What's new

'Iran makes hell for Israel if hit'

Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
4,361
Reaction score
0
Amid speculations that the Israeli regime is mulling a military attack against Iran, a member of Iran's Majlis (parliament) warns that Tehran will make 'hell' for Tel Aviv and turn it into a pile of dirt in the first step.


Israeli officials will never commit such an strategic mistake, a member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee of the Majlis Parviz Sorouri told Mehr news agency on Thursday.

We are very keen that Israel creates an opportunity for Iran to make Tel Aviv find the taste of the Islamic Republic's military might and technologies, he added.

The Iranian lawmaker pointed to “hollow” remarks by Israeli officials on a military strike against Iran and stated that they are expressing their dreams within the framework of words.

Sorouri reiterated that Israel does not dare attack Iran and recommended Israeli officials to experience the issue if they have necessary potential.

The legislator noted that Iran will display new defensive and military achievements in the near future.

The United States and Israel have repeatedly threatened Tehran with military strikes on the false pretext that Iran's nuclear program may have a covert military diversion.

Tehran has categorically refuted rhetorical allegations by US-led Western powers, saying that as a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, it has the right to develop and acquire nuclear technology for peaceful purposes.

Iranian officials have vowed to deliver a crushing response to any military strike against the country, warning that any such measure could result in a war that would certainly reach far beyond the Middle East.

SF/MYA/MB

PressTV - 'Iran makes hell for Israel if hit'
 
. .
Israel before attack on iran
ashdod-streets.JPG


Israel after attack on Iran
349.jpg


Be warned!
 
.
Okay guys, what are the qualifications that a country should have to develop nukes?
 
.
Why don't you just get rid of the idiot you call as President and have as many nukes as you wish?

Its not just the president, it is the whole regime.
getting rid of them from Iran, is like getting a bone from a dog ( the dog is the Iranian regime)

---------- Post added at 06:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:38 PM ----------

Okay guys, what are the qualifications that a country should have to develop nukes?

Well they need capable scientist for for which we have..oh i know what you mean.
you MUST be a usa puppet.
 
.
We are very keen that Israel creates an opportunity for Iran to make Tel Aviv find the taste of the Islamic Republic's military might and technologies, he added.

So keen... I hope the keenness does not go overboard and Iran starts throwing missiles here and there without any provocations.

And then they wonder why the world doesn't want them to have nukes.
 
. .
mhP2J.jpg

Israeli EROS B satellite image of Pakistan nuclear facility at Khushab

Israel possesses both civil and military surveillance satellites, giving it assured access to imagery of countries that it considers tobe of interest. A radar imaging satellite called TecSAR, launched in January 2008 via an Indian launch vehicle, gives Israel all-weather, day and night, imagery, although not as detailed as from its Ofeq optical spy satellites - TecSAR resolves objects as small as 1 m in size, whereas Ofeq gets down to 50 cm.25 The most recent in the optical satellite series, Ofeq-9, was launched in June 2010. Israel has already sold its imaging radar technology to India for that country's Risat-2 satellite launched in 2009 and discussions are thought to be underway to build a joint Israel-India TecSAR-2 for launch in 2011.26 The image takenby one ofIsrael's civilian EROS surveillance satellites, is the sort of scene likely to be of interest to both Israel and India.
 
.
They wont throw anything until the Israelite do.

I quoted the statement. Please infer what it precisely means. It is a bright display of a very dangerous attitude prevalent in the Iranian power sections. If someone on PDF comments like this, what does it matter. But such words do not sound very sound coming from those who hold the reins of a big, significant nation as Iran.
 
. .
I dont get what you mean bro.

Well, brother, what I mean is that the people who hold important positions in a country's governing body should be more responsible with their words. The words should never carry the hints of extremism or arrogance.

The statement that I quoted shows that Mr. Perviz Sorouri will be happy to see a war between Israel and Iran, more than anything else.

If someone is "keen", it means that person wants it to "happen", than "not happen".

For the sake of all the common people, and posterity, every country should avoid getting into war, for as long as it is avoidable. And not really be "keen" on getting into wars.

In brief, and simpler but crude words: It is warmongering.
 
. . . . .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom