What's new

Iranian consulate in Basra south Iraq is one fire now as thousands of protestors try storm it

I am also looking forward to seeing how these frustrated Iraqis will get Iran(literally, politically, financially, petrochecmically, semantically, religously, regionally etc etc) out of Iraq. Tbh, i hate to say this, but i think Iranian leaders are too long term thinking to even be angry about this(relative to other important things they care about). I believe Iranian leaders can accept all their buildings in iraq burning down if they can get the next PM in Iraq who isnt anti-Iran. lets watch and see.

I hate to say this, but in the middle east, ANGER is not a game plan. Iraqis are frustrated,but whats their real game plan? And if Iraqis bring a leader/PM who is anti-Iran, Iran will remove them. US cant even bring its own leader to lead Iraq without Iran's approval. but like i said again, LETS WATCH. this is the start, not the end. its not about how you start, its all about how you finish. they're starting angry and frustrated, we will see how these protesters "finish"...

Iran shall leave, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria and Yemen etc. similarly India shall leave Kashmir.
 
.
I am also looking forward to seeing how these frustrated Iraqis will get Iran(literally, politically, financially, petrochecmically, semantically, religously, regionally etc etc) out of Iraq. Tbh, i hate to say this, but i think Iranian leaders are too long term thinking to even be angry about this(relative to other important things they care about). I believe Iranian leaders can accept all their buildings in iraq burning down if they can get the next PM in Iraq who isnt anti-Iran. lets watch and see.

I hate to say this, but in the middle east, ANGER is not a game plan. Iraqis are frustrated,but whats their real game plan? And if Iraqis bring a leader/PM who is anti-Iran, Iran will remove them. US cant even bring its own leader to lead Iraq without Iran's approval. but like i said again, LETS WATCH. this is the start, not the end. its not about how you start, its all about how you finish. they're starting angry and frustrated, we will see how these protesters "finish"...
You need to understand that in the long term the power of the masses (majority of people) will prevail. If Iraqi majority rejects Mullah interference in Iraq, so be it. If Iranian people, the masses, reject the Islamic Republic, so be it. It will go the way the people want. Never forget this. The majority of the people will prevail in the long term.
 
.
Iran shall leave, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria and Yemen etc. similarly India shall leave Kashmir.
well every body want somebody leave someplace i'm sure if you ask an Indian he will say Pakistan must leave Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan.
but what baffle me that they are thinking of their country interest . but on PDF some people think of a family interest (that named a country after themselves) that has nothing to do with their own country
 
.
Our unlucky Pakistani embassy in Tehran has experienced being set upon by Iranian regime student mobs. More than once ! So I have no sympathy for Iranians consulate in Iraq unlike our embassy in Tehran. Iranians in Iraq are involved up to there neck in creating a divided sectarian society.
 
.
well every body want somebody leave someplace i'm sure if you ask an Indian he will say Pakistan must leave Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan.
but what baffle me that they are thinking of their country interest . but on PDF some people think of a family interest (that named a country after themselves) that has nothing to do with their own country

Your justification for your mischief is flawed.
 
. .
Our unlucky Pakistani embassy in Tehran has experienced being set upon by Iranian regime student mobs. More than once ! So I have no sympathy for Iranians consulate in Iraq unlike our embassy in Tehran.
Ok, understandable.

Iranians in Iraq are involved up to there neck in creating a divided sectarian society.
really??? this is false. Iraq has always been heavily divided, Saddam's iron fist rule was just the glue that kept all the sects and parties together. First of all, US invasion destroyed that cohesion and then Iran took advantage of it. Dont hate the player, hate the game.

You need to understand that in the long term the power of the masses (majority of people) will prevail. If Iraqi majority rejects Mullah interference in Iraq, so be it. If Iranian people, the masses, reject the Islamic Republic, so be it. It will go the way the people want. Never forget this. The majority of the people will prevail in the long term.
conclusion? NOW is not the right timing for the protesters. i agree!
 
.
Large reason as to why the popular protest express anger towards Iran's regime is because those that came to rule Iraq after 2003 were largely the ones that sided with Iran during the Iran-Iraq war and were living in Iran for a couple of decades. Those same politicians have failed since 2003 in every field and the country is a shithole.

Ok, understandable.


really??? this is false. Iraq has always been heavily divided, Saddam's iron fist rule was just the glue that kept all the sects and parties together. First of all, US invasion destroyed that cohesion and then Iran took advantage of it. Dont hate the player, hate the game.


conclusion? NOW is not the right timing for the protesters. i agree!

The entire regional sect thing is a recent thing, even throughout the 2006 civil war, regime changes and 2014 crisis the country keeps together as both Sunnis and Shias identify as Iraqis. Only Kurds wish to separate but we don't even see them as Iraqis. The Sunni Shia sect split is ignored and not cared for in Iraq.
 
. .
It will be the way the majority of the people want. At the end the majority will prevail.
A clear majority of Iranians support the current system. Thats just the damn truth. Yes some protested, but how many? apparently it was 200,000 people. Its a good and large number of people, but as a reflection of Iranian society, that is 0.25% if Iranian population that protested. You and i can conclude from that THAT Most Iranians in Iran currently did not agree with either how protesters acted, or/and the act of protesting.Outliers dont define the general trendI understand how you feel and i know where you are coming from, but i can say with 100% confidence that you are ignoring certain realities about Iran. There is also a correlation in my opinion between whether an Iranian lives outside Iran and either supporting the Shah loving Iran OR/and hating the current system. Just sayin...
 
.
A clear majority of Iranians support the current system.
And here is when i stopped reading the rest of your post. How can you make such a bold claim, from where you got the courage ? From footage of the state media? Even the regime's own statistics dont dare to portray such a statement. So who are you to make such a claim ? For your (urgently needed) information There is no open referendum in Iran, since 1979 people were not asked to vote for Yes/No to the Islamic Republic system anymore.

I dare the system put up such a referendum. You will see what the results will bring. Remember this, ideological bonded mercenary, light will prevail over darkness. THE MASSES will win at the end.

Time is ticking in favour of the people and against the corrupt system. And you know this too. We shall see who will have the last laugh. A bunch of mercenaries or the true majority native to that land.

And dont bother to reply to my post because i will not even read it (waste my time).
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom