What's new

Iran and India have similar views on Afghanistan

Didn't expect such false history from you bro :no:

Persian empires and civilisations have had relationships and influence with Indian civilisations and empires that spanned across large parts of the sub-continent, way beyond just the Pakistani part of India.



An Indian member Sarthak on the other thread had said stuff about Iran which made Kollang talk crap about India. Open your eyes and try and be a bit more objective, otherwise you just end up giving other Indians a bad name .

If you can't contribute constructively then don't go around BSing as well please.

So he has right to say bad things to India?? You can shut up but I will not. For me self respect of India is more important rather than what other country member will say about India. Indians are known for clear and distinct speech rather than pleasing someone else. If any one has bad mouth he is needed to be given reply in same manner and in the same way.
 
What are you crazy? We are not Wahabbis and we don't run our foreign policy on religion.
Lolz. The Hindus would later want the Iranians to become Hindu, just like they openly want us to become Hindu.
 
Iran supported Pakistan in 1965 and 1971 wars with India with Spare Parts, Oil and Money.

When Iran was alone fighting Iraq who was being bankrolled by Arabs, Iran asked Pakistan for spare parts for its Radars, Fighters, and other weaponry. And we were going to give it to Iran until Arabs pressured us not to do so.

That is betrayal.

The Baathist in the Arab World had always been pro-India. During 1956, in the Suez Canal Crisis, Nasser himself said that the Suez Canal belongs to Egypt as much as Kashmir belongs to India.

And weren't you going to provide me links on how Pakistani hospitals were treating wounded Iranian soldiers? :D


We got an open invite from Saddam to attack Iran. We did not attack Iran. Saddam was pro-India so all of our help was disclosed.

After our rejection, Saddam started arming Baluch separatists to attack Iran, which fueled violence in our country. In response Iran even sent Chinook helicopters to take care of the separatists.

I don't have the sources off-hand, but I am pretty sure Niaz or another senior TT could elaborate.
 
Ahhh....no ! We have had enough democracy brought by the land of the brave & the home of the free in our region ! Any attack on Iran by the US would destabilize the region; any attack by Israel would make the Muslim World forget the Shia...Sunni BS & support Iran wholeheartedly...yes even Saudi Arabia.

Sunni-Shia rivalry has been going on for 1,400 years.

Its not going to end with Israel attacking Iran.
 
Retired or not , how does that make a difference?

The fact is that your government kept repeatedly sending its trained troops to put down people's protests in Bahrain.

Quoted for amusement..

Thanks for your input, before thread was going excessively serious.
 
Didn't expect such false history from you bro :no:

Persian empires and civilisations have had relationships and influence with Indian civilisations and empires that spanned across large parts of the sub-continent, way beyond just the Pakistani part of India.

Nope...no false history here ! Just trying to understand the dichotomy of things : When we point out that the Arab, Persian & Afghan Invaders attacked India...one of you would make a point to highlight that it was the areas that became Pakistan. On the other hand when we say the Urdu is heavily Persian influenced by Persian & that we have many cultural & perhaps even genetic similarities with the Persians & that we feel a sense of affinity or bond with them; where as Hindi took the Sanskrit root & India makes a point of disassociating itself from the 'Invasions' & its foot print, we're labeled with Stockholm's Syndrome !
 
Sunni-Shia rivalry has been going on for 1,400 years.

Its not going to end with Israel attacking Iran.

Never said that ! Only implied that if its Israel the whole of the Muslim world will get relied over it.
 
Nope...no false history here ! Just trying to understand the dichotomy of things : When we point out that the Arab, Persian & Afghan Invaders attacked India...one of you would make a point to highlight that it was the areas that became Pakistan. On the other hand when we say the Urdu is heavily Persian influenced by Persian & that we have many cultural & perhaps even genetic similarities with the Persians & that we feel a sense of affinity or bond with them; where as Hindi took the Sanskrit root & India makes a point of disassociating itself from the 'Invasions' & its foot print, we're labeled with Stockholm's Syndrome !

The invaders did invade Pakistani territory first before advancing into modern Indian territory, that is a fact. Indian only bring this up when Pakistanis try to insult Indians by taking the names of those Afghan, Uzbek invaders .
 
Nope...no false history here ! Just trying to understand the dichotomy of things : When we point out that the Arab, Persian & Afghan Invaders attacked India...one of you would make a point to highlight that it was the areas that became Pakistan. On the other hand when we say the Urdu is heavily Persian influenced by Persian & that we have many cultural & perhaps even genetic similarities with the Persians & that we feel a sense of affinity or bond with them; where as Hindi took the Sanskrit root & India makes a point of disassociating itself from the 'Invasions' & its foot print, we're labeled with Stockholm's Syndrome !

Post of the thread, kudos!
 
We got an open invite from Saddam to attack Iran. We did not attack Iran. Saddam was pro-India so all of our help was disclosed.

After our rejection, Saddam started arming Baluch separatists to attack Iran, which fueled violence in our country. In response Iran even sent Chinook helicopters to take care of the separatists.

I don't have the sources off-hand, but I am pretty sure Niaz or another senior TT could.

You are confusing your timelines which is not surprising.

The Baloch uprisings occurred in the 1970's after what happened in East Pakistan. Both Pakistan and Iran coordinated and crushed those uprisings.

There were no Baloch uprisings in the 1980's.

Saddam tried to get Arabs and Sunnis living in Iran to rise up against Iran and it failed, totally.

We betrayed Iran because we did not help Iran during its war with Iraq just as Iran had helped us in our wars with India all because of Arab pressure.
 
Back
Top Bottom