Mehdipersian
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
- Messages
- 1,351
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Shahed 136 rcs compare to other aircrafts
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah to test in battle why wouldn’t they and I’m mostly referring to s 300 because that’s basically what you hear about and I’ve never read any article about s 500 being used I’m not saying bavar is going to be a game changer just saying no one has any specs on it, no matter how I feel about the war,it would only be invaluable for the Iranians to test it
Also sorry for the late reply hey I’m just a hobbyist on this site but if the Iranians test their anti aircraft weapons would only get more experience they have plenty of experience already with their drones very little with their anti aircraft except for military drills
So I wouldn’t call it fake news when now you see the drones being used only difference you done have photographic proof and the guardian is a legit organization doesn’t mean they can’t be wrong like all news agencies
Again I didn’t say s 500 I’m pretty sure they only use those to protect their most prize assets Moscow nuclear sites etc and they’re not as large numbers as the other systems and tbh honest before they would become operational in Syria Yemen and definitely in Lebanon the Israelis would blow them up in the hands of the Russians they wouldn’t blow up a bavar operated by the Russians the Israelis know everything going on in Syria through moles satellites etc etc at least in Lebanon their intelligence isn’t as great as Syria but you tell me the Iranians can ship a system that big and Israelis wouldn’t see it again it may not be true but equipping it with the Russians that it may one day be used instead of when it’s to late if the Israelis or Americans ever do decide to bomb Iran and the Israelis don’t care about Yemen just yet that’s in the distance they worry about now not tomorrowSurely Iran can battle test these on her own borders, in Syria, in Yemen, for Hezbollah or other allies before selling to a superpower. We have hardly seen any tests of this system either. Dont get me wrong, I would love for Russia to be our guinea pig, I'd also love a billion dollars in my bank account right now too! Not realistic.
Furthermore, I dont think Russia is that desperate for air defence systems to use some untested system from us, let's not kid ourselves. Drones are a different story and I'm definitely going to call any Iranian assistance to Ukraine as fake news, if that's what you meant.
Still waiting on the evidence on how Ukraine "knows" S-400 and S-500.
it means change aerodynamic , that alone enough to destroy all that , high speed bomber design . as I said , those delta wing the best could do carry two bombs , a flying wing can carry a lot more
these ucav can other uses , they can gather intelligence and stay for days in sky , your delta wing uav cant do such
there is no such thing unless you go b1-lancer or tu-160 design
DId they give any specific details or just spoke very vaguely?Ukrainian telegram channel says they are having serious difficulties due to the drones
i ask you one thing , show me a supersonic , deltawing bomberIt does not change aerodynamic anymore than adding internal weapon bay changed S-171.
S-171 only carries 2 bombs. The payload is dependent on strength of engine not wether it’s delta or flying.
Poor analysis by you as usual
not all can shoot down global hawk and not all area are contesedYes in non contested airspace. Or else they end up like TB-2 most shot down. Some got a few more punches in. But at ~6M a drone expensive scrap metal end of day.
If Iran can shoot down $300M Global Hawk using a Sayyad missile then any Iranian UCAV is able to be brought down relatively easily by an adversary fielding a competent air defense system network (Israel or US).
and no you can't those small uav of you will be in size of F-117 and that airplane was subsonic, you can dream about building 1000 uav that can carry 750km of ammunition in that size or even half it wit the price of building a single flying wing let say in size of RQ-180You can build 1000 smaller delta wing drones with payload of 1500lbs instead of building a manned bomber so it can drop 30,000+lbs
and no you can't those small uav of you will be in size of F-117 and that airplane was subsonic, you can dream about building 1000 uav that can carry 750km of ammunition in that size or even half it wit the price of building a single flying wing let say in size of RQ-180You can build 1000 smaller delta wing drones with payload of 1500lbs instead of building a manned bomber so it can drop 30,000+lbs
russia ddn't battle test S-400 or S-300 when they start selling them to the world , why we must do that , the test results are there to see, if they want they can get it , if they don't want nobody made them.Surely Iran can battle test these on her own borders, in Syria, in Yemen, for Hezbollah or other allies before selling to a superpower. We have hardly seen any tests of this system either. Dont get me wrong, I would love for Russia to be our guinea pig, I'd also love a billion dollars in my bank account right now too! Not realistic.
No detail, it was mentioned only related to the israeli anti drone systemDId they give any specific details or just spoke very vaguely?
https://****/milinfolive/90893
t. m e Diving on a target, but target is blurred
WOW
why make the attack in day so enemy can see the drone with eyes and attack them , why not do so in the nights , those drones don't even have normal camera and carry infrared ones so attacking in night is even better for them
and no you can't those small uav of you will be in size of F-117 and that airplane was subsonic, you can dream about building 1000 uav that can carry 750km of ammunition in that size or even half it wit the price of building a single flying wing let say in size of RQ-180
So what if target dispersed or moved to a shelter? or intelligence wasn't sustainable?why make the attack in day so enemy can see the drone with eyes and attack them , why not do so in the nights , those drones don't even have normal camera and carry infrared ones so attacking in night is even better for them