What's new

IRAF chief visit to PAF

Are we going to buy stuff from Pakistan?

He is visiting a fighter jet as it seems

Wouldn't be surprised if that was on the table, but I'm sceptical as to whether or not Pakistan would or even should sell.

I thought Dawn is anti Iran with its provocative and false reports about shelling Pak civilians by Iran. Dawn is BS-er of our century. I thought that is being funded either by Saudi or Israel.

It's being put to good use (coaster for a drink lol).
 
if only they could find a suitable, multirole, inexpensive, modern with a capability of different weapons integration and sanction proof jet...cough cough JF cough JF17 cough...
Absolutely I believe Jf17 would give them what they looking for with reasonable price when they have to replace all of theior jets. Jf 17 is what they after.
 
1.
ShowPicture.aspx


2.
ShowPicture.aspx
ShowPicture.aspx


3.
ShowPicture.aspx


4.
ShowPicture.aspx


5.
ShowPicture.aspx


6.
ShowPicture.aspx


7.
ShowPicture.aspx


8.
ShowPicture.aspx

What’s inside c-130 some kind of station isr? Ew? Sar?

Iran is I tune the largest Mashaq user ?? Are they getting upgrades ?? Color a scheme
 
Trump finalises team to deal with Iran and North Korea , the count down starts:-

John Bolton: Bush-era war hawk makes comeback

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37989338

_92459421_hi003156101.jpg
Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
President Donald Trump has appointed John Bolton, the former US envoy to the UN, as his national security adviser, politically reanimating a strident Bush administration neo-conservative.

The decision comes as a surprise, not least because Mr Trump was reported to have decided against naming Mr Bolton secretary of state last year as he disliked his walrus moustache.

Mr Bolton's new role will prove controversial since he remains an unapologetic cheerleader of the 2003 Iraq war, which the US president himself once lambasted as "a big mistake".

Known for that bushy facial hair, curmudgeonly manner and tousled appearance, Mr Bolton is praised by conservative admirers as a straight-talking foreign policy hawk.

But the Republican was also once memorably branded by a cable television host as "a massive neocon on steroids".

Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul described Mr Bolton last year in an op-ed as "hell-bent on repeating virtually every foreign policy mistake the US has made in the last 15 years".

A Baltimore fireman's son, Mr Bolton has been a staunch conservative from his boyhood.

_100533914_gettyimages-72716627.jpg
Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionMr Bolton with President Bush in the Oval Office in December 2006
At the age of 15 he took time off school to campaign for Barry Goldwater in the 1964 presidential campaign.

At Yale University, where he studied law, he recalled in his memoir feeling like a "space alien" among the campus anti-Vietnam war activists.

Bill and Hillary Clinton were among his classmates, but he said he "didn't run in their circles".

Mr Bolton went on to serve in the administrations of Ronald Reagan, George HW Bush and George W Bush.

He ruffled feathers in the second Bush administration where he initially worked as US Department of State under-secretary for arms control.

Mr Bolton was accused of trying to force out two intelligence analysts who disagreed with him and of seeking to undermine his boss, Colin Powell.

He also helped build the case that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction, which turned out to be wrong.

_92459495_hi017281355.jpg

Image captionA 2003 satellite image, which the US State Department claimed showed an Iraqi chemical ammunition depot
But Mr Bolton was praised for his work establishing the Proliferation Security Initiative, an international agreement to prohibit fissile material shipments.

Nevertheless, President Bush dismayed diplomats when he named Mr Bolton as US ambassador to the United Nations.

More than 100 former US envoys signed a letter urging senators to reject the nomination.

This was, after all, the man who had once said there was "no such thing" as the UN and called the US the world's "only real power".

Mr Bolton had also previously declared that if the 38-storey UN building "lost 10 storeys today, it wouldn't make a bit of difference".

President Bush had to use a recess appointment to crowbar Mr Bolton into the job in 2005 after Senate Democrats, and even a few Republicans, blocked the move.

Democrats ultimately refused to confirm Mr Bolton and he had to step down when his appointment expired in January 2007.

Diplomats at the UN privately criticised his style as abrasive.

Even the state department was not spared the ire of Mr Bolton, who is known for his scorn of dovish multilateral institutions.

He once derided careerists at the US foreign ministry as having been "schooled in accommodation and compromise with foreigners, rather than aggressive advocacy of US interests".

Mr Bolton, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, does not appear to have modified his views since his last spell in government.

As he briefly weighed his own run for the US presidency in 2016, he maintained the American-led invasion of Iraq had been "correct".

He also called in a New York Times op-ed for Iran to be bombed, and pilloried President Obama's nuclear deal with the Islamic Republic as a "diplomatic Waterloo".

In his memoir, Surrender is Not an Option, Mr Bolton railed against the "deadening Brussels bureaucracies" of the European Union.

And in a recent op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, he set out the case for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea.

His new role at the commander-in-chief's ear may perplex those who voted for Mr Trump because of his vow to avoid US military adventures overseas.



Share this story About sharing
 
we understand that dawn is a Anti Pakistan type of news paper, so why chosen to be on the table. just an observation.
ShowPicture.aspx


Dawn is not anti-Pakistani, but a national and progressive Pakistani newspaper, nothing wrong, critical means not anti, but a different mind, which leads to new thinking and ways, the key and ground for a modern and progressive future.
 
Dawn is not anti-Pakistani, but a national and progressive Pakistani newspaper, nothing wrong, critical means not anti, but a different mind, which leads to new thinking and ways, the key and ground for a modern and progressive future.

Dawn is more like an extension of fox news.
 
As it seems dawn is just being emotional. Pakistanis says it is anti Pakistan, I say anti Iran :rofl:

Responsibility is something that gives credit to a media and lack of it destroys credibility of that media and dawn lacks it. I remember it's image from a Pakistani woman holding a unexploded mortar in her hands, claiming that Iran had done it. Within report, there was shamelessly said that one mortar was fired and killed a Pakistani citizen, emphasized on one as the number of fired mortars. Can you find the paradox?
Only till 2012 13 dawn was the most neutral paper in pakistan then all its name was lost some how its still better then The news.
 
Certain People here really do get excited , Over board . with any Iranian gestures towards Pakistan , so Please Just Clam down.Just smiles and fancy good pictures of solidarity between us lol
This nation. at worst is a dubious player at worst open hostile towards us and to our interest. Now harbouring our NO1 enemy gifting them a port ... lol. Enough evidence coming from there of aiding terrorists in our land. Forget the regular mortars they fire into our land. And some people here are suggesting we sell them our state of art weapon systems and defence treaties....,lol
 
Back
Top Bottom