Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just LOL.
You are the greatest Kazakh nomads in the world indeed. I can give you that.
n i thought this thread wud b related to medical science
well atleast now they moved on from horses to civilization.....Nuclear medicine...Arabian horses. Whats the diff?
Potato potAto
Even Andronovo was not our ancient homeland. Kurgan probably was. Anyway. Haplogroups are insignificant. We are classified as Indo-Europeans due to our language, which originated at that place, not because of racial homogeneity.
LOL. So what is your point? Most South Asians speak an Indo-European language but racially less than 10% of them have anything to do with those people that once roamed the Russian and Kazakh Steppe. Just look at them.
Close to all Latin Americans speak an Indo-European language (Spanish) but racially over half of them are native Indians and even a lesser number of them are of "pure" Spanish ancestry.
Can you give me some genetic studies from Iran?
LOL. So what is your point? Most South Asians speak an Indo-European language but racially less than 10% of them have anything to do with those people that once roamed the Russian and Kazakh Steppe. Just look at them.
Close to all Latin Americans speak an Indo-European language (Spanish) but racially over half of them are native Indians and even a lesser number of them are of "pure" Spanish ancestry.
Can you give me some genetic studies from Iran? Let us see how big percentage of Iranians have any ties to the haplogroup R-M420 that is the only haplogroup associated with those people.
Difference is that South Asia already had a massive population and many civilizations before the Indo-Iranians came to inhabit some places. In Iran, only the Elamites were really populating Iran. And they only inhabited a small place in Iran. The rest of the country was largely uninhabited. That is why the Assyrians suddenly spoke about the 'Parsu' (Persians) and 'Madu' (Medians).
In contrast to Latin Americans, our language is natural. We were never colonized in order to speak Indo-European, in contrast to people in South America. So your argument is incorrect here.
I do not have genetic studies from Iran, but Dienekes have them. There is quite some variety in Iran, but we are distinct from other ethnicities in the region. Although we are classified as West Asians. But if you look at older statues of Persians, we pretty much look like our ancient ancestors.
How do you know that most of Iran was not populated less than 3000 years ago?
Lastly I have looked at plenty of genetic studies from all the populations of the Middle East and why is it that we cluster with each other despite not always belonging to the same ethnic group or linguistic family? We, including Iranians, don't cluster with South Asians, South East Asians or Northern Europeans. In fact outside of the Middle East the Middle Eastern populations (overall) seem to cluster most with nearby Southern Europe (Mediterranean areas) and that is only normal seeing that population movements have arrived from the Middle East to those regions for thousands of years. That is how most knowledge was spread including a fundamental thing such as agriculture.
The Elamites which were not Persians or spoke an Indo-Iranian language were very much native to Iran and they are the oldest known civilization in Iran.
So of course people who once lived in Iran were linguistically conquered by probably a small elite that originated on those Steppe lands. This is why only a small part of Iranians actually have any genetic affinity to those people.
Iran just had to crawl to the west for a measly $7b
Yet these Iranis talk like they're some big power in the world making breakthroughs and progressing with inventions.
n i thought this thread wud b related to medical science
are you mean , Reformists !? ....
they are well know for being west's fangirls ...