Abu Zolfiqar
Rest in Peace
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2009
- Messages
- 22,555
- Reaction score
- 22
- Country
- Location
Who is this 'they'?
the evil Iranians
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who is this 'they'?
What make you believe the Iranians actually took control and landed it? We have gone through this before and NOT ONE have put forth a credible explanation on how can Iran crack a triple-DES encrypted real time airborne data link.the evil Iranians
What make you believe the Iranians actually took control and landed it? We have gone through this before and NOT ONE have put forth a credible explanation on how can Iran crack a triple-DES encrypted real time airborne data link.
What make you believe the Iranians actually took control and landed it? We have gone through this before and NOT ONE have put forth a credible explanation on how can Iran crack a triple-DES encrypted real time airborne data link.
Well, maybe I should've said 'some Indians' instead. Statistically speaking, since when I've been posting on here, I've seen that around 90% of the Indians on this forum are very pro-US. That's what my experiences on this forum suggest. I have nothing against India or Indians though, they are free to be pro-US and It's none of my business, neither do I care about it; but as my experiences suggest, 9 out of 10 Indians on this forum are overly pro-US. I should reiterate that I didn't say that because I was being anti-Indian, Iran and India have always had good ties, but that's just my opinion.
Yup. Best evidence. Got it? Then show it. In fact, we do not even want it back, we can churn out them out just as fast as Iran can Photochop missiles, just let our engineers, nay, technicians, examine whatever it is. Let the whole thing be under Swiss supervision and let them videotape it for all the world to see.
What if Iran does possess the drone but in pieces because of the crash? How do you explain the video showing a very much intact aircraft?
Ever consider that possibility? Of course not.
Third party confirmation, as in how al-Qaeda pretty much confirmed it. After all, since they cannot see and hear Osama after a while...osama was killed? got evidence? show it.
Which is what and by whom?i have no evidence for or against....just saying that which is being reported to us
And can we say those two fools in that dog-and-pony show video looks like fools? Looky here...Calling people names is not going to get your argument anywhere. We do not even want it back. Just let third parties inspect and do not censor their reports. What is there for Iran to be afraid of?and quite frankly -- if I were at the Pentagon i'd just tell everyone not to make a big deal out of it. Panetta looks like a helpless idiot when he asks the Iranians to politely return the spy plane they were flying clandestinely over their air space.
Then why cover up the underside in that video? Just show us the landing gear's manufacturer tag. Is that too much to ask?Feeding it false gps signals should be considered landing it. And that does not necessarily require cracking any encryption.
Then why cover up the underside in that video? Just show us the landing gear's manufacturer tag. Is that too much to ask?
Third party confirmation, as in how al-Qaeda pretty much confirmed it. After all, since they cannot see and hear Osama after a while...
Then show it. What is the point of covering it up?Maybe cause they missed the altitude by a few meters, and so its belly got damaged?
Nope. The US is saying: Bring it if you got it.Just like your President confirmed the missing drone by asking for it back.