Iran to Target NATO Missile Shield in Turkey if attacked

[Arian]

In the Iran-Iraqi war they kept attacking our civilian ships and sinking them. And what I found to be even more surprising was Persians here actually being proud of it. I guess it is to be expected given how Racist and Self-centered they are.

It's because your oil tankers were helping Iraq to export its oil, after the operation Morvarid, almost 80% of the Iraqi naval fleet were destroyed, so they had problems escorting their oil tankers and Iran wanted to exert pressure on Iraq by choking off its oil exports but you Arabs helped them to export their oil under your flag. That's why Iran started attacking your oil tankers. just FYI Mosa.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Morvarid

 

[Abii]

In the Iran-Iraqi war they kept attacking our civilian ships and sinking them. And what I found to be even more surprising was Persians here actually being proud of it. I guess it is to be expected given how Racist and Self-centered they are.

lmao

so we're not allowed to sink your ships when you're bankrolling the country that is invading us (saddam hosain).
Are you okay Mosa? Your condition seems to be getting worse and worse everyday.

 

[Mosamania]

It's because your oil tankers were helping Iraq to export its oil, after the operation Morvarid, almost 80% of the Iraqi naval fleet were destroyed, so they had problems escorting their oil tankers and Iran wanted to exert pressure on Iraq by choking off its oil exports but you Arabs helped them to export their oil under your flag. That's why Iran started attacking your oil tankers. just FYI Mosa.

Operation Morvarid - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Actually no many ships that took off from our eastern border not Iraqi and UAE coasts were sunk by Iran we established an Air Force line to defend the ships and the result was Iran never attacking Civilian ships again.

 

[Arian]

Actually no many ships that took off from our eastern border not Iraqi and UAE coasts were sunk by Iran we established an Air Force line to defend the ships and the result was Iran never attacking Civilian ships again.

lol. Is that why they teach you in Saudi Arabia? Iran kept attacking your ships and other tiny Arab states' ships until the USA directly got involved in the war and attacked Iranian Navy and we fought several wars after that. read some history next time please.

 

[Mosamania]

lmao

so we're not allowed to sink your ships when you're bankrolling the country that is invading us (saddam hosain).
Are you okay Mosa? Your condition seems to be getting worse and worse everyday.

We started helping Saddam as a result of the war and the war was not a result of the help. Iranians saw themselves as "Fighting Arabs" did not matter nationality or anything just kill whatever Arab you find all of them are enemies. So naturally we will respond with a heavy hand to a crazy enemy who can not differentiate between blues and reds. But I can see why they thought that, looking at how racist and sick you are it is easily understandable.

 

[Abii]

Actually no many ships that took off from our eastern border not Iraqi and UAE coasts were sunk by Iran we established an Air Force line to defend the ships and the result was Iran never attacking Civilian ships again.

good for you
I will send you a cookie to desert 1111, post box 23, sandistan
Now kindly explain to me wtf you're doing here? Nobody brough arabistan up during the discussions.

 

[Mosamania]

lol. Is that why they teach you in Saudia? Iran kept attacking your ships and other tiny Arab states' ships until the USA directly got involved in the war and attacked Iranian Navy and we fought several wars after that. read some history next time please.

Is that what they teach you in Iran?? Iran kept attacking tiny Arab ships so they cried to the US to get here?? It was our Air Force that shot down two of your F-4s on a mission to sink more civilian ships after that the operations stopped. I guess the Iranians never imagined those "Tiny Arabs" would kick their ***.

And I know about the civilian air liner incident and the failed Iranian navy operation so don't go there.

 

[Desert Fox]

good for you
I will send you a cookie to desert 1111, post box 23, sandistan
Now kindly explain to me wtf you're doing here? Nobody brough arabistan up during the discussions.

The amount of personal attacks in your post is appalling.

 

[Arian]

Is that what they teach you in Iran?? Iran kept attacking tiny Arab ships so they cried to the US to get here?? It was our Air Force that shot down two of your F-4s on a mission to sink more civilian ships after that the operations stopped. I guess the Iranians never imagined those "Tiny Arabs" would kick their ***.

And I know about the civilian air liner incident and the failed Iranian navy operation so don't go there.

It's no surprise that F-15's have shut down two F-4's, at the end F-15's are interceptors and have been designed for air superiority while F-4 is only a bomber. Those tiny Arabs as slaves of the USA cried to their daddy and their daddy came and helped them.

n December 1986, the government of Kuwait asked the Reagan administration to send the U.S. Navy to protect Kuwaiti tankers against Iranian attacks.[2] U.S. law forbade the use of Navy ships to escort civilian vessels under a foreign flag, so the Kuwaiti ships were re-registered under the U.S. flag. Even before Earnest Will formally began, it became clear how dangerous Persian Gulf operations would be. On 17 May, an Iraqi F-1 Mirage fired two Exocet missiles at the guided missile frigate USS Stark, killing 37 sailors and injuring 21. Iraqi officials said the targeting of the U.S. warship was accidental.[1][3][4][5]

And no, That's not what they teach us in Iran, that's what has been written in many reputable sources.

