Iranian Chill Thread

[Hack-Hook]

You were still under Arab centuries beyond Buyad but that is not important.. What is important is the claim itself getting passed thru the UNSC..

Go read history. From saffarian we didn't recognized Arabs and before Islam they were paying tribute to us

 

[Shawnee]

Aaayaa in emkaanesh hast ke amrica in ghol ra be rousiye daadeh ke kaari nakoneh, ta rousiye ra be oukraayn bekesheh vali haalaa ke rousiyeh dar baatlaagh e oukraayn hast, mikhaad rous ha ra tahrim kone?
moshaabeh e in kaar ra amrica ba saddam dar mored e koweit kard. avval ghol daad ke kaari zed e araagh nakoneh, ba'd ke saddam koweit ra gereft, khod e amrica be saddam hamleh kard.
Dar vaaghe' manzouram in hast ke rous haa gool e amrica ra khordand va mahmoud ham khodesh in harf ha ra jouri be goushesh resoundand ke hamin goul ra khordeh?

Welcome back. Long time no see

 

[Hack-Hook]

Camel eating cotten seeds? is that an Iranian phrase

Yes.
It means somebody has pointless and unreachable daydreaming
It somehow equal to "A Cat dream of mice"

 

[Xerxes22]

Russia launched 160 missiles in the initial salvo. I'm pretty sure they destroyed more than 4 fighter jets. Recently I saw one picture which showed half a dozen or so MIG-29s completely destroyed on the ground.

Iran's military doctrine is based on defense and deterrence, which is completely different than the Russian doctrine. The goal is to inflict so much damage and casualties onto the enemy that it becomes too costly to continue waging war.

100+ missile strikes daily focusing on vital infrastructure including communications, command and control, industrial facilities, etc would be devastating on anyone but especially for a regional adversary.

You see the war in Yemen. The Houthis never launch more than a dozen or so missiles at the most. Imagine if they could launch 100 missiles daily on Saudi targets. I'm pretty sure the war would have ended a long time ago. The Saudis would have been forced to stop. How long has it been ? 7 years ? 100 missiles a day would have been 255,000+ targets. Again war is not a sprint but rather a marathon.

Too costly to continue waging war? Have you seen the lies propagated by the western social media empire in this Ukraine Russia conflict? 90% of the world population are liberal trendies
who's memory goes back only 48 hrs.

Who do u think they will support Wen America is imposed high costs during the war and then they use the nuke and say they did it cuz Iran was about to use secret nukes against Europe and America? The mass brainwashed people won't give a crap about Iran in that case. Point is America can use nukes because they will be able to control the reaction 100% in their favour..."Iran tried to launch nukes towards London, Paris and Washington...we had to do Wat we did to save lives". Saying that will be enuf and the moronic western public will not give a dam if Iran gets blown to hell or not. Instead people wud be praising the quickness of reaction of the military hierarchy in neutralizing Iranian nukes and saving Europe and America.

So my point is if the cost is too high, America will be able to find a way around it with its nukes and will use it and propagate a lie. The disgusting social media is controlled by western bots and the people dance to whatever tune it plays. There's alot to learn from this conflict. America can use nukes, spread a lie and get away with it.

Cost too high is never good enuf for any scenario. You wanna leave the very existence of any country based on "Cost too high"? Then that country won't survive long.

 

[Xerxes22]

W

I could see them being cornered into the western part starting from the Yellow line and I could see Zelenskyy remaining ruler there but it will rise this small country with approx 20-25m as 2/3 will migrate from the east and come here and the reason it will rise is because the west will bump alot of money into it and I could perhaps also see them joining NATO gaining nuclear weapons etc etc.. They will enter the phase that is called the fight back

What language are you speaking? You make absolutely no sense at all.

WTF is this guy saying. I can't understand a damn thing. Hey man, where the hell are you from BTW?

 

[TheImmortal]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1498812869181325314

 

[Xerxes22]

This just goes to show that you are still juvenile



Perhaps time to reconquer Iran and take back our beloved Iran from the Mullahs.. We will re-purify it

Purify how? By sucking on America's lollipop like the Saudi fat traitors?

Guys, you see the difference between us and these morons? Their level of 4th grade intelligence evidently proves that we are in the right morally. Our cause is just. Because these 4th graders are literally madmen.

Look at wat nonsense they are talking. It's like the barbarians talking to Alexander *they talked and talked but Alexander cudnt make sense of a word*. What do we expect from people who support traitor Saudi Arabia. We expect them to be smart and intelligent?

This Is how they supposed to be like. Absolute madmen who try to make sense out of total utter gobshite nonsense. Don't talk to these morons. Do not reply to any of these fools. They are not worth our response. Let these idiot mumble their gibberish and then go away.

 

[sha ah]

The Russian pockets are merging and the noose keeps tightening. I'm not sure why the conflict even had to come to this. Do the Russians have to take Kiev and Kharkiv for the Ukrainians to respect them ? Why can't Ukraine just be a neutral country and trade with both east and west ? Honestly the Kiev government had 7 years to accept peace terms but they seem to be extremely stubborn. Very sad.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1498812869181325314

 

[sha ah]

Don't compare apples and oranges. Hamas only controls the Gaza strip, which is puny and therefore its easy for the Israelis to target and eliminate launch sites. Israel has support from the US, NATO countries and they receive satellite intelligence. Hamas also has a limited inventory. The Israelis know this.

Ukraine launching 100 ballistic missiles a day on Russia wouldn't work because
a) Russia has a potent and diverse air defense network
b) Russia is HUGE, it's the largest country in the world

On the other hand, Iran launching 100 missiles a day on any regional adversary would work. Iran has a combination of mobile launchers and static launchers which are hidden deep underground, in fortified bunkers, which are underneath mountain ranges. Iran also has a pretty potent air defense network. Any regional adversary will have a hard time preventing Iran from continually launching missiles on a daily basis. 100 missiles a day, after one month that's 3000 strikes potentially. Aside from that Iran also has 1000 drones in its inventory. That will deter any regional country from attacking Iran.

Hamas has BM's and big once also but that is not important it is about passing thru. They don't do much damage saturation will be limited. The launching sites itself could be eliminated.

It will not deter someone who has set his mind on waging a conventional war hence it has zero deterence factor to it. Example if Ukraine started launching 100 BMs into Russia and lets assume 4-5 of 100 gets thru the S-400 do you think this will deter Russia? Because there is already war? Hence it has zero deterence

 

[Dragons]

Don't compare apples and oranges. Hamas only controls the Gaza strip, which is puny and therefore its easy for the Israelis to target and eliminate launch sites. Israel has support from the US, NATO countries and they receive satellite intelligence. Hamas also has a limited inventory. The Israelis know this.

Ukraine launching 100 ballistic missiles a day on Russia wouldn't work because
a) Russia has a potent and diverse air defense network
b) Russia is HUGE, it's the largest country in the world

On the other hand, Iran launching 100 missiles a day on any regional adversary would work. Iran has a combination of mobile launchers and static launchers which are hidden deep underground, in fortified bunkers, which are underneath mountain ranges. Iran also has a pretty potent air defense network. Any regional adversary will have a hard time preventing Iran from continually launching missiles on a daily basis. 100 missiles a day, after one month that's 3000 strikes potentially. Aside from that Iran also has 1000 drones in its inventory. That will deter any regional country from attacking Iran.

Lol at Russia has a potent and diverse air defense network.. By that it shows you don't know anything about ADS. The best in the world ADS is in the regional and it is western ADS system networks. Russia doesn't even have remotely as good ADS.

Some will get thru around 5-7% the rest will be highly probably intercepted and even if they were all landed they won't deter an Army launching an offensive in a real life war scenario hence it is basically as fruitless as 15 year old virgin and taking 100 BMs in a vaste area per day will do insignificiant amount. It will have zero outcome and a big fat zero. They are limited use even in Ukraine very limited while Russia is trying to change reality on the ground and their airforce haven't gained superiority over the air which has complicated things for them.

Not freaking BMs but Russian conventional forces are eagerly trying to change reality on the ground and that is how it is done never ever assume BMs as deterence in actual war time because they are not deterence whatsoever and your military understanding needs to get better.

If it was in actual war time then Iran will bear the burnt of it as they will gain air superiority leading to damaging of ADS and bearing the way for ground conventional forces landing on several access including land incursions within 48 hours. They wil try to fight inside Iran inch for inch this is the classical way of war. Total defeat or nothing which means basically conquering attempt example look at Russia it is going for the throat and it is not looking for a limited war because it is conducting classical warfare which seeks 100% victory and this is how wars are fought they end up in someone getting conquered entirely even tho if someone doesn't seek to conquer like Russia they are doing the whole conquering thingy as per doctrine and the same counts here even tho if they may not seek to take over lands they by default will have to mount a fully conquering conclusion because it is a means to an end ''Doctrine'' which is universal

 

[sha ah]

One theory as to why the Russian military has chosen to deploy older equipment and less capable units to Ukraine first ? Perhaps expecting to sustain some losses, especially in the early stages, they want to avoid having their best equipment fall into enemy hands since they could very well be handed over to NATO ?

Belarus seems to be poised to send troops into Ukraine and directly join the fighting. In the last 24 hours Russians seem to be escalating their bombing campaign, now targeting government buildings and vital infrastructure along with continued attacks military targets in multiple cities. Too many targets to list.

Missile attack targets police station in Kharkiv

https://twitter.com/x/status/1498909884057800705

Russians capture the southern city of Kherson along with its river port

https://twitter.com/x/status/1498867200920375297

Nightly shelling in Kharkiv after multiple missile strikes during the day

https://twitter.com/x/status/1498693577811152898

TOR system damaged and left on the field

https://twitter.com/x/status/1498634962123345923

 

[Muhammad Saftain Anjum]

potent air defense network

Recent wars have proved that air defence systems are very vulnerable to UAVs specially with the development of strike UCAVs like indian Ghatak ,air defence systems will be first priority targets in combined warfare.

regional adversary

Who are your regional enemies?

 

[sha ah]

10 houses destroyed, several killed in Russian airstrike on Zhytomyr

https://twitter.com/x/status/1498785759851167746

Huge explosion reported in Zhytomyr, hospital damaged

https://twitter.com/x/status/1498771736585715714

Russian artillery now targeting Mariupol in the south

https://twitter.com/x/status/1498698046787526656

Two residential buildings in Kiev destroyed. Russians are not hesitating to target resistance even in residential areas.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1498681921014054917

Russians troops take northern town of Kupyansk

https://twitter.com/x/status/1498602706491035648

destroyed Russian convoy near Kiev

https://twitter.com/x/status/1498911904999354369

Depends on how robust the air defense network is. It's definitely better to have air defense as opposed to not having it.

Yes UAVs are effective. This is why Iran has 1000+ UAVs in its inventory.

Regional adversaries when talking about Iran refers to any regional entity that could hypothetically attack Iran.

Recent wars have proved that air defence systems are very vulnerable to UAVs specially with the development of strike UCAVs like indian Ghatak ,air defence systems will be first priority targets in combined warfare.

Who are your regional enemies?

 

[sha ah]

"West wants to fight Russia to to the last Ukrainian"

 

[sha ah]

Biden confuses Ukrainian with Iranian in state of the union address.

"Ukraine victim of US policies"