1) Indiscriminate bombings of towns and villages is war crime and terrorism.
Except that strikes by Syrian forces weren't "indiscriminate": locations were targeted where intelligence suggested the presence of terrorists.
Something that is reflected in the civilian to combatant kill ratio of the Syrian army, which even according to the figures put forth by anti-government opposition forces is inferior to the Isra"el"i ratio in the numerous wars of aggression launched by Tel Aviv.
Also terrorism is defined differently.
2) Assad aka Khamenai forces indiscriminately bombed Sunni towns and villages for 9 years on daily basis.
Nope, false. Iranian forces bombed almost nothing in Syria. As for Syrian forces, they targeted rebels, therefore no "indiscriminate" action. None of this has anything to do with people's religious backgrounds.
This is a fact, confirmed by sources much more serious than an anonymous zionist user on PDF - namely, the UN, AI, HRW, every renown international lawyer to have commented on the topic etc.
Also, most cities in Syria have religiously mixed populations.
3) Systematic war crimes and murder against ethnic group is genocide.
There was no action against any religious group, let alone an ethnic group. The targets were armed terrorist formations trying to bring about "regime change" through force.
The fact that the quoted user's semantics are fallacious has been amply confirmed by the UN, AI, HRW and every renown international lawyer to have commented on the topic. Who know much better than an anonymous zionist forum user with an apparent agenda to incite sectarianist resentments among Sunni Muslims against Shia Muslims.
4) In addition to these systematic murder and terrorism Assad aka Khamenai forces deliberately targeted hospitals, bakeries, burned down crops.
There was no "systematic" action at all, except against armed terrorists.
Iranian forces never targeted any hospitals, bakeries nor did they burn down any crops. As for the Syrian army, damage it caused to civilian infrastructure was mostly collateral damage ie unintended.
As opposed to the apartheid regime in Tel Aviv, whose Dahya doctrine explicitly calls for the targeting of civilian infrastructures.
4) They used WMD (chemical weapons) dozens times.
There's no conclusive evidence for this. Some of the members of an OPCW panel tasked with verifying the allegations even resigned in protest over the panel's dubious methods.
5) They starved down entire towns.
There's not a single locality whose entire population perished of starvation.
As result of these systematic war crimes and terrorism aka genocide more than 13 million civilians were kicked from their homes, life expectancy in Syria dropped by 20 years, the demographic loss was more than 2 million civilian lives.
Laughable characterization, as confirmed by UN, AI, HRW and international lawyers.
Syrian forces did not "kick" anybody from their homes.
Thats biggest ethnic cleansing and genocide of Muslims in 13 century history hands down. You support and justify all these crime, thus you share responsibility for genocide.
Laughable characterization, as confirmed by UN, AI, HRW and international lawyers.
In modern times alone, there are plenty of conflicts in which many more Muslims were killed, and zionists had a decisive hand in most of these - not to mention the fact that the war in Syria is a consequence of zio-American scheming. Other examples include the illegal embargo on Iraq in the 1990's, imposed by the zionist-controlled US regime, as a result of which nearly 500.000 Muslim babies and children alone lost their lives, including by being deprived of medicine. Or the 1965-1966 mass killings in Indonesia, in which up to 1.2 million people of Muslim background were slaughtered, and which was directly assisted by the Mossad.
Ethnic cleansing is what the zionist regime did to the native Palestinian population during the 1948 Nakba, according to Isra"el"i historians themselves.
And no, the zio-American provoked war in Syria did not lead to the biggest displacement of Muslims in proportional terms. Some 50% of the population were displaced according to opposition sources - which are not necessarily objective, but most of these have found new homes inside their own country, Syria. Those who left the country are said to amount to some 25% of the population.
Whereas in Palestine, no less than 80% of native Muslims, that is close to 700.000 people, were expelled from their homeland during the Nakba, a pre-planned and methodically executed operation of ethnic cleansing.
I take issue with fallacious semantics and faulty logic. One cannot "support" nor "justify" something one correctly identifies as a propagandistic lie. The UN, AI, HRW, and international lawyers are on my side. According to the quoted user's logic, they are all "responsible for genocide". I let readers judge how ridiculous that suggestion is.
The quoted user deliberately spreads falsehoods, therefore shares responsability for the misplaced resentment it generates, which can result in actual violence.
