Stop writing nonsense and wasting my time. You are just trolling. You can't look past history, genetics etc. just because you can't take the fact that you are from the Central Asian Steppe (if you are a Persian) and not us Arabs or Semites who are native to the beautiful and ancient Middle East. There is nothing more to add. I provided genetic and historical evidence already. This is all widely known and I am not inventing the wheel.
Arabs nor Semites are or were Africans unless 50.000 + years ago like anyone else in the region. Including you.
Stop your obsession with Blacks. Were you beat up by one? I am not Black nor are Arabs or Semites that. Short your issues out with actual Africans or people from Congo that you seem to have a problem with. Nothing more to add.
Also you don't understand the difference between actual genetics and ancestry and linguistics. Two different things. Approximately 66% of all Arabs belong to the Haplogroup J which is NATIVE to the Middle East and is nearly 50.000 years old. Remaining haplogroups are not African either.
An interesting observation is that the "Arab" cluster is slightly more distant to all African clusters than the European/W Asian cluster is. This might seem perplexing as geography might dictate that it should be closer to the African clusters.
http://dienekes.blogspot.dk/2010/10/african-admixture-in-near-east-where.html
Indeed I suspect that a Congolese black man beat you up in the Netherlands or something worse, LOL.
Hilarious.
Anyway with all your African talk and Congo talk you made me look that country up. It looks awesome. Nearly 6.000 meters tall mountains, most greenery in the world, amazing wild life and nature etc. Quite beautiful and interesting. Much like Africa as a continent over all.
@
al-Hasani :
allah knows that i hate no one, since u sarcasticaly called me arab lover, i gotta tell u that not only
thats not true but also i love arab PEOPLE like yourself, any way back to topic:
bro, as i said i have no respect for shah; he was a us puppet, brutal derranged a$$hole which killed his own people
my point was that he is better than arab leaders , nothing more
but since u mentioned that arab leaders have been ruling arabs since the christ!!!
i gotta tell u that makes them worst!!!! u have to implement a severe brutality to be able to supress people that long
if your ancestors have ruled whole world , that dosent make u an important or even good person
what makes u good is your behavior
Well, you are a good Iranian Azeri. I know that a lot of Iranians like and love Arabs. After all there are 2 million Arabs in Iran. Hundred thousands if not millions of Iranian pilgrims of all ethnic groups go to Arab lands each year.
How was he better than Arab leaders? Visit any Arab country, especially the GCC for a few days and say that. People in UAE, Qatar etc. live better than anywhere in the Muslim world and among the best in the world and have more rights than anywhere else in the Muslim world.
Stop reading
PISSTV and try to get your news about the Arab world from other sources than that.
What long? Hashemites etc. and other rulers got their legitimacy not through brutality but their deeds, ancestry, respect etc. They were not more brutal than all other leaders at the time. In fact much better because they did not kill people based on religion, ancestry etc. like most rulers did in Europe at one point in history or another.
I agree. Never said that Arabs are better than anyone else or that the rulers are more special than other Arabs. I am just saying that they have a legitimacy. Much more than the Pahlavi's had before they proclaimed themselves as Shah's in 1925.
Besides all those rulers will be toppled if they cannot behave. The world is evolving quickly.
