What's new

Iran confirms sending troops to Syria

Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought it was Egypt. Can you give me a source???
I read it somewhere. I don't know what criteria they used. All I know is that the modern state of IRan achieved unification in 600 BCE. Egypt obviously has cultures dating back to 3000 BCE, but the IRanian plateu was also full of civilization at that time. I think the main criteria is that the same ethnic nationilities and language must still be present in the same borders.
 
. .
And Israeli-Iran alliance would send the arabs off their rocker this will put the situation in a very interesting position.
Its going to happen very soon, after this regime is ousted Iran will be very secular, more than attatork was. Iranian/zionist alliance is bound to happen, naturally. That's why US hasn't bombed them yet, trying to use all possible chances for regime change. That's fine with us, we defeated the Roman and Persian empires simultaneously, we can do it again.
 
.
Not the saudis would be paranoid in this situation rushing for further unity, Israeli-Iran Alliance would ensure Irans dominance, Persian Gulf Remains Persian not Arabian Golf, Bahrain would be under Irans sphere of influence, Iraq would be fully an Iranian puppet, same with lebanon.

Yea but Arabs would be easiest to take over. If Americans refused to help them. Pakistanis refuse to get involved what could they do not much.
 
.
Conclusion of this thread:Arabs are killing arabs in Syria, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain, Iraq etc... and the fighters, killers, suicide bombers, ideology, secterianism, tribalism and culture are all products of arabs.

As a result, foreigners can divide them, rule them and make them do their bidding.

Without further adue, I would request that arabs stop being such secterian individuals and stop killing and massacring each other over religion and ethnicity. Life is too short for blowing yourself up in a shia mosque. There is more to life than that.
 
.
Its going to happen very soon, after this regime is ousted Iran will be very secular, more than attatork was. Iranian/zionist alliance is bound to happen, naturally. That's why US hasn't bombed them yet, trying to use all possible chances for regime change. That's fine with us, we defeated the Roman and Persian empires simultaneously, we can do it again.

Yea but last 50 years Israel being slapping you silly. You do not know whether you are coming or going
 
.
Its going to happen very soon, after this regime is ousted Iran will be very secular, more than attatork was. Iranian/zionist alliance is bound to happen, naturally. That's why US hasn't bombed them yet, trying to use all possible chances for regime change. That's fine with us, we defeated the Roman and Persian empires simultaneously, we can do it again.

of course but past victories don't equal to much you failed in the combined war against iran and the wars against israel, you guys haven't won a single conflict against Iran or Israel to this date.
 
.
Conclusion of this thread:Arabs are killing arabs in Syria, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain, Iraq etc... and the fighters, killers, suicide bombers, ideology, secterianism, tribalism and culture are all products of arabs.

As a result, foreigners can divide them, rule them and make them do their bidding.

Without further adue, I would request that arabs stop being such secterian individuals and stop killing and massacring each other over religion and ethnicity. Life is too short for blowing yourself up in a shia mosque. There is more to life than that.


Excellent synopsis
 
.
So now the thread's not getting derailed??? Its derailed when you have to answer an uncomfortably question????
Yes so what do your leaders wear????
Mr Zaradari????? Musharraf?????

you embarrass only yourself and Indians.
 
.
of course but past victories don't equal to much you failed in the combined war against iran and the wars against israel, you guys haven't won a single conflict against Iran or Israel to this date.

I think they were successful against Bahrains civilians
 
.
Yea but Arabs would be easiest to take over. If Americans refused to help them. Pakistanis refuse to get involved what could they do not much.


This is getting boring:shout:, man, there is sth a normal human being has, called "brain" which is used for thinking before doing anything. It seems you do everything and then think about them. Aran-B, this is called BS my friend. your just pissed off and trying to come up with imaginary scenarios to get back on Arabs. We get it, let's now get down to earth.
 
.
Yea but Arabs would be easiest to take over. If Americans refused to help them. Pakistanis refuse to get involved what could they do not much.

Pakistan can't do much It would be better if you guys increased ties with Iran controlled afghanistan,deepened the relationship with China, No need to get involved in arab affairs Indonesia has 1 trillion $ + economy do you seem them trying to be the superpower of the muslim world ?
 
.
This is getting boring:shout:, man, there sth a normal human being has called "brain" which used for thinking before doing anything. It seems you do everything and then think about them. Aran-B, this is called BS my friend. your just pissed off and trying to come up with imaginary scenarios to get back on Arabs. We get it, let's now get down to earth.

I have no problem with Arabs per se. Just your leaders who bow to America and Israel
 
. .
Pakistan can't do much It would be better if you guys increased ties with Iran controlled afghanistan,deepened the relationship with China, No need to get involved in arab affairs Indonesia has 1 trillion $ + economy do you seem them trying to be the superpower of the muslim world ?

I have no delusions about super power status. However I have been advocating closer relations with Iran China and Russia for the betterment of all our people etc
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom