Shapur got banned for that. You didn't get banned for it. So, I think you have no reason to complain about how things went.
I'm genuinely interested in discovering the rationale presiding over the decision to leave his provocative thread against Islam stay while the one I created was deleted, despite the fact that my aim was to discuss the oligarchy's attack against every community - Zoroastrians being just one example particularly relevant to Iranians, hence susceptible of having them pay greater attention to the overall problematic. Not complaining, only genuinely enquiring for information.
The reason I ask is above all because my follow on comment in reply to user adonis, did include a synthetic yet comprehensive exposure of the global oligarchy's project in the realm of society and culture. That post, which I was particularly happy with, got lost in the process, which is quite a pity.
As for Zoroastrians, please do not come here and insult Iranians. Zoroastrians are Iranian people and we do not appreciate it.
Didn't insult anyone. Had you read my comprehensive follow on comment alluded to above, you'd understand what the aim of the topic was.
Besides, it was "Shapur Zol Aktaf" who started this with his brazen double standards and disingenious attempts to portray Muslim and Islamic oriented Iranians as somehow apologetic towards "Jews". He adopts an extremely harsh tone against the Islamic Republic for failing to prevent the martyrdom of hajj Qassem and the act of sabotage at Natanz - as if resistance against bloodthirsty enemies as powerful and malicious as the zio-American axis comes for free and can be achieved without casualties, and as if hajj Qassem was not a practicing Muslim himself. At the same time, he minimizes the threat posed by Netanyahu to Iran's very existence and claims the zionist entity is practically invincible.
If you cannot see the blatant, shameless contradiction nor the hazardous nature of this type of ranting, in which another user (namely "Cthulu") is actively engaged as well, then I'd warmly invite you to carefully and honestly think about it. I'm confident that you are intelligent enough to realize how dangerous a generalization of this stance is for Iran's survival.
He seems to defend Iranians on other threads, but he apparently defends only the Islamic regime of Iran, not Iran.
I'm again confident once more that you are intelligent enough to discern the fact that the fate of Iran, her civilization, her people and the fate of the Islamic Republic (there's no "regime" in Iran, please don't reproduce the propagandistic terminology and code-words in use by western and zionist-controlled media) happen to be inextricably glued together, whether one likes it or not.
So defending the IR in present circumstances equals defending Iran, because the regime change agenda of the zio-American block aims not only at toppling the IR but also at destroying the country and its territorial integrity for good (much like the same cabal managed to destroy Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Sudan, Somalia, Libya etc).
This is something Iranians would gain in considering, just as they would gain to understand that nonstop bickering and lashing out at the IR or its leadership (more than they actually lash out at Iran's main enemies, and by that I mean not second-rate puppet regimes and useful idiots of Tel Aviv and Washington, but Tel Aviv and Washington themselves) are not going to be of any help to Iran, on the contrary this kind of mindset will only serve Iran's existential enemies, those whose goal is not just to "regime change" but to wipe Iran off the civilizational and geographical maps.
To me, such attitudes tend to show that the propaganda of Iran's enemies, whether spread by BBC/VOA/Manoto/Saudi International or by "social media" and the internet, has been successful insofar as it influences even some of the more patriotic but secularist Iranians aware of the fact that the west and Isra"el" are hostile to their people and nation, considering that these same media and their creeping, nefarious influence have managed to set the standards by turning IR-bashing into a norm among said segments of Iranian public opinion.
His loyalty is not to all Iranians. But to a select few.
Because when you guys deride IRGC officers, proceed to ill-wishing your Leader or take aim at Muslim Iranians like "Shapur Zol Aktaf" does (while trying to hijack the memory of Qassem Soleimani or Iran's nuclear scientists, all pious Muslims actually, to further his agenda) you are being "loyal to all Iranians"? Are you sure?
He is a suicide bomber. Pretty sure of this.
Insult + libel, reported.
