Experiments[edit]
The experiments were led by
United States Public Health Service physician
John Charles Cutler, who later took part in the late stages of the
Tuskegee syphilis experiment.
[3] In archived documents, Dr.
Thomas Parran, Jr., the
U.S. Surgeon General at the time of the experiments, acknowledged that the Guatemalan work could not be done domestically, and details were hidden from Guatemalan officials.
[4][5]
The experiments were funded by a grant from the
National Institutes of Health to the
Pan American Sanitary Bureau and involved multiple Guatemalan government ministries.
[1] A total of about 1500 study subjects were involved although the findings were never published.
[1]
Information about these experiments was uncovered by Professor
Susan Mokotoff Reverby of
Wellesley College. Reverby found the documents in 2005 while researching the Tuskegee syphilis study, in Cutler's archived papers, and shared her findings with United States government officials.
[1][4]
While the Tuskegee experiment followed the natural progression of syphilis in those already infected, in Guatemala doctors deliberately infected healthy people with the diseases some of which are fatal if untreated. The goal of the study seems to have been to determine the effect of
penicillin in the prevention and treatment of venereal diseases. The researchers paid
prostitutes infected with syphilis to have sex with prisoners and some subjects were infected by directly inoculating them with the bacterium.
[1] When the subjects contracted the disease they were given antibiotics, although adequate penicillin therapy was prescribed for 76% of subjects, completion of therapy was documented for only 26%.[
citation needed]
Francis Collins, the current Director of
National Institutes of Health, called the experiments "a dark chapter in history of medicine" and commented that modern rules prohibit conducting
human subject researchwithout
informed consent.
[6]
The study appears to have ended in 1948, partly because of medical “gossip” about the work, and partly because penicillin was costly and in short supply during
World War 2. Although some follow-up laboratory testing and patient observation continued until the early 1950s.
Additionally, similar research was also conducted on the transmission and
prophylaxis of
gonorrhea and
chancroid.
[7] The subjects for all of the STD experiments consisted of female
sex workers, prisoners, soldiers, and
mental hospitalpatients; the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention acknowledges that "the design and conduct of the studies was unethical in many respects, including deliberate exposure of subjects to known serious health threats, lack of knowledge of and consent for experimental procedures by study subjects, and the use of highly vulnerable populations."
[7]
Apology and response[edit]
In October 2010, the U.S. government formally apologized and announced that there was no statute of limitations for the violation of human rights in that medical research.
[8][9] In a joint statement,
Hillary Clinton and
Kathleen Sebeliussaid:
Although these events occurred more than 64 years ago, we are outraged that such reprehensible research could have occurred under the guise of public health. We deeply regret that it happened, and we apologize to all the individuals who were affected by such abhorrent research practices. The conduct exhibited during the study does not represent the values of the US, or our commitment to human dignity and great respect for the people of Guatemala.
[10]
President
Barack Obama apologized to President
Álvaro Colom, who had called these experiments "a crime against humanity".
[11]
"It is clear from the language of the report that the U.S. researchers understood the profoundly unethical nature of the study. In fact the Guatemalan syphilis study was being carried out just as the “Doctors’ Trial” was unfolding at Nuremberg (December 1946 – August 1947), when 23 German physicians stood trial for participating in Nazi programs to euthanize or medically experiment on concentration camp prisoners."
[12]
The U.S. government asked the
Institute of Medicine to conduct a review of these experiments.
[1] Separately, the
Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues was asked to convene a panel of international experts to review the current state of
medical research on humans around the world and ensure that such incidents cannot be repeated.
[1] The Commission report,
Ethically Impossible: STD Research in Guatemala from 1946 to 1948, published in September 2011, concluded that "the Guatemala experiments involved unconscionable basic violations of ethics, even as judged against the researchers' own recognition of the requirements of the medical ethics of the day."
[13][14]
Human rights activists have called for subjects' families to be compensated
another major slap in the face of the Iranian Mullahs 
