Iran to fire 11,000 missiles at US, Israel if attacked

[Hassan_Ishtiaq]

KSA does not have any missile systems. The only missiles ever they got their hands on were a few Chinese missiles which were sold to them in mid 1980's which Saudis had bought so they could hit Tehran with them. But they are all now expired since and are not usable any more as missiles have an expiry period of between 10 to 15 years. Besides they were the older generation of Chinese missiles which were very inaccurate. Now Saudi regime can not get any missiles ever since the missile ban treaty bans the transfer of technology or missiles of more than 300 kilometers between countries. The only way they can get a missile is if they build it themselves and we all know that Saudi regime does not have any technology whatsoever and is not capable of even making simple stuff let alone complex missile systems.

But what if the Saudis reverse engineer those old Chinese missiles or even replace their aging components and make the functional again?

 

[lem34]

But what if the Saudis reverse engineer those old Chinese missiles or even replace their aging components and make the functional again?

Saudis couldnt reverse engineer their underpants. Back to topic Iran has had 33 years to prepare and I would be surprised if they are not ready to give a tasty surprise to any Zionist inspired attack

 

[longbrained]

But what if the Saudis reverse engineer those old Chinese missiles or even replace their aging components and make the functional again?

As for repair, it is not possible since even the air frame has a life and as it ages it can not endure high g's and will disintegrate if a launch is attempted. And as per missile ban treaty, they can not get any component either so those missiles are all rust by now. There is no chance to repair a bulky and old technology missile such as DF-3A that is over 30 years old now.

As for reverse engineering, that is again impossible since Saudis do not have any technology whatsoever. You have to realize that even reverse engineering a missile is a big technological challenge. It took Pakistan with its highly developed technological sector several decades to master missile technology. Infact all those countries that have a missile with a range of more than 1,000 kilometer developed them after they had got nuclear weapons except for Iran. It goes to say how technologically challenging they are, that is making nuclear weapons is easier than a medium range ballistic missile. It is not for no reason that in English when they want to say some challenging task is not as difficult as it seems, they say: "It is not rocket science". Missiles are complex machines and need precision engineering and very talented engineering teams who invest their entire life times to this field. Saudis can not do it in this century. Maybe in next or the one after.

 

[S.U.R.B.]

sure!
1-imagine that we drop one atomic bomb on zionists and Israel is now history.but next day USA will nuke us with 10 atomic bombs.
2-using atomic bomb is haram.one atomic bomb kills milions of Innocent people(especialy people in jordan,syria,gaza,....).what is their fault?
3- we can destroy israel with out atomic bomb.one Shahab-3b has one ton warhead and his CEP is about 20 metres.
we have 600 shahab-3b.this is enough for them.the only problem is USA and his bases ...
it why we are working on Bavar-373 air defence system...

I'm in total agreement with you statement, but let's keep Atomic bomb out of the equation as Iran is not supposed to use it& also i posted it for an example.And i agree with the fact that Iran should keep on developing/improving the delivery systems and air defence systems.

But the question stays,why a 11,000 or 11,00 missiles for just a 100 targets around you and with in your reach.Doesn't that sends a false signal like we'll try to take your systems out with exhausting your defence systems because we feel that out of 20 ,10 missiles might not hit where we want them to?

Regards.

 

[lem34]

I'm in total agreement with you statement, but let's keep Atomic bomb out of the equation as Iran is not supposed to use it& also i posted it for an example.And i agree with the fact that Iran should keep on developing/improving the delivery systems and air defence systems.

But the question stays,why a 11,000 or 11,00 missiles for just a 100 targets around you and with in your reach.Doesn't that sends a false signal like we'll try to take your systems out with exhausting your defence systems because we feel that out of 20 ,10 missiles might not hit where we want them to?

Regards.

Well it was reported in a paper. maybe the journalist got it wrong or maybe something was lost in translation. However it is not unreasonable that Iran will launch a significant number of missiles if it is attacked.

 

[Arabian Legend]

But what if the Saudis reverse engineer those old Chinese missiles or even replace their aging components and make the functional again?

the saudi have replaced the css2 with the css5 and css6

 

[King Solomon]

As for repair, it is not possible since even the air frame has a life and as it ages it can not endure high g's and will disintegrate if a launch is attempted. And as per missile ban treaty, they can not get any component either so those missiles are all rust by now. There is no chance to repair a bulky and old technology missile such as DF-3A that is over 30 years old now.

As for reverse engineering, that is again impossible since Saudis do not have any technology whatsoever. You have to realize that even reverse engineering a missile is a big technological challenge. It took Pakistan with its highly developed technological sector several decades to master missile technology. Infact all those countries that have a missile with a range of more than 1,000 kilometer developed them after they had got nuclear weapons except for Iran. It goes to say how technologically challenging they are, that is making nuclear weapons is easier than a medium range ballistic missile. It is not for no reason that in English when they want to say some challenging task is not as difficult as it seems, they say: "It is not rocket science". Missiles are complex machines and need precision engineering and very talented engineering teams who invest their entire life times to this field. Saudis can not do it in this century. Maybe in next or the one after.

As reported by DEBKAfile, Saudi Arabia bought some advanced nuclear capable missiles from China recently: DEBKAfile, Political Analysis, Espionage, Terrorism, Security Probably for the nukes which Pakistan reportedly stationed in KSA.

But it is a shame that they still have to buy from China, which implies they have zero self sufficiency and are very vulnerable to sanctions.

 

[longbrained]

As reported by DEBKAfile, Saudi Arabia bought some advanced nuclear capable missiles from China recently: DEBKAfile, Political Analysis, Espionage, Terrorism, Security Probably for the nukes which Pakistan reportedly stationed in KSA.

But it is a shame that they still have to buy from China, which implies they have zero self sufficiency and are very vulnerable to sanctions.

Debka is a Zionist site and is not very reliable at all. Anyways they are talking about the few outmoded, second hand and monkey version of DF-3A that Saudis had bought from China in mid 1980's and which were never even tested. As I have explained in my posts above, they are all dud and expired due to age. As for nukes, that is pure propaganda and speculation promoted on western and Zionist media against Pakistan in order to show that Pakistan is not a responsible state and can not be trusted with nukes. The fact is Pakistan's nukes are safe and in proper command. They are not candies that can be stationed in another country for whatever reason, just like trillion dollar Saudi bank accounts and Saudi oil reserves can not be stationed in Pakistan. KSA has no functioning missiles and certainly no nukes.

the saudi have replaced the css2 with the css5 and css6

Stop with your lies and state propaganda. China has never exported M-9 or DF-21 missiles to any country including Saudi Arabia because both of them violate missile ban treaty.

 

[Killswitch]

If the US and Israel attack Iran, Iran may be able to launch some missiles and cause some havoc for a time.

In the end, the Iranians will have their military capabilities smashed, and any losses incurred by the US and Israel will be replaced easily enough.

Taking on the US and Israel is not a good idea.

I think Iran might be better off giving up its nuke program.

 

[Shapur]

I hope some of those missiles land on the heads of Al Saud family inshallah

Hopefully Iran won't be attacked though.

 

[SyrianChristianPatriot]

the saudi have replaced the css2 with the css5 and css6

The Chinese won't give you CSS5 or CSS6 for many reasons including spreading radicalism version of Islam to their borders like you did so many other countries, being a western puppet.

the saudi have replaced the css2 with the css5 and css6

Most of the weapons Hamas makes is more advanced then anything you have, you probably could not build a CSS5 or CSS6, and china won't sell you one. an old css2 is still way to advanced for saudis. another piece of advice china hasn't given css5 or css6 to anyone.

 

[IranZamin]

In the end, the Iranians will have their military capabilities smashed, and any losses incurred by the US and Israel will be replaced easily enough.

Iranians will show the art of fighting to its enemies

I think Iran might be better off giving up its nuke program.

Give up our right ? it is not the colonial times

 

[Arabian Legend]

The Chinese won't give you CSS5 or CSS6 for many reasons including spreading radicalism version of Islam to their borders like you did so many other countries, being a western puppet.

look who is talking the russian puppet

sources are in the internet find it your way ill low myself down if i share that with you and say hi to Assad cuz soon you will never see him again

 

[SyrianChristianPatriot]

look who is talking the russian puppet

sources are in the internet find it your way ill low myself down if i share that with you and say hi to Assad cuz soon you will never see him again

No not really we have disagreed with russia on many issues but stick to friendship policy with them, you on the other hand are a pure western puppet like a dog to his master.

look who is talking the russian puppet

sources are in the internet find it your way ill low myself down if i share that with you and say hi to Assad cuz soon you will never see him again

I like the way Chinese and Russians handle islamic radicals. Hamas makes more advanced weapons then anything the saudis could produce.

 

[Arabian Legend]

Debka is a Zionist site and is not very reliable at all. Anyways they are talking about the few outmoded, second hand and monkey version of DF-3A that Saudis had bought from China in mid 1980's and which were never even tested. As I have explained in my posts above, they are all dud and expired due to age. As for nukes, that is pure propaganda and speculation promoted on western and Zionist media against Pakistan in order to show that Pakistan is not a responsible state and can not be trusted with nukes. The fact is Pakistan's nukes are safe and in proper command. They are not candies that can be stationed in another country for whatever reason, just like trillion dollar Saudi bank accounts and Saudi oil reserves can not be stationed in Pakistan. KSA has no functioning missiles and certainly no nukes.



Stop with your lies and state propaganda. China has never exported M-9 or DF-21 missiles to any country including Saudi Arabia because both of them violate missile ban treaty.

chaina is the the last country you expect to obey the rules cuz when they smile money the run to it like dogs.