What about them? At least for them, they have what they believe to be good cause. But why does my origin matter to the Pakistanis in this subject? Since they are too cowardly to answer, may be someone can?
How about Iran showing whatever it is that they got?
How about Iran showing whatever it is that they got?
Ooopsss...Is my origin made me out of line for asking that?
The majority of Vietnamese are borned after 1975. They have no emotional ties to the war. They do not hate the US. If anything, they despise their government more than the US.
You really believe that we stopped flying drone recon of and may be even OVER Iran?
If you are a lawyer, then seeing your arguments floating around in this forum, i am a freaking Superman, Batman and Flash Gordon all in one.
Regarding post 35, my challenge still stands to the Pakistani lawyer and law student here. I have the relevant US Senate bill and the UCMJ ready for debate. If they are as good in law education as they claimed, then they should need no wager to prove themselves. But I guess they are too terrified of being schooled by an American, and a naturalized US citizen at that.
The issue is focused just not with his understanding on UCMJ-Article 125 ; It is based on the broader aspect of how he lays out a topic, and how he goes about discussing it in a polemic manner by bringing his biases in the topic. And to be fair, I am surprised that Santro has stood on and watched this farce of a "discussion" without interjecting and deleting them.
Calling it 'discussing' is being far too generous.
This is why I commented on how fascinating it is with the Pakistanis here on my origin. It must be very surprising and unsettling to them that there can be loyal and patriotic non-white Americans. And yet they can call the US a racist country without realizing their own latent racism. I mean...From page 3 post 35 on, what does my origin and bestiality has to do with the Iranian claim of possession of an American drone?
Yes it is anyone job to say someone is using racist comments.
