Iran directly enters to the warr against Israel's genocide

This statement reflects a strong and uncompromising stance by the Islamic Republic of Iran against perceived aggressions, particularly referring to "Zionist terrorists," which typically points to Israel in the language used by Iranian officials. Such rhetoric underscores the heightened tensions between Iran and Israel, which have long been adversaries in the Middle East.

If this escalates into a conflict, it could have significant implications for regional stability, potentially drawing in multiple actors from across the region and beyond. The statement highlights Iran's willingness to retaliate forcefully, reinforcing its position as a central figure in the broader geopolitical struggles in the Middle East, particularly in relation to Israel and its allies.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1841742936859361726

 

[HamzaWaseem]

WASHINGTON: US President Joe Biden on Friday advised Israel against striking Iran’s oil facilities, saying he was trying to rally the world to avoid the escalating prospect of all-out war in the Middle East.

But his predecessor Donald Trump, currently campaigning for another term in power, went so far as to suggest Israel should “hit” the Islamic republic’s nuclear sites.

Making a surprise first appearance in the White House briefing room, Biden said that Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu “should remember” US support for Israel when deciding on next steps.

“If I were in their shoes, I’d be thinking about other alternatives than striking oil fields,” Biden told reporters when asked about his comments a day earlier that Washington was discussing the possibility of such strikes with its ally.

Biden added that the Israelis “have not concluded how they’re, what they’re going to do” in retaliation for a huge ballistic missile attack by Iran on Israel on Tuesday.

The price of oil had jumped after Biden’s remarks Thursday.

Any long-term rise could be damaging for US Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democrat confronts Republican Trump in a November 5 election where the cost of living is a major issue.

The Israeli Defence Minister has issued a stark warning, suggesting that Iran may face a fate similar to that of Gaza or Beirut. This statement reflects ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran, highlighting concerns about Iran's military capabilities and regional influence. The comparison to Gaza and Beirut, both of which have experienced significant conflict and destruction, underscores the potential consequences of escalating hostilities in the region. Such rhetoric often serves to reinforce Israel's stance on security and the need to counter perceived threats from Iran and its allies.

Source:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1842997889817280936

 

[HaiderAfan]

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has issued a strong warning regarding its missile capabilities in response to potential Israeli aggression. The IRGC stated that if Israel makes the mistake of attacking Iran, it is prepared to deliver a far more severe response than in the past. This assertion reflects Iran's ongoing commitment to enhancing its military capabilities, particularly its ballistic missile program.
Key Points

Missile Development: Iran has significantly advanced its missile technology in recent years, focusing on precision and range. The IRGC highlighted that their missile arsenal is capable of responding effectively to any aggression from Israel, indicating a readiness to utilize these capabilities if necessary

Recent Expansions: Satellite imagery has revealed that Iran is expanding its missile production facilities, aiming to boost both the quantity and quality of its missile systems. This expansion is part of Iran's broader strategy to enhance its military deterrence against regional adversaries, including Israel4

Strategic Deterrence: The IRGC's statements emphasize that Iran views its missile program as a critical component of its national defense strategy. The missiles are designed not only for conventional warfare but also have the capability to carry nuclear payloads, raising concerns among international observers about the potential for escalation in the region

Regional Tensions: The rhetoric from Iranian officials comes amidst heightened tensions between Iran and Israel, particularly following recent conflicts involving Iranian-backed groups in the region. The IRGC's warning serves as a reminder of the precarious security situation and the potential for rapid escalation if provocations occur

In summary,
Iran's readiness to respond decisively to any Israeli attack underscores the ongoing volatility in Middle Eastern geopolitics, with missile capabilities playing a central role in both deterrence and potential conflict scenarios

https://twitter.com/x/status/1842955475102695551

There are unconfirmed reports that Iran may have conducted a nuclear test, causing an earthquake with a magnitude of 4.6 on the Richter scale. Western intelligence agencies are currently investigating whether the tremor was a natural event or the result of an underground nuclear explosion.

If confirmed, this development would mark a significant escalation in Iran's nuclear program, with potentially serious geopolitical implications. The international community, particularly Western powers, would likely respond with concern, as such a test could indicate a major step forward in Iran's nuclear capabilities. Verification of the cause of the earthquake will be crucial in shaping diplomatic responses and future strategies regarding Iran's nuclear ambitions.

View attachment 1032931 View attachment 1032932

May be
There is a strong possibility that Iran will very soon announce itself as a nuclear power.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

The Israeli Defence Minister has issued a stark warning, suggesting that Iran may face a fate similar to that of Gaza or Beirut. This statement reflects ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran, highlighting concerns about Iran's military capabilities and regional influence. The comparison to Gaza and Beirut, both of which have experienced significant conflict and destruction, underscores the potential consequences of escalating hostilities in the region. Such rhetoric often serves to reinforce Israel's stance on security and the need to counter perceived threats from Iran and its allies.

Source:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1842997889817280936

By threatening Iran, Israel is giving itself room to act in a relentless genocidal manner in Lebanon as it does in Gaza and West Bank. Direct Israeli attack on Iran was weak and so was Iran's direct attack. Difference is they have eliminated top Iranian and Resistance personnel. Only US can do the kind of damage to Iran that Israel does to Lebanon and Gaza.

 

[vizier]

There are unconfirmed reports that Iran may have conducted a nuclear test, causing an earthquake with a magnitude of 4.6 on the Richter scale. Western intelligence agencies are currently investigating whether the tremor was a natural event or the result of an underground nuclear explosion.

If confirmed, this development would mark a significant escalation in Iran's nuclear program, with potentially serious geopolitical implications. The international community, particularly Western powers, would likely respond with concern, as such a test could indicate a major step forward in Iran's nuclear capabilities. Verification of the cause of the earthquake will be crucial in shaping diplomatic responses and future strategies regarding Iran's nuclear ambitions.

View attachment 1032931 View attachment 1032932

There should be rational precautions against israeli or similar countries nuclear attacks. Waiting from outside to happen wont solve the problems. Imaan + Thinking will bring solutions to the problems. There seems to be lack of thinking from Iran's side as firstly Hezb commanders were targeted in Beirut then later on Nasrallah was martyred and then again in Beirut successor of Hezbollah was attacked possibly with Quds force commander. It is evident that all hideouts and bunkers are discovered in Beirut but it is the third consecutive mistake. Thinking thinking thinking. Iranian officials, think tank groups have the brains-hardware just like we do. If they have the antenna they can think just like we do and find solutions that are out there and they should think 1000x more than us forum members here. It is their responsibility first and foremost not ours.

Having said that nuclear deterrance can have several forms in my opinion. Iran would have 2-3 nukes at most if they acquired the capability newly. they should separate the nuclear tipped missiles to different areas and protect them not putting all eggs in one basket. In a nuclear retaliation attack scenario they should be used with other maneuvering conventional ballistic missiles to reduce the risk of being taken down by israeli abms. Other than that I think there are several semi-nuclear options which are previous protective detterance stages before being fully nuclear equipped.

Radioactive warheads like Cobalt 60(dust particles) is one of such solutions that can pe produced in numbers like 20+ of them would have credible deterrence against israel having sufficient radioactive fallout deterring an israeli nuclear attack(they should explode before hitting the ground at sufficient altitude to separate the cobalt 60 radioactive particles to a larger area). I hope that already Iran have thought out such measures. Another option is having uranium bullets inside ballistic missile warheads(1000s of mini uranium bullets in single warhead). It can be claimed to be depleted uranium but ofcourse it shouldnt be depleted uranium to have radioactive effect. Small uranium bullets inside warheads will turn to dust when collides with objects on the ground and when inhaled it will have the destructive effect(the warhead should explode at sufficient altitude above ground for maximum separation). It is claimed that israel is already using depleted uranium shells in Beirut. Iran can produce and claim their own "depleted" uranium ballistic missile warheads against israeli bunkers in return but actually these missiles would not be bunker busters to have radiation effect as explained. They should have mini uranium bullets exploding high above the ground.

Having 20+ cobalt 60 radioactive warheads and 50+ uranium mini bullet equipped warheads would be a stop gap measure immediately, before obtaining enough number of nuclear warheads like 20+ which can take several years.

By the way I highly suspect as israel is cornered from many sides they will try to make Russia use nukes in Ukraine. That they will try by allowing Ukr to use cruise missiles like lrasm, s.shadow and similar inside Russia at the end of October before elections. In that scenario defensive items(anti drone, anti cruise missile air defence systems) should be supplied to Russia by Iran and possibly China. These are defensive items that dont hurt Ukraine in any way. In return Russia will limit strikes to Kyiv Lviv and other areas as long as the Iran-Chinese missile shield protects Russia. If shield is breached Russia is free to make a conventional proportional retaliation strike on Kyiv Lviv and similar areas west of Dniepr. Then after retaliation Russia wont strike as the shield protects them until it is breached again. If Urkaine attacks Crimea and other areas in SMO zone Odessa is free to be targeted conventionally by Russia in return. Some areas like Ukraine airbases can be excluded from the untargetable-list which are active in the conflict. This can also dampen the conflict giving way to a possible ceasefire. After ceasefire both sides can negotiate how long they want to come to a solution of terriotrial and economical problems for both sides. Also in less threat areas for Russia like in eastern Ukr using fab bombs which are unstoppable by Ukr on supply roads instead of directly on soldiers will make the soldiers in trenches surrender instead of taking them out this strategy will pay well for Russia much better and in longer term.

 

[HaiderAfan]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1842965397823496580

 

[AbdulQadir7]

Update: Mobile ballistic missile launchers are being moved around inside Iran – the missile defense forces are at 100% readiness in all regions.
Iran announced that it would respond to Israel immediately if Israel made the mistake of attacking them!

 

[AbdulQadir7]

There should be rational precautions against israeli or similar countries nuclear attacks. Waiting from outside to happen wont solve the problems. Imaan + Thinking will bring solutions to the problems. There seems to be lack of thinking from Iran's side as firstly Hezb commanders were targeted in Beirut then later on Nasrallah was martyred and then again in Beirut successor of Hezbollah was attacked possibly with Quds force commander. It is evident that all hideouts and bunkers are discovered in Beirut but it is the third consecutive mistake. Thinking thinking thinking. Iranian officials, think tank groups have the brains-hardware just like we do. If they have the antenna they can think just like we do and find solutions that are out there and they should think 1000x more than us forum members here. It is their responsibility first and foremost not ours.

Having said that nuclear deterrance can have several forms in my opinion. Iran would have 2-3 nukes at most if they acquired the capability newly. they should separate the nuclear tipped missiles to different areas and protect them not putting all eggs in one basket. In a nuclear retaliation attack scenario they should be used with other maneuvering conventional ballistic missiles to reduce the risk of being taken down by israeli abms. Other than that I think there are several semi-nuclear options which are previous protective detterance stages before being fully nuclear equipped.

Radioactive warheads like Cobalt 60(dust particles) is one of such solutions that can pe produced in numbers like 20+ of them would have credible deterrence against israel having sufficient radioactive fallout deterring an israeli nuclear attack(they should explode before hitting the ground at sufficient altitude to separate the cobalt 60 radioactive particles to a larger area). I hope that already Iran have thought out such measures. Another option is having uranium bullets inside ballistic missile warheads(1000s of mini uranium bullets in single warhead). It can be claimed to be depleted uranium but ofcourse it shouldnt be depleted uranium to have radioactive effect. Small uranium bullets inside warheads will turn to dust when collides with objects on the ground and when inhaled it will have the destructive effect(the warhead should explode at sufficient altitude above ground for maximum separation). It is claimed that israel is already using depleted uranium shells in Beirut. Iran can produce and claim their own "depleted" uranium ballistic missile warheads against israeli bunkers in return but actually these missiles would not be bunker busters to have radiation effect as explained. They should have mini uranium bullets exploding high above the ground.

Having 20+ cobalt 60 radioactive warheads and 50+ uranium mini bullet equipped warheads would be a stop gap measure immediately, before obtaining enough number of nuclear warheads like 20+ which can take several years.

By the way I highly suspect as israel is cornered from many sides they will try to make Russia use nukes in Ukraine. That they will try by allowing Ukr to use cruise missiles like lrasm, s.shadow and similar inside Russia at the end of October before elections. In that scenario defensive items(anti drone, anti cruise missile air defence systems) should be supplied to Russia by Iran and possibly China. These are defensive items that dont hurt Ukraine in any way. In return Russia will limit strikes to Kyiv Lviv and other areas as long as the Iran-Chinese missile shield protects Russia. If shield is breached Russia is free to make a conventional proportional retaliation strike on Kyiv Lviv and similar areas west of Dniepr. Then after retaliation Russia wont strike as the shield protects them until it is breached again. If Urkaine attacks Crimea and other areas in SMO zone Odessa is free to be targeted conventionally by Russia in return. Some areas like Ukraine airbases can be excluded from the untargetable-list which are active in the conflict. This can also dampen the conflict giving way to a possible ceasefire. After ceasefire both sides can negotiate how long they want to come to a solution of terriotrial and economical problems for both sides. Also in less threat areas for Russia like in eastern Ukr using fab bombs which are unstoppable by Ukr on supply roads instead of directly on soldiers will make the soldiers in trenches surrender instead of taking them out this strategy will pay well for Russia much better and in longer term.

Iran prepares for warr......
…
Iran's Ministry of Defense asks citizens not to take pictures
or videos of Iranian military equipment moving on roads

 

[AbdulQadir7]

BREAKING: Armenian Seismic Station Detects Possible Explosion in IranAn Armenian station detected a 4.6 magnitude seismic event in Iran last night. Researchers noted that it lacked a seismic compressional wave, making the event more consistent with an explosion rather than an earthquake.The seismic activity was centered in the Kavir desert near the town of Aradan, and comparisons between typical earthquake vibrations and nuclear tests suggest this event more closely resembles a nuclear test. Notably, no aftershocks were recorded, which is another clue pointing to an explosion rather than natural seismic activity.