Let me give you an example of roaming freely, when in Afghanistan the Taliban attack where ever they want while the US troops hide inside their forts, that is roaming freely not hiding in caves in a mountain range.
Are you serious? can you please read what you wrote, how wouldn't it matter if Iran had near impeccable border security? Sounds like what you are saying is that there are people that want to hurt me but i shouldn't do anything about it and just cry when something goes wrong.
Didn't you write in your first post that no Iranian threatened Pakistan?
Anyway if Iran is justified in attacking Pakistan then Pakistan would equally be justified to attack Iran for harbouring do you agree?Indian RAW agent kulbhushan jadhav and trying to protect terrorist Ozair Baloch,
Attack terrorists in Pakistan equates to threatening Pakistan? Iran going after terrorists organizations doesn't threaten Pakistan proper. Iran would be willing to sacrifice life and limb to get rid of an issue (or at least tackle an issue) that Pakistan can't seem to get a good handle on. I'm not writing these posts to put Pakistan down, I would like nothing more than to see these groups be eradicated but with the current paradigm another attack on Iranian troops will be most likely happen and the fault is not 100% on the Iranians if it does happen. I believe not too long after the attack on Iranian troops there was attack on Pakistani troops or civilians, so we can at least agree there is a mutual problem between Pakistan and Iran.
Look, I get it I really do get it Pakistan is in a tough situation with nukes that has to face India which has an overwhelming military and threatens Pakistan with war but the terrorist issue in the Baluchistan region must be addressed. We Americans had to go after Bin Laden which was in Pakistan and the ISI couldn't even find him, idk what came of it as far as relations between Pakistan and US goes but we had to do what was necessary to kill him. Iran has some degree of agency to exact revenge or simply quell a mutual problem between Iran and Pakistan.
"Anyway if Iran is justified in attacking Pakistan then Pakistan would equally be justified to attack Iran for harbouring do you agree?Indian RAW agent kulbhushan jadhav and trying to protect terrorist Ozair Baloch"
If it was an entire terrorist group I would be more inclined to agree that Pakistan would be justified in attacking but you are referencing ONE or two agents which is just different from entire terrorists organizations operating from Pakistan soil attacking Iranian troops. There just really isn't any comparison between those two. I mean I guess that's fair all things considered...
"Are you serious? can you please read what you wrote, how wouldn't it matter if Iran had near impeccable border security? Sounds like what you are saying is that there are people that want to hurt me but i shouldn't do anything about it and just cry when something goes wrong."
The terrorists are still coming from PAKISTAN, meaning they will come at the border posts and troops on the border or towns irregardless of the level in border security (also that region is just an expansive volatile region, 100% security is realistically impossible). The groups need to be dealt with directly is more or less the point I'm trying to get at.
It is our view that the US is the epicenter of extremism and terrorism. The NZ shooter was educated in your backyard. Fix your own issues first.
Pakistan and Iran will handle this ourselves.
I sincerely hope so, these terrorists need to be dealt with for both Iran and Pakistans sake. Also lol, you're talking to someone who isn't a, fan much less supporter of US foreign policy. American gallivanting the world over especially in the Middle East has caused an entire gambit of issues many of which I'm ashamed of.