Iran to return US secret drone...

[gambit]

Put your money where your mouth is.

Doubt is the default response to any claim. Even a first year law student would learned that toot-sweet. So if you are what you claimed to be, it would be YOU who is burdened to put your money where your mouth is. And am expected to believe that you have a law degree?

 

[SQ8]

Are you guys gambling now?

 

[lem34]

Doubt is the default response to any claim. Even a first year law student would learned that toot-sweet. So if you are what you claimed to be, it would be YOU who is burdened to put your money where your mouth is. And am expected to believe that you have a law degree?

So you wont put your money where your mouth is. So keep talking rubbish. Its usual for you to make bul$hit comments and get away with them isn't it? You hide behind the anonymity of the internet. Here if you are a man of your convictions you can do something about it. but no you hide behind blurb. All talk Gambit that's all you are.

 

[gambit]

Are you guys gambling now?

Nope. Am not. But someone else is seriously jeopardizing his credibility.

---------- Post added at 03:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:03 PM ----------

So you wont put your money where your mouth is. So keep talking rubbish. Its usual for you to make bul$hit comments and get away with them isn't it? You hide behind the anonymity of the internet. Here if you are a man of your convictions you can do something about it. but no you hide behind blurb. All talk Gambit that's all you are.

That is where you failed to understand and why I doubt you are smart enough to pass law school. Anonymity forces contestants to focus on the issues, not the personality.

 

[lem34]

Are you guys gambling now?

Santro mate Gambit said something about how a first year law student would agree or support his assertions. I have a LLB (Hons) from a UK Uni. So I stated that I did not agree and I had a LLB. Gambit then questioned it and was sarcastic.

So I stated that as the forum is run on donations both Gambit and I should put a $1000 each up to Webby. I either provide proof to Webby and get my money back and Gambit loses his money or if I cant provide prove it I lose my $1000 to the forum and Gambit gets his money back. Its a macho thing put your money where your mouth is. I don't see it as gambling but being penalised for talking crax. And the forum would win either way.

---------- Post added at 08:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:08 PM ----------

Nope. Am not. But someone else is seriously jeopardizing his credibility.

---------- Post added at 03:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:03 PM ----------


That is where you failed to understand and why I doubt you are smart enough to pass law school. Anonymity forces contestants to focus on the issues, not the personality.

Put up or shut your trap. btw as far as being smart goes I got a very good law degree.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

@Aryan_B which univ bro? im doing it frm London university campus in Pakistan... our books,presentation (on skype),assignments are checked by London univ... im hopin to imigrate to LU next year (second year).

What about doin Bar-at-Law ?

 

[gambit]

Put up or shut your trap. btw as far as being smart goes I got a very good law degree.

You have not done what is naturally burdened upon anyone making a claim, let alone someone in a prestigious and specialized position as that of an attorney making a claim, which is -- DUE DILIGENCE. Either that or you have done a far worse sin for an attorney -- INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY. No matter which way, you brought on this 'bestiality' argument in a feeble attempt to make US looked sexually depraved through legislative means when it was a clear case of legislative incompetence, not intentional.

So which is it:

- Are you an incompetent lawyer?

- Or are you a dishonest one?

Be careful before response. I have the actual US Senate bill and relevant UCMJ article ready.

 

[lem34]

@Aryan_B which univ bro? im doing it frm London university campus in Pakistan... our books,presentation (on skype),assignments are checked by London univ... im hopin to imigrate to LU next year (second year).

What about doin Bar-at-Law ?

Leeds. Got very good contacts in that area. If you want me to assist pm me. One of my best friends is admission tutor. Or give me a call when you come here.

Nope I never practiced. Went into family business

---------- Post added at 08:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:26 PM ----------

You have not done what is naturally burdened upon anyone making a claim, let alone someone in a prestigious and specialized position as that of an attorney making a claim, which is -- DUE DILIGENCE. Either that or you have done a far worse sin for an attorney -- INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY. No matter which way, you brought on this 'bestiality' argument in a feeble attempt to make US looked sexually depraved through legislative means when it was a clear case of legislative incompetence, not intentional.

So which is it:

- Are you an incompetent lawyer?

- Or are you a dishonest one?

Be careful before response. I have the actual US Senate bill and relevant UCMJ article ready.

So you don't want to put $1000 dollar. Your word not even worth that?

 

[gambit]

So you don't want to put $1000 dollar. Your word not even worth that?

Ah...So now we see who is the real coward here -- YOU.

I do not need to wager to prove either:

- You are an incompetent lawyer.

- You are an intellectually dishonest lawyer.

You dug this hole. Keeping on shoveling, buddy.

 

[SQ8]

Anonymity forces contestants to focus on the issues, not the personality.

Agreed.. the whole I am this and that dont mean crap unless backed up by relevant knowledge.

However.. I think this debate is not for this topic..
So lets keep it off .

 

[gambit]

Leeds. Got very good contacts in that area. If you want me to assist pm me. One of my best friends is admission tutor. Or give me a call when you come here.

Nope I never practiced. Went into family business

So this is the best you can do? To show everyone a piece of paper that proved you passed all text books exams? But no records of real law combat experience?

 

[lem34]

Ah...So now we see who is the real coward here -- YOU.

I do not need to wager to prove either:

- You are an incompetent lawyer.

- You are an intellectually dishonest lawyer.

You dug this hole. Keeping on shoveling, buddy.

You make assertions and then you don't have the balls to stand up to what you have stated. Stop twisting and whining. Now we realise that you make things up as you go along like your assertion about a first year law student I asked you to put up or shut up and you whine. Where's the macho Gambit we love gone? lol

---------- Post added at 08:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:34 PM ----------

So this is the best you can do? To show everyone a piece of paper that proved you passed all text books exams? But no records of real law combat experience?

I make more money with what I do. And am happy to do so. I have assisted on occasion but my charges are simply too high for most to be able to afford me

 

[gambit]

Agreed.. the whole I am this and that dont mean crap unless backed up by relevant knowledge.

However.. I think this debate is not for this topic..
So lets keep it off .

Your man is the one who often brings it up. Like I said, I have the relevant US Senate bill and UCMJ article ready. You should let him defend his credibility, or at least the credibility of his Internet handle.

---------- Post added at 03:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:36 PM ----------

You make assertions and then you don't have the balls to stand up to what you have stated. Stop twisting and whining. Now we realise that you make things up as you go along like your assertion about a first year law student I asked you to put up or shut up and you whine. Where's the macho Gambit we love gone? lol

Take your own advice. I have the actual US Senate bill and relevant UCMJ article ready.

 

[lem34]

Agreed.. the whole I am this and that dont mean crap unless backed up by relevant knowledge.

However.. I think this debate is not for this topic..
So lets keep it off .

Its all very well saying that but he started by making a false allegation about me personally ie saying that even a first year student would agree with him. Well he was wrong I did 3 years and I didn't agree with him. I agree we are way off topic and wont go on

 

[gambit]

Its all very well saying that but he started by making a false allegation about me personally ie saying that even a first year student would agree with him. Well he was wrong I did 3 years and I didn't agree with him. I agree we are way off topic and wont go on

Then this make you an intellectually dishonest lawyer. Either way, you lose on substance, which is far worse.