Messerschmitt
SENIOR MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/Major.jpg)
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2019
- Messages
- 2,662
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This should explain why a recon UAV was in the middle of air-defenses
به نظر من نفت یه چیزیه که ایرانی ها رو از زمان قاجار عقب انداخته![]()
نفت ایران از گردشگری ترکیه عقب میافتد؟
دولت ترکیه پیشبینی کرده درآمدهای حاصل از گردشگری این کشور در سال جاری میلادی به رکورد ۵۶ میلیارد دلار برسد؛ رقمی که میتواند از درآمدهای خالص نفتی ایران پیشی بگیرد.www.sharghdaily.com
به نظرم بهتر بود تیتر و موضوعگردشگری ایران از نفت ترکیه عقب میافتد ؟
استفاده میشد
جدا از طنز تلخ ماجرا مقاله خوبیه
به نظر من کسانی که این تیترها رو میزنن یه سری نفوذین که میخوان ایران رو از تمرکز به مسائل اصلی به حاشیه بکشونن و چند قطبی توی کشور ایجاد کنناز یک طرف دعوت به نقد و انتقاد کردن و جالبه که این دعوت با استناد به رفتار آقای خامنهای داره توجیه میشه اونم از طریق وب سایت خبری قوه قضاییه
![]()
فیلم یکی از دیدارهای خصوصی مرحوم صابری با آیتالله خامنهای
پایگاه اطلاع رسانی اخبار رهبر انقلاب در سالگرد درگذشت مرحوم کیومرث صابری، فیلم یکی از دیدارهای خصوصی مرحوم صابری با آیتالله خامنهای را منتشر کرد.www.mizanonline.ir
از طرف دیگه فضا رو فشرده نشون دادن با دادگاهی کردن روزنامه و روزنامه نگار ( جائی که باید تیزترین و برندهترین قلم ها اونجا باشه )
![]()
ÙØ§Ø¬Ø±Ø§Û Ø§Ø¯Ø§ÙÙâدار کارÛکاتÙر سردار رادا٠در رÙزÙاÙÙ ÙÙØ´ÙرÛØ Ù¾ÙÛس Ùجدد اطÙاعÛ٠داد
تسÙÛÙ ÙÙشت: Ùرکز اطÙاع رساÙÛ Ù Ø§Ø±ØªØ¨Ø§Ø·Ø§Øª ÙعاÙÙت ÙرÙÙÚ¯Û Ù Ø§Ø¬ØªÙØ§Ø¹Û Ùراجا اعÙا٠کرد: ب٠دÙبا٠اذعا٠رÙزÙاÙÙ ÙÙØ´ÙØ±Û ÙبÙÛ Ø¨Ø± ارتکاب Ø®Ø·Ø§Û ØºÛرعÙد در استÙاد٠ÙاÙÙاسب از تصÙÛر سردار راداÙØ Ù¾ÙÛس از شکاÛت...www.khabaronline.ir
View attachment 927508
دو گانگیهای این شکلی توجیه ناپذیر هستند
You should add this to the made in Iran thread.
Then I'd advise correcting priorities.
Iran is comfortably competing with the latter already.
Speculative assertion.
Income rose over the past months, therefore your previous suggestion that poverty must have skyrocketed from 30% to over 50% during this period cannot be the case.
Living standards and purchasing power in Iran improved significantly after the victory of the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
See:
https://djavadsalehi.com/2018/03/21...ard-of-iranians-higher-before-the-revolution/
https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/44...in-Iran-60-percent-higher-than-pre-Revolution
Again it's not "me" saying that, but the relevant statistical office. Which happens to be equipped the technical means of conducting nationwide empirical studies, and unlike random politicians doesn't have reelection nor other items of political expediency in mind.
You on the other hand have kept repeating a claim without producing any credible source to substantiate it. What you 'heard' is really of no consequence: you need valid evidence to support it, otherwise it has no place in a serious discussion.
Concerning recent currency devaluations, I already responded by reminding that salaries were raised as well. So compared to last year, the inflation-induced added strain on living standards is not exactly as significant as you seem to believe.
You realize this is a legacy of the previous administration's blatant failures, and very far from representing a constant after the Islamic Revolution, right?
Incidentally, the administration in question was led by the a camp which happens to be under the chronic delusion that making concessions to the west will yield sanctions relief and economic prosperity. Something you go on advocating in spite of the historic experience alluded to, which clearly demonstrates how Iranian concessions were not followed by any meaningful easing of sanctions.
In 2013 for instance, Iran's poverty rate stood at 18,8%. In 2019 it surpassed 25% due to the Rohani administration's policies.
Under the ouster Pahlavi monarchy, poverty was widespread including after the 1973 oil boom. In 1977, 46% of Iranians were living under the poverty line according to the World Bank. This is while in the early 2000's the Islamic Republic had managed to halve that figure.
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/IRN/iran/poverty-rate
This all suggests the issue can and will probably be fixed once again. It's a matter of time, unless western-appeasing liberals manage to obstruct ore sabotage adequate solutions.
Inflation is practically Iran's sole problematic macroeconomic indicator by the way. Unemployment for instance is not too high, the balance of payments and balance of trade are favorable, public debt levels are extremely low and so on. Moreover Iran is not experiencing stagflation, since GDP growth is positive.
So your cursory catastrophist statements about the Iranian economy do not properly reflect actual ground reality, nor do they document the factors at play.
At this point it's safe to conclude your information on the economic debate in Iran tends to be rather limited. Which you can't be faulted for per se. However, you also appear to be short on motivation when it comes to acquiring the knowledge necessary to discuss the subject. I shared some sources useful to this purpose, but it would seem as if you choose to ignore them. Preferring instead to rely on hearsay as well as slogan-like, superficial talking points reminiscent of mainstream media and oppositionist discourse, which is misleading by essence.
I will have to repeat, Iran under the foregoing liberal administration attempted to reach an agreement with western powers in good faith, and said powers never fulfilled their commitments, trampling the deal under everyone's eyes from day one.
They unmistakably demonstrated their complete lack of interest for anything short of unconditional capitulation on Iran's part.
Thus, even if Iran were to forego nuclear energy altogether, Washington and Brussels egged on by Tel Aviv would come up with some other pretext to sanction Iran. This would go on until Iran accepts to give up her main assets of deterrence, namely her ballistic missile and drone power as well as her regional system of alliances. Which would invite military aggression or other decisive forms of destabilization by the enemy, as Libya experienced first hand.
Secondly, Iran's peaceful nuclear energy program is a long term investment par excellence. The share of nuclear power in Iran's overall energy production can and will be raised progressively. At the very least, new power plants will complement the existing one to maintain a constant share as total output goes up. Iran's not in a hurry in this regard.
Thirdly, nuclear science has numerous benefits and ramifications well beyond the production of energy. These are of both civilian (scientific progress, agricultural uses, medical applications, etc) and military nature - by the latter I'm referring to the potential break-out capability it endows Iran with, which has been acting as a major element of deterrence against any potential aggressors. Potential aggressors of which there is and will be no shortage in a region like West Asia and for a country such as Iran. History should be a guide here.
Last but not least, sanctions are not the main obstacle to economic progress. Iran can overcome the bulk of economic challenges she's facing through appropriate and adapted government policies.
A rash view of things, which is missing the central stakes at hand.
The zionist regime has no tolerance for powerful integrated nation-states in its vicinity, and that includes countries beyond Occupied Palestine's immediate neighbors. Was Iraq sharing any borders with the zionist regime for the Isra"el" lobby in Washington to push for invading that country in 2003?
As for those who think Tel Aviv will take aim at antagonistic governments only, they ought to familiarize themselves with the Bernard Lewis doctrine publicly expressed at the Moshe Dayan center in the 1970's. Or with the Oded Yinon plan, published in the early 1980's. Both of which are calling for the dismantling of regional nation-states into sub-national entities along "ethno"-linguistic or confessional lines.
Likewise, people should explain what kind of a regime will have its minister speak next to maps incorporating a neighbors with which they actually struck a peace deal?
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-eas...ister-over-use-of-greater-israel-map/2851154#
Now let's take a look back at the former regime in Iran. According to oppositionists and to critics of the Islamic Republic's support for the Palestinian cause, the shah's cooperation with the zionists was beneficial for Iran and her people. That is a flawed supposition though. In reality, not only did Isra"el" see in Iran a milking cow, as illustrated by the rip off that was Project Flower...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Flower
...but much more importantly, the zionist regime was not content with Iran's refusal to extend support to the Palestinians. What they did, was to encroach upon and infiltrate Iranian institutions at strategic levels. Zionist networks including high placed local oligarchs of Jewish and Haifan Baha'i obedience were working to influence Iranian policy-making in Tel Aviv's favor. The country's paramount security agency SAVAK was literally set up not just by the CIA and MI6 but also by Mossad, which retained loyal men at key positions within the organization.
The zionist regime is a security threat for Iran no matter how one will look at it.
As for the odds of the Resistance coming out victorious, as long as there are people who actively reject the zionist neo-colonial yoke, the regime will be at risk of collapse in the same way as apartheid South Africa. The latter wasn't brought down by military conquest either. Nonetheless the resistance movement led by the ANC proved instrumental in the process.
The smart way for Syria to confront the zionist regime is through asymmetrical means. Which Syria has resumed, as witnessed with the recent Palestinian rocket fire from Syrian soil following the raid on Al-Aqsa Mosque.
In view of Syria's situation after years of devastating war, expecting Damascus to go all in however would be absurd.
Again their independence, their national self-determination, their sovereignty.
Addressed above.
1) Specific Palestinian organizations. Not Palestinians per se nor all Palestinians groups.
2) This is not a reason to turn passive towards a major threat to Iran's security, stemming from an expansionist and domineering colonialist entity.
Speculation coupled with ad populum.
The policy ranks among elementary geostrategic imperatives for Iran and it has successfully held at bay a dangerous regime out to subdue Iran and threaten her territorial integrity.
The only baseless rhetoric I see consists of a series of sweeping simplifications about the Iranian economy post-Revolution, combined with advocacy of something that was actually tried but failed blatantly i.e. some acceptable resolution of the standoff with western imperialist powers.
You work in a book store in Tehran, and your monthly salary is $270 (in USD equivalent - free market rate?)I am in a book store in Tehran
I am usually standing at my work for 8 hours
And my income is about $270
But I don't nag because I know most of Iranians are the same
You are a real Patriot..I salute you my friend..Not like the fake account that is dedicated to bilitteling Iran 24/7..But I don't nag
You should add this to the made in Iran thread.