 

[Quasar]

I guess both countries are doing what they have to!
Iran has the right to have missiles for having deterrence against her enemies!(it is her only option)
the problem is we are not THE ENEMY but it might be a threat to us as well! its simply an unavoidable result! and in return we have the right to be a part of the missile shield! (no missile= no missile shield is needed for us) this is where the problem lays!
iran has an option(not a wise one though) to attack us ! but still the first part of the premise is if Iran attacked
and if but only if what Iran wants is to drag us in to the war! we have the right to retaliate!

 

[Mosamania]

good for you
I will send you a cookie to desert 1111, post box 23, sandistan
Now kindly explain to me wtf you're doing here? Nobody brough arabistan up during the discussions.

This is where I live you douche:

does this look like a Fu desert to you?? But then again you are nothing but a Racist blind stereotyping Persian so expecting anything from you is a a fool's quest.

Oh and in winter this happens too

so keep you mouth shut racist

---------- Post added at 01:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:40 AM ----------

The amount of personal attacks in your post is appalling.

It is to be expected from a Racist superiority complex Persian.

 

[Mosamania]

It's no surprise that F-15's have shut down two F-4's, at the end F-15's are interceptors and have been designed for air superiority while F-4 is only a bomber. Those tiny Arabs as slaves of the USA cried to their daddy and their daddy came and helped them.



And no, That's not what they teach us in Iran, that's what has been written in many reputable sources.

We shot down your jets in 1984. I guess poor Kuwaitis still got their ships harassed by Iran for a longer time. If anything this proves that Iran considered itself fighting "Arabs" not "Iraqis".

The Gulf states were especially inclined to fear an Iranian victory after Khomeini announced that monarchy was an illegitimate and un-Islamic form of government.[65] Khomeini's statement was widely understood as a call for the overthrow of the Gulf monarchies.[65] Both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia had less than friendly relations with Iraq before 1982, and the reluctant decision to support Iraq was taken only because the consequences of an Iranian victory were considered worse than the continued existence of Saddam's regime.[66] The British journalists John Bulloch and Harvey Morris wrote:
"The virulent Iranian campaign, which at its peak seemed to be making the overthrow of the Saudi regime a war aim on a par with the defeat of Iraq, did have an effect on the Kingdom, but not the one the Iranians wanted: instead of becoming more conciliatory, the Saudis became tougher, more self-confident, and less prone to seek compromise".

As you can see it was Iran that forced us to help Saddam due to its own stupid policies.

 

[Arian]

We shot down your jets in 1984. I guess poor Kuwaitis still got their ships harassed by Iran for a longer time. If anything this proves that Iran considered itself fighting "Arabs" not "Iraqis".

The Gulf states were especially inclined to fear an Iranian victory after Khomeini announced that monarchy was an illegitimate and un-Islamic form of government.[65] Khomeini's statement was widely understood as a call for the overthrow of the Gulf monarchies.[65] Both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia had less than friendly relations with Iraq before 1982, and the reluctant decision to support Iraq was taken only because the consequences of an Iranian victory were considered worse than the continued existence of Saddam's regime.[66] The British journalists John Bulloch and Harvey Morris wrote:
"The virulent Iranian campaign, which at its peak seemed to be making the overthrow of the Saudi regime a war aim on a par with the defeat of Iraq, did have an effect on the Kingdom, but not the one the Iranians wanted: instead of becoming more conciliatory, the Saudis became tougher, more self-confident, and less prone to seek compromise".

As you can see it was Iran that forced us to help Saddam due to its own stupid policies.

I don't even care why Saudi Arabia helped Saddam, it was expected from them to help Saddam. Being ruled by a US puppet regime that is strongly anti-Persian and anti-Shiite I expected nothing else from Saudi Arabia.

But the fact is that your tankers were attacked because of helping Iraq, that's why I responded to your post, because you sounded like Iranians had no reasons to attack you and they attacked you only because they were defiant and racist.

 

[Mosamania]

I guess both countries are doing what they have to!
Iran has the right to have missiles for having deterrence against her enemies!(it is her only option)
the problem is we are not THE ENEMY but it might be a threat to us as well! its simply an unavoidable result! and in return we have the right to be a part of the missile shield! (no missile= no missile shield is needed for us) this is where the problem lays!
iran has an option(not a wise one though) to attack us ! but still the first part of the premise is if Iran attacked
and if but only if what Iran wants is to drag us in to the war! we have the right to retaliate!

They don't care EVERYONE is their enemy. Even if you don't want to get involved they drag you into it then they cry about it. This is why we are opposing any strike on Iran. Iran is a little paranoid kid everyone is against it must fight everyone everyone is plotting for its downfall everyone only thinks of me and me alone.

If the US attacks Iran they will send their missiles here and probably Turkey and force us into the fight but then cry "Collaborators Collaborators plots Zionists Puppets blah blah" When in fact it was their own mistake.

Hopefully one day Iran will have a wise government that does not make stupid decisions I don't care about US or Iran just keep us the fuc out of it.

 

[Hussein]

Mosa > why are you coming here to speak about Arabs or your country ???
this is not the subject of this thread !
pls dn't make derail this thread