Intolerance: can we save our future generations?

[Peaceful Civilian]

No doubt Intolerance increased after 1970s. Religious bigotry, sectarianism, extremism and terrorism increased with such PACE, it will take time to settle country. Even in 2018 elections Majority rejected Molvi/Mullah tolla, still this government did bow down to the demands of khadam rizwi right after first day of government. Our religious people uses religion and sensitive issues for cheap popularity, and for their own agenda.
People using Blasphemy laws for personal revenge and for religious hate.
Nothing positive from Molvi/Mullah tolla, they are spreading hate and poison and you will never see them on roads for protest on violations of human rights, Instead only violence on street on religious issues. Newspapers, YouTube are filled with their violence and negative activities.

 

[El Sidd]

No doubt Intolerance increased after 1970s. Religious bigotry, sectarianism, extremism and terrorism increased with such PACE, it will take time to settle country. Even in 2018 elections Majority rejected Molvi/Mullah tolla, still this government did bow down to the demands of khadam rizwi right after first day of government. Our religious people uses religion and sensitive issues for cheap popularity, and for their own agenda.
People using Blasphemy laws for personal revenge and for religious hate.
Nothing positive from Molvi/Mullah tolla, they are spreading hate and poison and you will never see them on roads for protest on violations of human rights, Instead only violence on street on religious issues. Newspapers, YouTube are filled with their violence and negative activities.

Na kar. Ghar se bahar na nikalna. India me gabbar ata tha. Pakistan me Mullah ajaega

 

[Solomon2]

I don't know why people associate intolerance with religious people.. Are liberals tolerant? .. Don't they try to impose their agenda /thinking on others ?

​

 

[SQ8]

Another “cry me a river” fluff piece looking for attention - and the typical audience will gulp it down for their enjoyment.

The subject matter is real, but the actions and presentation in it is downright fantasia and idiotic, reflectinf a detached from reality mindset for the detached from reality consumer.

 

[Solomon2]

Another “cry me a river” fluff piece looking for attention - and the typical audience will gulp it down for their enjoyment.

The subject matter is real, but the actions and presentation in it is downright fantasia and idiotic, reflectinf a detached from reality mindset for the detached from reality consumer.

No criticism of specifics? You just provided a "fluff" dismissive comment, Oscar; there's no evidence you read the article at all.

 

[SQ8]

No criticism of specifics? You just provided a "fluff" dismissive comment, Oscar; there's no evidence you read the article at all.

There is no evidence to your allegation that I did not read it. Just because I find the article full of unrealistic lamenting and disconnected from the ground reality of increasing pushback against extremism does not mean I did not read it. Infact you basing your entire assertion that I did not read it based on my stating fluff is that you are inherited incapable of accepting anything other than your own misinformed opinions and defending other misinformed or ignorant(deliberate or not)opinions that reflect your own.

 

[Solomon2]

Infact you basing your entire assertion that I did not read it based on my stating fluff is that -

is that you didn't cite an example from the article to illustrate a specific criticism.