What's new

Iranian Chill Thread

Demagogy from regime-affiliated USA propaganda sources.

Reality is this:

View attachment 960391

https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/...ion_docs/INTA91_1_01_Esfandiary_Tabatabai.pdf

"I"SIS was a tool of NATO and zionist policy. It had fulfilled its mission in part when the Resistance reorganized to launch its counter-offensive in the summer of 2014. That's when a panicked USA jumped in to prevent the Resistance from regaining all "I"SIS-occupied territories and thus to maintain a foothold in Iraq and Syria.
Yeah sure since Iran is next door and can help fight ISIS quicker before U.S. can help which by invitation of Iraqi government. You can say all you want but U.S. led coalition helped Iraq retake the territories from ISSI. No matter how the Iranians want to portray as the only ones to fight ISIS.


 
.
Yeah sure since Iran is next door and can help fight ISIS quicker before U.S. can help which by invitation of Iraqi government. You can say all you want but U.S. led coalition helped Iraq retake the territories from ISSI. No matter how the Iranians want to portray as the only ones to fight ISIS.



Respective motivations are key. It's Washington's policies which unleashed "I"SIS on nations of the region to start with. Iran was to be the next goal, but she defeated the plot.

Similar to how the USA removed Saddam... after protecting and supplying his regime for the better part of the 1980's in its war of aggression on Iran.
 
.
Respective motivations are key. It's Washington's policies which unleashed "I"SIS on nations of the region to start with. Iran was to be the next goal, but she defeated the plot.

Similar to how the USA removed Saddam... after protecting and supplying his regime for the better part of the 1980's in its war of aggression on Iran.
Why would we need to do that since the U.S. left Iraq and were glad to do so before being asked to come back in to help considering its the same president who wanted to leave who sent troops back in. Could have easily just stayed in long before ISIS excuse came in. Saddam invaded Kuwait and U.S. led coalition kicked him out. Unless you think Iran was the one that did that.
 
. .
Why would we need to do that since the U.S. left Iraq and were glad to do so before being asked to come back in to help considering its the same president who wanted to leave who sent troops back in. Could have easily just stayed in long before ISIS excuse came in. Saddam invaded Kuwait and U.S. led coalition kicked him out. Unless you think Iran was the one that did that.

My explanations were clear and contain all responses to the above. Believe what you want.
 
. .
Listen to Alizade nicely debunking the narrative - shared by oppositionists, hostile foreign powers as well as in-house liberals, that Iran's holding back due to the prospect of a zio-American response.

Unlike its zio-American imperialist adversaries, the Islamic Republic does not seek to vassalize partners and allies. The IR cooperates with them on equal footing. By definition, to acknowledge Iran's role does not amount to taking credit for an ally's own initiative nor to negate said ally's agency.

Iran is not a puppeteer. She's a source of inspiration by virtue of a victorious Islamic Revolution which threw off the shackles of imperial servitude. Iran's a literal university of empowerment, assisting nations and liberation movements worldwide to move onto the path of Resistance, or to tread said path more efficiently as is the case of the Palestinians.

This is why Iran represents such a major challenge to the empire's regional and global hegemony, and why the latter is bent on neutralizing Iran.

 
Last edited:
.
Same for you.

Your post wasn't addressing my point. With the exception of the comment on Saddam which isn't accurate since he wasn't ousted for having invaded Kuwait, other bogus justifications were invoked, whilst the actual goal of the illegal occupation was what I described before i.e. neo-con strategy to remodel the region through force.
 
.
These will be important evidence to bring to a future tribunal / ICC.

Nothing will ever happen as long as US is superpower and has Europe on their side.

This is a western led world order. Don’t forget it.

Another day another Hezbollah firing AT missiles at Israel and Israel playing cat and mouse with helicopter gunships and artillery.

The fact not a single rocket (from HZ) has been fired is very telling. They are trying to contain this border skirmish level.

 
. .
Demagogy from regime-affiliated USA propaganda sources.

Reality is this:

View attachment 960391

https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/...ion_docs/INTA91_1_01_Esfandiary_Tabatabai.pdf

"I"SIS was a strategy tool of NATO and zionist policy to destabilize the Axis of Resistance, uproot and tear the social fabric in West Asia and facilitate revision of regional borders inherited from the Sykes-Picot agreement, the ultimate goal being generalized "ethno"-sectarian balkanization of nation-states as per the Bernard Lewis, Oded Yinon and Ralph Peters plans and in accordance with "constructive chaos" theories prevalent in Washington establishment circles.

"I"SIS had fulfilled its mission in part when the Resistance reorganized to launch a counter-offensive in the summer of 2014. That's when a panicked USA jumped in to prevent the Resistance from regaining all "I"SIS-occupied territories, else it would have lost its foothold in Iraq and Syria.
That image shows that US and Iran are supporting same elements in the region. Do you realize this?

Assad regime provided space and route to Al-Qaeda affiliates to wreck havoc in Iraq:

During the early stages of the U.S. occupation of Iraq, the Syrian regime enabled the transit of radical Sunni Islamist fighters to the country, where they targeted Americans and mostly Iranian-backed Shiites.


These Al-Qaeda affiliates came together to establish the notorious Al-Qaeda Network in Iraq (AQI), and this group sparked Shia - Sunni strife in Iraq with its misdeeds:




US-led forces fought and defeated AQI among other insurgent groups and managed to stabilize Iraq in 2011, but this was a costly undertaking that claimed many lives in the process. Obama administration withdrew American forces from Iraq in 2011 with the assumption that Iraq is largely stabilized and capable of managing its affairs at this stage:



But Syrian "terrorism export services" to Iraq continued with Al-Qaeda affiliates in Syria colluding with disgruntled elements in Iraq (Saddam loyalists) to launch ISIL movement in 2013:






Article.gif



Syria and Iraq had deliberated on the possibility of merger in earlier times and ISIL movement was a bad immitation of this sentiment.

Former Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Ibadi - one of the leading figureheads in fight against ISIL in the Middle East - also pointed out that Syria was exporting terrorism to Iraq:

Our aim is to stop or to control regional conflicts. There is a conflict in the region, there is a huge conflict. You have Saudi Arabia on one side, probably eager to be a leader of the Islamic Sunni world. You have Iran on the other side who is eager to become [the leader of] the Shia Islamic world, or even beyond. You have Turkey, as well, competing for the leadership of the Muslim Sunni world. And here we are having conflict in Yemen, having conflict in Syria, and it’s been extended before to Iraq. In Iraq, we don’t want to be part of this conflict. We are looking after our own interest, and we think we are the victims of this conflict. What happened in Syria impacted us directly.

Look what happened with Daesh when they crossed the borders into Iraq.
So, I think we are very eager to stop these regional conflicts. It’s tough. It happens to be we are here, Iraq is here. We cannot move it from the map. We are bordering Turkey, bordering Iran, bordering Saudi Arabia, bordering Jordan, Kuwait, Syria, of course. And we are here, we have to live with our neighbors…


When Syrian Civil War broke out in 2011, terrorists running amok in Syria colluded with Saddam loyalists in Iraq to seize Iraqi and Syrian lands for themselves:

_106170029_end_of-caliphate_v8_640-nc.png


Haider al-Abadi told Americans that the only way to save Iraq is by putting an end to Syrian "terrorism export services."

Obama administration got the message and dispatched American forces to Iraq to support Iraqi government in its mission to defeat ISIL in the country (Operation Inherent Resolve), and this operation was also expanded to Syria with support of Kurd:




These realities are also touched upon in following article:


-----

Iran worked with Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces to fight ISIL in Iraq.

Iran also worked with its allies in Syria to fight ISIL but as a secondary objective. The (Assad regime + Iran + Hezbollah + Russia) collective was working to defeat Syrian rebels in Syria who were opposing Assad regime.


Iran could respond to ISIL movement earlier because US had left Iraq in 2011.

US could not come back and fight ISIL immediately.

-----

I understand that US and Iran have tensions but you are blaming the wrong side for creating ISIL.

If anything, Iran has benefited the most from American military operations in the Middle East:

1. Operation Iraqi Freedom to eliminate Saddam regime (2003 - 2011)
2. Operation Inherent Resolve to eliminate ISIL (2014 - 2021)

US have defeated two of the greatest threats to Iran in the region.

It is not difficult to see why Saudi and Turkey are upset.

What are you complaining about? Strange spin you give to these matters, dear.
 
.
Another day another Hezbollah firing AT missiles at Israel and Israel playing cat and mouse with helicopter gunships and artillery.

The fact not a single rocket (from HZ) has been fired is very telling. They are trying to contain this border skirmish level.

But zionists consider those fired ATGM's be game changing.


Hebrew media: A senior security official told Israeli Channel 14: The event that just happened in the north changes the rules of the game
 
.
Gaza-Israel war - possible outcomes:

(1) BEST CASE: Israel launches limited ground invasion of Gaza and claims victory after a few weeks in the face of increasing international discomfort with civilian casualties, Israel claims to have destroyed the military capabilities of Hamas/PIJ. IDF then withdraws from Gaza, reopens humanitarian channels / water / fuel etc, Muslim countries pour aid into Gaza. Israel and what remains of Hamas exchange some prisoners and Hamas/PIJ slowly rebuild in Gaza.

...

(5) WORST CASE: Israel launches comprehensive ground invasion of Gaza, inflicts huge massacres and war crimes as tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians are massacred or starve to death. International response is limited / ignored. Hamas/PIJ are effectively destroyed and Israel permanently occupies Gaza, opening humanitarian corridor to facilitate ethnic cleansing / Nakba 2.0. Gaza becomes West Bank 2.0 with heavily protected Jewish settlements and thousands of military checkpoints destroying life for civilians inside Gaza, with the goal of eventual annexation of all of Gaza into Israel.

I guess we will land somewhere between the best and worst cases. This also assume there will be no major conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.
 
.
Senior Hamas official confirms Iran was not involved in the recent attacks, and was only informed 30 minutes after the operation started.

So now we have: Khamenei, Iranian mission to the UN and Hamas itself denying Iran had any role in this attack specifically. And some still seek to claim Iranian responsibility for this attack in an increasingly pathetic attempt to absolve the IR of its responsibility to respond to Israeli acts of aggression against Iran.


Also interesting is that the senior Hamas official states that after Iran, Hezbollah is a large supporter of Hamas, pointing to increased cooperation between Hezbollah and Hamas in recent years.
 
.
Do you dispute that Sunnis commit the greatest % of terrorist attacks among Muslims? Look at Pakistan alone, how many Shiites have died due Sunni’s blowing up mosques or schools full of children?

What about Sunnis supporting the rise of ISIS in Syria and Iraq? How many Sunni tribal leaders in Iraq cheered ISIS as they murdered Shiites?

Can you show me a Shiite blowing up a mosque? Can you show me a Shiite blowing up a school full of Sunni children?



Right, Iran told Hamas to go to music festival and kill civilians. Sure, do you ever take accountability for your fellow Muslims or do you always come up with excuses?

I bet you were one of those cheering when ISIS rose up and said it was because “Sunni’s were being oppressed”

Get out of your with your bag of excuses. Now you’re trying to blame Palestinians fighters actions on Iran. Pathetic
More than 80% of World Muslim Population is Sunni.
About 50 out of 56 Muslim countries are Sunni majority.
So there will always be some stupid people.
Foreign Countries like Iran,US,etc brainwash them and use them in their wars and when they commit war crimes,you hypocrites blame Sunni sect for this?

Regarding Music Festival, Iranis killed their own women just for not wearing Hijab and you think they can't order Hamas to kill people at Music Festival?


You are the biggest hypocrite here, Shias brainwash Sunnis? Palestine would never have done this if Iran never existed? This is 100% in the interests of Iran? Palestinians loves being treated as subhumans and doesn't want at all to respond to IDF animals?
Irani Shias use their emotions for their own geostrategic purpose
When Sunni Muslim countries like Egypt and other Arab Countries fought Israelis,there were no war crimes committed but Irani backed Hamas has done this
So it's not about Sunni Sect it's about backers
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom