What's new

Iranian BMs were launched at Ain Assad: Fars News

So were the BMs too powerful or were the bunkers poorly made? Or maybe bunkers are not effective agaisnt BMs?


shock wave was too powerful and that was just from warhead impact at mach 4-5 speed not explosive warhead which they had none if they were full then shock wave would have killed everyone at close proximity of the impact site i have seen people getting killed just from ballistic missile shock waves alone.
 
.
shock wave was too powerful and that was just from warhead impact at mach 4-5 speed not explosive warhead which they had none if they were full then shock wave would have killed everyone at close proximity of the impact site i have seen people getting killed just from ballistic missile shock waves alone.
The missiles were not equiped with explosives ?
 
.
shock wave was too powerful and that was just from warhead impact at mach 4-5 speed not explosive warhead which they had none if they were full then shock wave would have killed everyone at close proximity of the impact site i have seen people getting killed just from ballistic missile shock waves alone.

looks like there is no defense against BMs. Good for Irans deterrence and offensive capabilities. But bad news for every civilian. If war breaks out no one is safe from BMs
 
.
The missiles were not equiped with explosives ?

the pattern of destruction shows they were not, if you look at Iran - Iraq war and you can see the real power of missile warheads then if you compare the two you can clearly see that Iranian missiles here did not had much of an explosive in them


dezful-bombing.jpg


681074_785.jpg


48307.jpg


looks like there is no defense against BMs. Good for Irans deterrence and offensive capabilities. But bad news for every civilian. If war breaks out no one is safe from BMs

there really is not and we have lived through that for 8 years
 
. .
Dozens of americans have been killed.
No one was killed.

I think this Iranian response was smart because they killed soleimani in Iraq and not Iran so what Iran need to do is playing their game by assassinating American officials military and intelligence I think that’s the reason why there are no American generals in Iraq travel outside their bases also the Iraqi militias are using the same tactics that forced the British to withdrew by attacking their bases with rockets. The neocon scum would love to see Iran directly attacking them so they can start war but Iranians can use covert operations and proxies to do that just when they killed the higher ranking CIA in Afghanistan.
 
.
No one was killed.

I think this Iranian response was smart because they killed soleimani in Iraq and not Iran so what Iran need to do is playing their game by assassinating American officials military and intelligence I think that’s the reason why there are no American generals in Iraq travel outside their bases also the Iraqi militias are using the same tactics that forced the British to withdrew by attacking their bases with rockets. The neocon scum would love to see Iran directly attacking them so they can start war but Iranians can use covert operations and proxies to do that just when they killed the higher ranking CIA in Afghanistan.
Iran is killing their soldiers now in Iraq and it will continue. After 2010-2011 Iran ceased to go after US military but it has changed now. Iranian venom will still sting during Trump and long after.

Dumbest American move in perhaps the last 15 years. Bunch of idiots.
 
.
Iran is killing their soldiers now in Iraq and it will continue. After 2010-2011 Iran ceased to go after US military but it has changed now. Iranian venom will still sting during Trump and long after.

Dumbest American move in perhaps the last 15 years. Bunch of idiots.
Yeah I know but not directly these necon scums and their donkey orange clown they could have killed soleimani and denied it just like with Omar mughanya instead they made big deal of it. The Iranian direct response from Iranian soil didn’t kill any American but the proxies and covert operations are doing that.
 
.
No one was killed.

I think this Iranian response was smart because they killed soleimani in Iraq and not Iran so what Iran need to do is playing their game by assassinating American officials military and intelligence I think that’s the reason why there are no American generals in Iraq travel outside their bases also the Iraqi militias are using the same tactics that forced the British to withdrew by attacking their bases with rockets. The neocon scum would love to see Iran directly attacking them so they can start war but Iranians can use covert operations and proxies to do that just when they killed the higher ranking CIA in Afghanistan.

Iran will kill them with proxies, it should not be linked to us.



France withdrawing its forces from Iraq


https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/france-armed-forces-withdraw-iraq-report


 
. .
U.S professor Jeffrey Lewis analysis of Iran IRGC missile strike on U.S military base Ain Al-Assad in Iraq
 
.
Troops who suffered traumatic brain injuries dismissed by Trump expected to receive Purple Hearts

Updated 1847 GMT (0247 HKT) April 28, 2020

200113093539-iraq-al-asad-base-rocket-1-exlarge-169.jpg


(CNN)Dozens of US military personnel are expected to receive Purple Hearts in recognition of traumatic brain injuries they suffered in a January Iranian missile attack in Iraq, according to three US defense officials.

The officials describe the decision as extremely sensitive because of the attention the issue received after President Donald Trump dismissed the injuries as "not very serious," when they were first reported.
The Pentagon and Trump initially said no service members were injured or killed in the attack on al Asad air base but it subsequently became clear that many sustained traumatic brain injuries after blast waves from the Iranian explosions hit the bunkers they were sheltering in.
The number of TBI cases rose steadily in the weeks after the attack to 110, according to the Defense Department.

It's not clear how many of those service members will receive the award because the review of the proposed Purple Heart cases has not been completed.
"The Purple Heart submissions remain under review and are being processed in accordance with Defense Department and Military Service regulations. Upon completion, service members entitled to receive the Purple Heart will be notified by their leadership," Jessica Maxwell, a Defense Department spokeswoman told CNN.
The awards are in a "final stage" of review by the US led coalition in Iraq that commands all US forces there. Once they pass that stage a final decision will be made at the Pentagon.
Behind the scenes the three defense officials described the situation as extremely sensitive because of the attention the issue received after Trump downplayed the significance of the injuries. With the Purple Hearts pending, the awards are getting internal attention from senior Pentagon personnel, according to the defense officials. It is not clear how much the Defense Department will publicize the awards when they are made, officials say.
When the first reports about the injuries emerged, Trump said he didn't not consider potential brain injuries to be as serious as physical combat wounds.

During the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Trump was asked to explain the discrepancy between his previous comments that no US service member was harmed and reports of US troops being treated for injuries suffered in the attack.
"No, I heard that they had headaches, and a couple of other things, but I would say, and I can report, it's not very serious," Trump replied during a news conference.
Asked about the President's comments, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper said Trump "understands the nature of these injuries."
Since 2011 the Defense Department has had a policy of awarding Purple Hearts for service members who suffer from traumatic brain injuries which are often called the silent wound of war.
To qualify for the award the injury must be severe enough to require treatment by a medical officer which may limit the number awarded following the January attack because the Pentagon indicated many troops suffered from mild cases.
The Purple Heart dates back to George Washington and is given to those wounded or killed in combat.

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/28/politics/traumatic-brain-injuries-purple-hearts/index.html

They get medals for shitting in their pants.

The number of deaths is still hidden by american government.
 
.
Trump’s threat to Iran has a hollow ring
Ongoing anti-Tehran rhetoric looks to be a distraction from the failure to tackle Covid-19 competently
by MK Bhadrakumar May 2, 2020
000_1QR1ZV-e1588395183319.jpg

This US Navy photo shows Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGCN) vessels conducting unsafe and unprofessional actions against the guided-missile destroyer USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60) and other US military ships. Photo: AFP
A tweet by US President Donald Trump on April 22 said, “I have instructed the United States Navy to shoot down and destroy any and all Iranian gunboats if they harass our ships at sea.” Trump seems to be talking the language of war while indulging in politics by other means. Like his ban on immigration, he is resorting to distractions to turn attention away from his incompetence in tackling the Covid-19 crisis in the United States.

A Time report while referring to the tweet said, “The White House had no immediate comment. The US Navy’s Bahrain-based 5th Fleet referred questions about the tweet to the Pentagon, and the Pentagon referred questions to the White House.”

Meanwhile, Tehran was plainly dismissive. The spokesman for the Iranian armed forces, Brigadier-General Abolfazl Shekarchi, said disdainfully, “Instead of bullying others today, Americans should put their efforts into saving their forces who have contracted [the] coronavirus.”

Trump was ostensibly reacting to an allegation by the US Navy on April 15 that 11 Iranian vessels had “repeatedly conducted dangerous and harassing approaches against multiple US naval ships operating in international waters.” Speedboats belonging to the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Navy (IRGCN) apparently came too close to a squadron of US warships sailing close to Iranian waters.



These warships included the expeditionary mobile base vessel Lewis B Puller – a ship designed to serve as a platform for a US invasion – the Paul Hamilton, a guided-missile destroyer, two coastal patrol boats and two Coast Guard ships.

The US Navy statement said, “The IRGCN’s dangerous and provocative actions increased the risk of miscalculation and collision … and were not in accordance with the obligation under international law to act with due regard for the safety of other vessels in the area.”

The Iranians then released a video on April 19 that showed the IRGCN warning off a flotilla of US warships in the Persian Gulf as they tried to approach Iranian territorial waters. After the Iranian warning, the US ships apparently moved away.

Such incidents are not uncommon and the two sides know how to de-escalate. Trump had no reason to meddle. He must be really out of his mind to kickstart a military conflict in the Middle East over such incidents at this point when the United States’ Arab Gulf allies are preoccupied with Covid-19.


In fact, the specter of an ever-widening spread of the coronavirus among American sailors haunts the US Navy too. The US aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt is detained in the Pacific Island of Guam, its crew was quarantined after hundreds of its sailors tested positive.

Three other aircraft carriers, the Nimitz, the Ronald Reagan and the Carl Vinson, have also been docked in ports because of sailors testing positive, while a fourth, the Truman, is being kept at sea for fear that its crew will become infected if it comes into port.

Former Navy secretary Ray Mabus, who held the post from 2009 to 2017, said last month, “I think what they need to do is bring every ship in.… Offload most of the crew … leave a very skeletal force on board, sanitize the ship, quarantine people for two weeks, make sure nobody’s got Covid.” After that, he added, crews would have to be kept on the ships indefinitely until the pandemic is mitigated.

Arguably, Iran is not spoiling for a fight either as it emerges from the pandemic. The struggle took a heavy toll; more than 6,000 people died. In reality, what unnerves Washington is that Iran weathered the storm despite the United States’ “maximum pressure” approach.


The Trump administration even obstructed an Iranian request for a US$5 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to fight Covid-19, although Iran was the regional epicenter of the pandemic and dozens of frontline health workers and health-care professionals died because of non-availability of personal protective equipment, and shortages of medicines and medical devices, including respirators.

The United Nations, the European Union, Russia and China have called on the US to ease sanctions. Even within the US, Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden joined members of Congress in urging the Trump administration to suspend sanctions on Iran. But all that fell on a stony heart. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo kept advancing the argument that Iran would divert IMF funds away from coronavirus relief and toward weapons-of-mass-destruction programs.

Thus the Trump administration watched with shock and awe when on April 22, a three-stage Qased rocket lifted off from the Markazi Desert in central Iran and successfully delivered a military reconnaissance satellite to orbit 425 kilometers above Earth’s surface. By doing so, Iran joined an elite club of superpowers with the capability to launch a military satellite using combined fuel in satellite carriers.

The commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), Major-General Hossein Salami, said, “Today, we can visualize the world from space, and this means extending the strategic intelligence of the powerful defense force, the IRGC.” All parts of the system, including the carrier and satellite, were produced by the Iranian scientists, and the message behind this important achievement is that sanctions are not an obstacle to Iran’s progress.

Clearly, Trump has run out of options. Looking back, he made a ghastly mistake to order the murder of the Quds Force commander General Qasem Soleimani in January. The months since the incident took place go to show that Trump’s decision turned out to be a strategic blunder.

Soleimani’s murder has not exactly strengthened Trump’s prospects for the presidential election in November; it has not weakened Iran’s resolve in leading the “axis of resistance” in Syria and Iraq; but it has weakened the United States’ standing in Iraq. Most important, Iran’s attitude toward the Trump administration has hardened.

Iranian diplomacy, which was low-key in the last couple of months, has shifted gear as the country emerges from the Covid-19 crisis. Foreign Minister Javad Zarif paid a visit to Damascus on April 20; Soleimani’s successor Esmail Ghaani was in Baghdad. During his meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, Zarif said that Iran’s “path in support of the resistance” remained unwavering.

Meanwhile, Iran has switched to a proactive policy toward Afghanistan. Tehran’s key interlocutor and veteran Afghan hand, Mohammad Ebrahim Taherian, visited Kabul on April 20. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Seyed Abbas Mousavi on this occasion said in Tehran:

“Iran’s efforts are independent and within the framework of the interests of the Afghan government and nation. We hope that our efforts would yield results, an inclusive government would be formed in Afghanistan, stability and calm would return to Afghanistan, and then intra-Afghan talks would be held.”

Tehran has so far allowed a free hand to Washington but is now stepping in to try to consolidate the forces of Afghan nationalism who are incensed over the United States’ prescriptive approach. From April 12 to April 15, Zarif held consultations regarding Afghanistan with his counterparts in Kabul, Ankara, Beijing, New Delhi, Moscow and Doha.

Tehran is determined to challenge Washington’s self-appointed role to navigate an Afghan settlement. The eviction of US presence in Iraq and Afghanistan has become top priority in Iran’s regional strategies.

This article was produced in partnership by Indian Punchline and Globetrotter, a project of the Independent Media Institute, which provided it to Asia Times.

MK Bhadrakumar is a former Indian diplomat.

Asia Times Financial is now live. Linking accurate news, insightful analysis and local knowledge with the ATF China Bond 50 Index, the world's first benchmark cross sector Chinese Bond Indices. Read ATF now.

https://asiatimes.com/2020/05/trumps-threat-to-iran-has-a-hollow-ring/
 
.
No, it’s called deescalation. This was a face saving operation for Iran, and a pathetic one at that. It was Iran’s off ramp. Honestly, I expected more from Iran. After all, we openly assasinated Soleimani.
Just wait Jesus worshiping infidel
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom