the region and the potential consequences of diplomatic failures among key players like Iran and Hamas.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1863683488102146230

 

[sidkhan2]

A massive convoy of Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) is reportedly advancing toward Syria, supported by Iranian special forces and Russian airstrikes. This coordinated effort aims to bolster the Syrian government's military capabilities against opposition forces, particularly in light of recent territorial gains by rebel groups in the region.

Key Developments:​

• Iraqi PMF Involvement: The PMF, a coalition of mostly Shiite militias in Iraq, has been increasingly active in Syria, often operating under the auspices of Iranian support. Their involvement is seen as part of a broader strategy to secure Iranian interests in the region and counteract rebel advances.
• Iranian and Russian Support: The operation is being backed by Iranian special forces, which provide military expertise and training to Syrian troops. Additionally, Russian airstrikes are expected to target opposition positions, enhancing the effectiveness of ground operations by pro-Assad forces.
• Recent Rebel Gains: Opposition factions, including Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), have recently made significant territorial gains, including capturing parts of Aleppo. This has prompted a swift military response from the Syrian government and its allies to regain control and stabilize the situation.

Broader Implications:​

The collaboration between Iraqi PMF, Iranian forces, and Russian military support underscores the complexity of the Syrian conflict and the interconnected nature of regional power dynamics. As these forces advance, they aim to reassert control over contested areas and push back against opposition groups that threaten the Assad regime's stability.This development also highlights ongoing geopolitical tensions, as various factions vie for influence in Syria amidst a backdrop of humanitarian crises and international scrutiny. The situation remains fluid, with potential implications for both local populations and broader regional stability as military operations intensify.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1864023831439876467

 

[JeremyVickers]

Iran has indicated that it may consider sending military troops to Syria if the Syrian government officially requests assistance. This statement was made by Iranian Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi during a recent interview, emphasizing Iran's readiness to support the Syrian government amid ongoing conflicts in the region.

Key Points:​

• Context of the Statement: The potential deployment of Iranian troops comes as Syria faces a resurgence of insurgent activity, particularly in the northwestern Aleppo province. Iranian officials have historically been involved in supporting the Assad regime through military advisors and logistical support since the onset of the Syrian civil war in 2011.
• Iran's Military Presence: While Iran has maintained a significant military presence in Syria, including advisors and support for various militia groups, it has not confirmed the permanent stationing of its troops there. The foreign minister's remarks suggest a willingness to escalate involvement if requested by Damascus.
• Regional Implications: The possibility of Iranian troop deployment could further complicate the already volatile situation in Syria, potentially heightening tensions with other regional powers, including Turkey and Israel, who have vested interests in the conflict.
• Broader Strategy: Iran's involvement in Syria is part of its broader strategy to maintain influence in the region and support allied groups, including Hezbollah. The Iranian government views the survival of Assad's regime as crucial for its regional ambitions and for maintaining a supply route to Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Conclusion:​

Iran's readiness to send troops to Syria underscores its commitment to supporting the Assad regime amid ongoing challenges from insurgent groups. This development could have significant implications for regional stability and international relations, especially as other powers continue to navigate their interests in the complex Syrian conflict. The situation remains dynamic, with potential for further escalation depending on developments on the ground.

 

[lulldapull]

Iran has indicated that it may consider sending military troops to Syria if the Syrian government officially requests assistance. This statement was made by Iranian Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi during a recent interview, emphasizing Iran's readiness to support the Syrian government amid ongoing conflicts in the region.

Key Points:​

• Context of the Statement: The potential deployment of Iranian troops comes as Syria faces a resurgence of insurgent activity, particularly in the northwestern Aleppo province. Iranian officials have historically been involved in supporting the Assad regime through military advisors and logistical support since the onset of the Syrian civil war in 2011.
• Iran's Military Presence: While Iran has maintained a significant military presence in Syria, including advisors and support for various militia groups, it has not confirmed the permanent stationing of its troops there. The foreign minister's remarks suggest a willingness to escalate involvement if requested by Damascus.
• Regional Implications: The possibility of Iranian troop deployment could further complicate the already volatile situation in Syria, potentially heightening tensions with other regional powers, including Turkey and Israel, who have vested interests in the conflict.
• Broader Strategy: Iran's involvement in Syria is part of its broader strategy to maintain influence in the region and support allied groups, including Hezbollah. The Iranian government views the survival of Assad's regime as crucial for its regional ambitions and for maintaining a supply route to Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Conclusion:​

Iran's readiness to send troops to Syria underscores its commitment to supporting the Assad regime amid ongoing challenges from insurgent groups. This development could have significant implications for regional stability and international relations, especially as other powers continue to navigate their interests in the complex Syrian conflict. The situation remains dynamic, with potential for further escalation depending on developments on the ground.

View attachment 1035068

Iran should not send troops into Syria. It will set a bad precedent and reduce it down to the level of the US Turkey or Israel. No Iranian should be apprehended in Syria.

Only military advisors!

 

[AbdulQadir7]

A massive joint force convoy of the Syrian National Army (SNA) has reached the outskirts of Hama, aiming to assist in liberating the city from the Assad regime and Iranian militias. This development comes amid ongoing military operations in the region, as various factions vie for control over strategic areas.

Key Developments​

1. Arrival of SNA Convoy: The SNA, composed of various opposition groups, has mobilized a significant number of troops and equipment towards Hama. This convoy is part of a broader effort to support the ongoing offensive against pro-government forces in the area.
2. Current Offensive Context: The SNA's movement coincides with a renewed offensive by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and allied factions, which have recently captured several villages and towns in Hama province. The conflict has intensified following HTS's successful operations that began on November 27, 2024, leading to significant territorial gains.
3. Strategic Importance of Hama: Hama is strategically located in central Syria and serves as a critical point connecting Aleppo and Damascus. Control over this city is vital for both the Assad regime and opposition forces, making it a focal point in the ongoing civil war.
4. Military Engagements: Reports indicate that fierce battles are underway as government forces attempt to repel the advancing SNA and HTS factions. The Syrian army has launched counteroffensives with air support from Russian aircraft, aiming to push back rebel advances and secure key positions around Hama.
5. Casualties and Impact: The fighting has resulted in significant casualties on both sides, with reports indicating that over 1,600 militants from HTS and allied groups have been killed since the start of the recent offensive. This high toll underscores the intensity of the conflict as both sides engage in heavy combat.

Implications for the Conflict​

• Increased Tensions: The mobilization of SNA forces signals a potential escalation in hostilities as multiple factions converge on Hama. This could lead to further destabilization in an already volatile region.
• International Reactions: The situation is being closely monitored by international observers, particularly given the involvement of Russian air support for Syrian government forces. Any significant shift in control could have broader implications for regional stability.
• Humanitarian Concerns: As fighting intensifies around populated areas like Hama, civilian populations are at increased risk. The humanitarian situation could worsen as more people are displaced due to ongoing military operations.

Conclusion​

The arrival of a massive joint force convoy from the Syrian National Army at Hama's outskirts marks a critical juncture in the ongoing conflict between opposition forces and the Assad regime. With fierce battles expected in the coming days, the outcome will significantly impact control over this strategically vital city and shape the future dynamics of the Syrian civil war.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1864584961094779008