Iran : Israels future at risk if efforts to topple Assad continues

[mohsen]

Old alliances friend. Just like India cant ditch Iran on insistence of USA coz we were together since 7 decades as founders of Non Aligned Movement.

On the other side, India needs Israel for easy and comfortable access to hi tech Ammunitions. Even you understand our challenges are different.

Afterall we have a Kabab mein haddi between our Countries.

then what happened to Gandhi and his famous clothes? expired philosophy?

Middlemen smugglers? How did these middlemen smugglers pay approximately 500 million dollars worth of oil for weapons to Israel?
Yes, Israel and the US did support Iraq. But they also supported Iran.

we didn't pay to Israel. bring proof for your words. it was just some greedy weapon manufacturers and good middlemen. remember how Americans retired the F-14s and closed their manufacturers?

 

[IR1907]

As an Indian, its disheartening to see 2 of ur good friends ISRAEL n IRAN fighting. My friend's enemy is not my enemy. Its always a tough decision for Indians when asked to choose.

Wht does Israel offer you ? really....

 

[WAR-rior]

Wht does Israel offer you ? really....

Well. I wud suggest u do a little study about Indo-Israel relations.

By da way. Iran doesnt have to be insecure or cautious. We will always have ur back. I only hope Iranis understand more bout India's nature of friendship.

Its our philosophy of VASUDEV KUTUMBAKAM. Means we dont have any enemys by default or by ideology. Everyone in da world is our friend until and unless someone poses a threat to us. Simple as that.

Iran can never be a threat to India coz of our Indo-Sassinad cultural history. Also, Shias are more pro to Hindu culture. U can see that among Kashmiris where KASHMIRIAT is more heavy than Islam. Also, all da muslims in BJP, which is a nationalist hindu cultural political party, are all Shias.

On da other side, Israel has completely profit oriented relationship with us. Its more like, Israel needs a buyer and we need a seller without ANY IFS N BUTS. One of the reasons, Israel never compelled India to go against Iran for the sake of its defence business relationship.

 

[punit]

Iran: Messages exchanged with US over militants - WTOP.com

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- A senior Iranian official has confirmed that his country and the U.S. exchanged messages over the fight against the militant Islamic State group.

Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian also was quoted Saturday by Iranian media as saying Iran warned Washington that Israel's security will be at risk should the U.S. and its allies seek to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad in the name of fighting the extremist group.

Iran has backed Assad during Syria's three-year civil war. The U.S. has called for Assad to resign and rules out cooperating with his government in the fight against the Islamic State group.

Abdollahian's comments were the first time a senior Iranian official confirmed that Iran and the U.S. had discussed fighting the Islamic State group.

seriously Iranian. Israel can take care of itself. how about doing something for checking ISIS.

 

[MoshteAhani]

Well. I wud suggest u do a little study about Indo-Israel relations.

By da way. Iran doesnt have to be insecure or cautious. We will always have ur back. I only hope Iranis understand more bout India's nature of friendship.

Its our philosophy of VASUDEV KUTUMBAKAM. Means we dont have any enemys by default or by ideology. Everyone in da world is our friend until and unless someone poses a threat to us. Simple as that.

Iran can never be a threat to India coz of our Indo-Sassinad cultural history. Also, Shias are more pro to Hindu culture. U can see that among Kashmiris where KASHMIRIAT is more heavy than Islam. Also, all da muslims in BJP, which is a nationalist hindu cultural political party, are all Shias.

On da other side, Israel has completely profit oriented relationship with us. Its more like, Israel needs a buyer and we need a seller without ANY IFS N BUTS. One of the reasons, Israel never compelled India to go against Iran for the sake of its defence business relationship.

Mate, Israel is a terror regime.. cooperating with that little terror state is a shame,you Indians are better then that. Atleast USA is a bit better, you should replace terror regime with the USA in trading, businesses etc.

seriously Iranian. Israel can take care of itself. how about doing something for checking ISIS.

ISIS is outside our borders.... thats what it matters. Our policy is to keep the insects away from our soil... we achieve this through aiding neighbouring countries with economic and military aid

 

[PlanetWarrior]

Mate, Israel is a terror regime.. cooperating with that little terror state is a shame,you Indians are better then that. Atleast USA is a bit better, you should replace terror regime with the USA in trading, businesses etc.

The USA has a green friend on our western borders and remains more loyal to them. Our primary ally was and to a large extent remains Russia. The old saying of "the friend of my enemy is my enemy" still applies to the USA. Hence, they treat India India more on a need than a want basis when it comes to supply of advanced weapons. Israel to a large extent cuts off the corners and supplies India without the restrictions which the US applies (such as sanctions against Iran or Russia). Hope that explains the Indo-Israeli relationship to you

 

[Mosamania]

Iran worried about Israel's safety?

It is called desperation, Iran's at the end of its rope, if there is one thing this statement is showing.

 

[F117]

This statement is a veiled threat.

 

[Desertfalcon]

Israel does actually seem to prefer Assad to a potential Muslim Brotherhood government,

So do a great many Americans which has helped cool the anti-Assad zeal of the Obama administration. I am one of those. Much of this has come from the fact that in American politics, Christian political clout counts for much and Assad, for all his faults, is seen as a defender of Syrian Christians who have been targeted by the FSA directly with rape, torture, beheadings, and massacres.

Christians Massacred by ‘Free’ Syrian Army Terrorists (Rebels) | OrthodoxNet.com Blog

 

[Alienoz_TR]

It is called desperation, Iran's at the end of its rope, if there is one thing this statement is showing.

Maybe, but desperation may force someone do the crazy things.

 

[Hiptullha]

then what happened to Gandhi and his famous clothes? expired philosophy?


we didn't pay to Israel. bring proof for your words. it was just some greedy weapon manufacturers and good middlemen. remember how Americans retired the F-14s and closed their manufacturers?

Prove it? Haha, the Israelis and the Americans admit it themselves. Of course, since their "baby killers" they're not a reliable source. I guess I'll have to trust your mullahs engaged on a holy war against the "Great Satan".

 

[mohsen]

Prove it? Haha, the Israelis and the Americans admit it themselves. Of course, since their "baby killers" they're not a reliable source. I guess I'll have to trust your mullahs engaged on a holy war against the "Great Satan".

well, I don't know in which resource they admit those weapon transfers have been a deal between Iranian government and U.S government or Israeli regime, but you can believe whatever side which you are more closer with!

that war was a war between Iran and the whole world, Iraq was just a front-end for them. we captures prisoners from about 17 different countries, true meaning of the world war, but all of them failed and yes we call it holy defense.
you don't need to refer to our mullahs, your brain would be enough if you could use it.
have a look at
Comparison of Iraqi and Iranian military strength before and after that war
whatever we lost in that war by multiple times, Iraqis have been given by multiple times.
ignoring thousands of military equipments which U.S and it's allies given to Saddam and instead talking about a small ( none game changer) weapon deal (which we say has been through smugglers) isn't the way of a fair mind.

 

[raptor22]

It is called desperation, Iran's at the end of its rope, if there is one thing this statement is showing.

No your assumption is wrong ... it means Iran would stand for its allies and back them. We've made it clear from the first day of conflict that we stand by our Syrian brothers.

Prove it? Haha, the Israelis and the Americans admit it themselves. Of course, since their "baby killers" they're not a reliable source. I guess I'll have to trust your mullahs engaged on a holy war against the "Great Satan".

First of all since the revolution we have always said if the so-called great satan changes its policy towards Iran there would be a chance to see reconciliation btw 2 nations ... but israel has been always our red line ...
As I know : Americans wanted to have their hostages in Lebanon freed and they were aware of Iran's influence in Lebanon. On the other hand we were in war and we did need weapons to fight back Iraq .
American flew to Iran with a key-shaped cake and a bible in their hands as sign of peace and a plane full of weapons, the point is Iran had not been aware of the source of those weapons which were israeli .... once we noticed that the the talks were stopped by Iran.

 

[Desertfalcon]

ignoring thousands of military equipments which U.S and it's allies given to Saddam

Contrary to what you may believe, the United States never provided one tank, one piece of artillery, one rifle, not even one bullet, to Saddam Hussein's regime. Ever. It's myth that is frequently repeated by American liberal/leftist that has been repeatedly debunked. Ironically, during the Iran-Iraq War, American only provided weapons to one side....Iran.

Iran–Contra affair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following arms were supplied to Iran:

• August 20, 1985 – 96 TOW anti-tank missiles
• September 14, 1985 – 408 more TOWs
• November 24, 1985 – 18 Hawk anti-aircraft missiles
• February 17, 1986 – 500 TOWs
• February 27, 1986 – 500 TOWs
• May 24, 1986 – 508 TOWs, 240 Hawk spare parts
• August 4, 1986 – More Hawk spares
• October 28, 1986 – 500 TOWs

 

[Hiptullha]

Contrary to what you may believe, the United States never provided one tank, one piece of artillery, one rifle, not even one bullet, to Saddam Hussein's regime. Ever. It's myth that is frequently repeated by American liberal/leftist that has been repeatedly debunked. Ironically, during the Iran-Iraq War, American only provided weapons to one side....Iran.

Iran–Contra affair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following arms were supplied to Iran:

• August 20, 1985 – 96 TOW anti-tank missiles
• September 14, 1985 – 408 more TOWs
• November 24, 1985 – 18 Hawk anti-aircraft missiles
• February 17, 1986 – 500 TOWs
• February 27, 1986 – 500 TOWs
• May 24, 1986 – 508 TOWs, 240 Hawk spare parts
• August 4, 1986 – More Hawk spares
• October 28, 1986 – 500 TOWs

Pretty sure it was done covertly and through arms dealers who had full CIA approval.
Sarkis Soghanalian - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia