What's new

Infra-Red Search & Track (IRST) Systems

That is very impressive. However what are its limitations? Why is the US still putting money towards IRST units on planes? Could it be that a satellite could give a larger picture without enough detail or if it have to give detail, then it has to focus on a small area? My thinking is that satellites can them be limit with you have a large battle from with a lot happening. ... ...???

its limitations would be classified and not in the public domain. The first such satellite was launched this year. and it would only be prudent to have and train with redundent systems. In a major war satellites will most likely become targets. The future though is on systems that can look down on an entire battle space. SBIRS main function is missile detection. But it's capabilities go far beyond that.

http://www.smcindustrydays.org/2007/weidenheimer.pdf


sbirs_geo1-mission_patch.jpg
 
IRST AN/AAS-42
m02010102300004.jpg

AN-AAS-42-IRST-Podded-2009-1S.jpg


AN/AAS-42 Infra-Red Search and Track System (IRSTS) (United States), Airborne electro optic (EO) systems

Type
Airborne Electro Optic (EO) targeting system.

Description
The AN/AAS-42 Infra-red Search and Track System (IRSTS) is designed to permit the multiple tracking of thermal energy emitting targets at extremely long range to augment information supplied by conventional tactical radars. The system enhances performance against low radar cross-section targets while providing immunity to electronic detection and RF countermeasures. High-resolution IRST provides dramatically improved raid cell count at maximum declaration ranges - information that can stand alone or be fused with other sensor data to enhance situational awareness.The IRSTS consists of a sensor head mounted beneath the nose of the F-14D and an electronics unit just aft of the cockpit. The system is integrated with the F-14's central computer system and complements the AN/APG-71 radar providing the aircrew both target track data and infra-red imagery displays. The AN/AAS-42 operates in six discrete modes, with selectable and individually controlled scan volumes in azimuth (±80°) and elevation (±70°).

More here
http://articles..com/articles/-Avio...rch-and-Track-System-IRSTS-United-States.html
 
Four Norwegian F-16 fighters are crossing the sky from the Lofoten Islands, after taking off to meet a call interception against targets moving toward Air Base Andoya. The F-16 was equipped with an IRST AN/AAS-42.

Flying below the formation of condensation trails (30,000 feet), the Norwegian pilots soon found six "targets." Su-27 fighters were approaching from the front at the same altitude, flying a fighter sweep pattern of type "wall Flanker" and projecting their large envelope search radar ahead. Presumably, a group of attack would come close behind.

The F-16 had their radars off and reduced engine power not to be seen by the Su-27 IRST, which is suspected to operate in the 3-5 m band, optimized to detect signatures of afterburners. As the sensor AN/AAS-42, which works in the band 8-12 mM detects the signature of air friction on the fuselage, the F-16 were able to detect and classify the approach of Su-27 before being detected. The Norwegians made ​​a stealthy ambush and defeated the Su-27 with AMRAAM firing at maximum reach.

This graphic demonstration of the potential offered by fighters equipped with IRST was made ​​by Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems in Fort Worth, Texas, in simulated air to air scenarios. The increasing performance of thermal imaging sensors has allowed IRST rivaling the radar as the sensor of choice for many applications in air-air fighter and surveillance aircraft.

See what can not be seen is characteristic of modern warfare. The current weapons can easily destroy targets, air or land after detected and identified. The ideal is to detect and locate enemy without being detected in the process. Although radar is an effective sensor, its fundamental weakness is you need to illuminate the target with energy. When you do that will identify and report their position and can still be jammer. Heat sensors and electro do not have this disabled by being passive.

The FLIR was first used in 1967 during the the Vietnam War. It proved a hit with the heat of enemy troops and equipment denouncing its position with the heat emitted. The FLIR (Forward Looking InfraRed) became a generic term for a wide range of imaging equipment heat. The FLIR first appeared in 1964 produced by Texas Instruments experience using infrared scanners used in the first linear recognition of cocoons.

The IRST, or the Search and Screening Systems Infra-Red (Infrared Search and Track) is a passive sensor, which uses the heat emitted by the target to generate data for the weapon system of an aircraft (or other platform to ship or anti-aircraft battery).

The passive operation of the IRST has the advantage of concealment. The advantage of forming high-resolution imaging also aids in visual identification (VID) over long distances. The loss of accuracy in the information range can be partially overcome with the integration of a laser rangefinder or laser radar (LADAR).

The use of sensors that detect heat to search for targets for combat aircraft is so
old as the use of these sensors for missile guidance. The first models had limited performance, since the target image is not formed. USAF aircraft of the 50s and 60s as the F-101B Voodoo, F-102 Dagger, F-104 Starfighter, F-106 Delta Dart, F-8 Crusader and F-4B Phantom were already equipped with these sensors, but with little practical use.

The IRST interceptors were installed mainly in whose targets were Bear and Bison bombers with a large IR signature flying at high altitude in clear sky and a cold setting in northern Cadaná. They could also be used to point heat-seeking missiles like the Sidewinder and Falcon. By acting the IRST passively give little warning to the target and the radar jammer could not. Soviet bombers had powerful jammers at the time.

The IRST USAF were adopted by the U.S. Navy F-4B-4 AAA sensor mounted in the nose IRST to point the AIM-9B. Were removed in later versions used for air superiority and attack.

The F-4C was equipped with an IR detector Hughes S-71N (AN/AAR-4) radome under the radar, but that He was replaced by an antenna warning radar in F-4D models. The Swedish JAS-35F Draken was also equipped with AAR-4 in the 60's.

irstf8.jpg

An AAS-15 IR sensor was installed in most F8U-2N Crusader in 1960, appearing as a horn in front of the cockpit of the aircraft.

irsttp26.jpg

The Russians have a longer history and consistent use of IRST. IRST copied the Russians and Americans settled in their Mig-25 and Mig-23 air defense from the 60's. The Mig-23 had a heat seeker TP-23 TP-23-1 or PT-23M (MiG-23ML) under the nose can detect an F-16 or 35-40 km similar to TP-26 or an appointed back with a range of 60 km. The data are shown on the HUD. The TP-26 is used to aim missiles R-60 and R-23T. The MiG-23P with computer and digital datalink 23SML Lazur-interception capacity was completely autonomous in the early 80's.

irstdraken.jpg


IRST The first of the J-35A Draken was very ineffective and short-range and differs greatly in format in later versions used in the J-35F. The sensor was manufactured by Hughes and had a range of 25km. It was appropriate for the icy regions of the Nordic countries.
The first models of the F-14 Tomcat was equipped with an IR detector AN/ALR-23 movable under the nose, which could be targeted by radar or used independently to sweep areas not monitored by radar. The indium antimonate detector was cooled by a cryogenic system Stirling cycle independent. In practice, the AN/ALR-23 was ineffective and was replaced by Northrop AN/AXX-1 Television Camera Set (TCS).

The pilots of the F-14 Bombcat realized that the LANTIRN FLIR sensor was more efficient to check targets at long range that the TCS. The FLIR has zoom 4, 10 and 20 times and can be pointed 150 degrees off axis of the aircraft. With datalink FTI, the image of the FLIR can be transmitted over long distances along with images of TARPS reconnaissance pod and TCS.
The first were simply IRST FLIR cameras with a simple system of tracking and accuracy. Recent projects have increased capacity, including a great deal of searching, acquiring autonomous distant targets, accurate tracking of multiple targets, rate of false warning of targets very low in all conditions, passive distance estimation, comparable image quality to cameras High Definition TV, and integration with other sensors and weapons onboard.

The ability of the IRST varies according to operating frequency. For example, operating in the band of 2 microns the sensor detects only taskmasters rocket afterburner and the cavity of the turbine. In the band of 4 microns and detects the aforementioned hot parts of the fuselage and the band of 8 microns for all the above and to the turbulence.

The difference between a FLIR and IRST is one that shows the latest data from sources of heat in the same format as a radar screen can also inform the distance using a laser rangefinder or estimate. The FLIR is a heat sensor that forms the front images to be displayed to the pilot and use in navigation and target acquisition in a narrow FOV. The IRST today are capable of forming high-resolution images can be used to purchase with a narrow FOV and visual identification.
irstf8noradar.jpg
 
The IRST use current technology focus plan of arrangement (FPA - Focal Plane Arrays) that are several thermal imaging cameras to form a single set. The system is lighter, smaller, requires less cooling, is more reliable and potentially cheaper than the old electromechanical systems.
The ASRAAM and AIM-9X missiles were the first air-air technology to employ in an FPA 128 x 128 array of sensors. Images with long wave HgCdTe sensors promise to increase the detection range. For short-wave applications, the PTSI arrangements are another alternative. The search head of the IIR missiles today can form an image of the target. The missile can have your French MICA sensor used as search IRST under the command of the driver's helmet sight or radar.

The main requirements for the IRST fighters are:

- Search and automatic tracking of the IR signature of aircraft in flight over long distances in a large field of view and in every way (looking up, down, same altitude
and against background noise).

- Capacity and assistance in engaging multiple targets simultaneously and in the delivery of weapons in a heavy electronic countermeasures environment.

- Output for sensor fusion, to increase security and confidence, improve detection, reduce ambiguity and improve the performance of radar, weapons and electronic warfare systems.

- Show high resolution images for visual identification (VID) of targets to the pilot.

- Have a way to aid the landing at night and adverse weather conditions.

- Have a mode of navigation and terrain avoidance.

- Have a way for air to ground target location and designation of looking down.

- Display relevant information and video presentation on the HUD, HMD and HDD.

- Sensor assist in case of radar to be suffering interference.

irstflir.jpg


A Third Generation FLIR showing a C-141 taxiing to 20 miles away.

The performance of an IRST depends on a combination of factors. The maximum number of targets that can be tracked simultaneously is directly related to the processing capacity. Although the actual number of true targets in the field of view of the sensor may be very small, a large processing capacity is needed to ensure that it will not be canceled in the presence of "clutter" such as banks of clouds. In each case, the accuracy of screening should be optimized to support functions such as locking a missile seeker head or sensor fusion.

The detection range is the distance at which the signature of the target exceeds a certain threshold, which is usually determined as 90-95% probability of detection. Some IRST build a history of screening, using various associations between detections, before declaring the result to the weapon system. This "declaration of power" should be as large as possible to prepare the response in the form of delivery of weapons, launching countermeasures or escape maneuvers.

The field of view (Field Of Vision - FOV) that the user selected in the field of view (Field Of Regard - FOR) depends on the circumstances of the IRST. For maximum coverage, the FOV must occupy the whole FOR. With a lower value can reduce the time to complete a sweep, with a higher refresh rate. Another alternative is to allow the use of larger integration time at the detector, with a greater range against a certain target. The goal is to have a false alarm rate of less than five hours in a FOV of 30 x 50 degrees.

The IRST are passive but can be detected with scanning laser that detects the brightness of the IR filter from the sensor. If you have a laser rangefinder IRST their emissions can be detected by a laser warning system (Laser Warning Receiver - LWR). Infrared sensors are passive but can be jameados with a powerful laser that saturates the sensor and can even burn it.

The Russians have a tendency to use laser rangefinders mines as a weapon to damage the human eyes and optical sensors easier. The Air Force tested this ability in the program by proposing a Compass Hammer traqueador able to detect the optical brightness of the direct firing of cannon and a powerful green laser to blind source for the gunner and fire control system. Westinghouse designed the cocoon Advanced Optical Countermeasures tested in the mid-80 to equip the B-52 but not entered service. The countermeasure against laser glasses with several layers of different filter specific wavelengths. The glasses must be used continuously for the visible and invisible laser does not give warning.


Tiseo

An electrooptical system used at the end of the Vietnam conflict was the TV telescopic stabilized. One reason was the need to identify aircraft visually before firing weapons. The American aircraft were great and were at a disadvantage against small and Vietnamese MiGs were still smoky. The next generation was even greater with the F-14 and F-15 being greater than the F-4. The Americans were in the ridiculous position of systems using long range weapons and be forced to fight at close range. TV telescopic reversed this situation, allowing visual identification beyond human vision.

The first telescopic TV camera into the stable operation was AN/ASX-1 Target Identification Set Electro-Optical (Tiseo) Northrop. The result of the program was Tiseo Rivet Haste during the Vietnam conflict. The Tiseo entered service in the 70s in the USAF, the F-4E initially and then be installed on F-15 but was canceled.

The installation of Tiseo the F-15 was abandoned in 1972. In 1987 we started a similar project called "Eagle Eye III" with a sensor that would be mounted at the root of the left wing in the same place prepared to take the Tiseo. The sensor would be 40cm long and 10cm in diameter. The TV footage would be shown on the radar screen. The sensor was canceled for lack of funds and some fighters began taking Leopold scopes attached to the structure of HUD.

The Tiseo was installed in the last F-4E production and retrofitted on older models. The images are shown on the radar screen of the WSO. The Tiseo may be appointed by the APQ-120 radar and a modernization could be appointed by the navigation system point to point on the ground. He was employed at the end of the Vietnam conflict successfully. The Iranian F-4E used Tiseo equipped with Combat Tree Tiseo and to detect, identify and attack the Iraqi MiG-21 long-range Sparrow missile.

In tests in the desert, the tactics of penetration of F-111 were questioned after these aircraft were easily detected, identified and "cleared" by long distance simulated by MiG F-4E equipped with Tiseo.

irsttiseof4.jpg

The Tiseo is installed at the root of the left wing of the F-4E.
irsttiseo2.jpg



Photo of an image of a Tiseo made ​​from an Iranian F-4E showing an Iraqi Mig-23 at the time an AIM-54 Phoenix detonates next to you. The fight occurred on September 25, 1980 with the missile being fired by Major Naghdi. The F-14A was flying at 6,000 m and 8 km from the Mig-23 when Phoenix was fired at the MiG approaching and maneuvering violently. In the same combat a Phantom II MiG-23 shot down a Sparrow shot with a 5 km away. Pilots liked the Tiseo Iranian F-4E with excellent results and hoped to receive the AN/AX-1 TCS in their F-14 but the revolution prevented the installation would be done after the aircraft are received.
 
AN/AXX-1 Television Camera Set (TCS)

The Tiseo was modified by the U.S. Navy as TVSU (Sight Unit Television) and tested between 1977 to 1978 with great success. Northrop was hired to adapt it for use in naval and turned AN/AXX-1 Television Camera Set (TCS).

The TVSU was used in the second phase of the exercises Aceval and showed the importance of TVSU that equipped the F-14 for 185 missiles fired electronically. The TVSU allowed visual identification of the long distance of 175 shots. The first TCS were incorporated into F-14 Block 125 in the early 80's.

The TCS consists of a TV camera stabilized high-resolution field of view (FOV) of 1.42 square degrees to search and another zoom of 0.44 degrees for target identification. The images appear just above the radar screen of the pilot and the WSO panel. TCS scans an area 15 degrees to each side of the axis of the aircraft can be appointed by the radar (AWG-9 and APG-71), the F-14D IRST, independently or manually by the WSO. The electronics have algorithm for automatic target tracking which increases the capacity of electronic countermeasures against radar will not deviate from the target. Aircraft doing tricks "bemaning" are easily monitored.

The TCS is used to visually locate an enemy at long range and identify it and avoid friendly fire. The TCS allows you to inspect targets at long range before engaging at least a day and a good time. TCS does not have the radar, but helps a lot in identifying what is important when the rules of engagement specify that it is necessary to visually identify the target before shooting. TCS enables them to gain crucial seconds in combat. TCS, and Tiseo, identifies an F-5 to about 18km, a 60km C-130, F-111 a 70km, a DC-10 to 135km.

A practical example of the use of TCS is the use of AWG-9 radar to detect a Tu-22 Backfire and points the TCS with the radar. The aircraft is identified and the long-range F-14 launches the Sparrow missile attack illuminating the target with the radar. The Tu-22 reacts with its powerful radar jammers and F-14 loses traqueamento the target, but still retains the TCS appointed to the radar target and the target continued to shine properly with a narrow beam radar.

TCS is also used for evaluation raid against targets flying very close, and after the attack is to battle damage assessment.

Depending on the rules of engagement TCS allows visual identification at a distance 7.3 times greater than the visual range. By tracking the target the pilot can see you're doing offensive and defensive maneuvers, or is firing missiles. Pictures are written to analyze after air.

irsttcs3.jpg

The TCS uses two vindicon TV, a narrow and a zoom zoom off.
irsttcs2.jpg

The TCS consists of two Weapon Replaceable Assemblies (WRA), the telescope and the black box with electronics. The two cameras are on a moving assembly in the field of view of 30 degrees centered on the axis of the aircraft. The sensor moves 30 degrees per second and stabilized at 150 degrees per second.

irsttcsirst.jpg

irsttcsirst.jpg


In the F-14D TCS was installed along with the IRST. Originally the F-14A had a set of infrared sensing AN/ALR-23 at the site of TCS but proved unreliable and was replaced by TCS. The ALR-23's limited range, with data of poor quality and false heat sources detected. The IRST technology improved with increased reliability and greater range.

irsttcs4.jpg

irsttcs.jpg


Image of TCS during a match against a Libyan MiG-23 in the Gulf of Sidra on January 4, 1989. The TCS is a visual enhancement system that identifies the type a game about 24km.
 
PIRATE

The IRST European projects outside the Russian systems were led by a consortium led by Thales Optronics Eurofirst UK (ex-Pilkington Thorn Optronics), FIAR (Italy) and Tecnobit (Spain). The team is developing the IRST PIRATE (Passive Infra-Red Airborne Track Equipment) to complement the radar for the Eurofighter Typhoon, through a contract signed in 1992. Thales is responsible for the technical authority and software, FIAR is responsible for program management and cons and the integration and qualification Tecnobit and is responsible for logistical support.

irstpirate1.jpg


The PIRATE is installed on the left side of the Eurofighter Typhoon the front of the cabin. The PIRATE is integrated with the AIS (Attack and Identification System) for the Eurofighter.

The system is water cooled with a weight of 60 kg and volume of 45 liters, with consumption
550 W. The use of high performance optical systems atermalizados, a detector Iiagem infrared (IIR) second-generation highly sensitive in the band that sweeps from 3 to 11 mM in two bands (3-5 mM and 8-10 mm), and an algorithm advanced with more than 190,000 lines of Ada code allows the hacker to detect the hot parts of the engine exhaust and surfaces heated by friction with air. When the sensor superresfriar even small temperature changes can be detected at long range. Although no upper limit was set, the distance of 150 km is accepted, and the typical is 50 to 80 km. PIRATE detected in the tests and Tornado aircraft Mig-29 to more than 100km.

The data output can be directed to any of the MFD cockpit or HUD. Other images can be generated in the HMD, can act as FLIR and IRST. The use of processing techniques to enhance data output, improving image resolution of targets.

The manufacturer claims the system is capable of displaying high-resolution images for visual identification (VID) of target-to-air and air-surface, being very useful at night. The system uses signal processing derived from Racal-Thorn Air Defence Alerting Device (ADAD), which showed a suppression rate of false alarms too high. The PIRATE will be integrated with other sensors to the aircraft sensor fusion. You can also find low flying targets and show information for accuracy.

More than 200 targets can be tracked simultaneously with multiple modes:

- Multiple Target Track (MTT) or multiple target tracking high-speed (more than 500 simultaneously). The sensor scans a given volume of space looking at potential targets with precision of 0.25 μrad [0.0143 °] in a variable FOV;

- Single Target Track (STT) or screening and identification of single target. The sensor is highly accurate screening for a single designated target. Accuracy is greater than the Eurofighter's Captor radar;

- Single Target Track Ident (STTI). Perform visual identification (VID) with better resolution;

- Sector Acquisition or acquisition mode engaged. The sensor scans on the direction of another sensor, such as the ERC-90 Captor radar, RWR or HMD;

- Slaved Acquisition. The sensor is adjusted via data link (MIDS) for an external platform, such as an AWACS aircraft. When a target is found, the sensor switches to STT, automatically.

When the target is tracked and identified, the sensor data are used to aim weapons, including ASRAAM, large viewing angle.

The use of the PIRATE and MIDS is an alternative method to detect without emitting radar. The Eurofighter can remain silent with the MIDS and IRST detecting targets without issue.
irstpirate2.jpg


Court's internal PIRATE. The system uses more than 50 integrated circuits. IIR sensor is stabilized to keep the target in sight.

The Pirate has a system of dual field of view to search large area and high resolution image of long-range, with applications for air-ground operations and is optimized for search and screening air to air and can be used as a marker to detect thermal of ground targets. The image obtained by the position to the left of the cockpit, with 60 degrees to as low as possible, is ideal for air-ground missions. The lateral location limits the effectiveness of air-ground and sensor / designator separately may be required for offensive operations. The field of vision is not as good as an IRST under the wings for air-to-earth, and has limitations for assessing battle damage.

Air-surface mode can operate in the PIRATE help navigation, terrain following at low altitude at night and landing in bad weather.

Among the additional capabilities that are being studied are examined tracking and multi-spectral identification, search and tracking ground targets, multiple target tracking and integration with a database image to improve navigation and situational awareness, missile warning industry front and missile warning of increased focus.

irstpirate4.jpg


irstpirate5.jpg


An early version of the prototype was tested PIRATE DA7 for testing installation in 2001. Began to fly in an aircraft Falcon 20D along with other instruments for testing between January and October 2002. Flight tests of the complete Eurofighter PIRATE started in June 2002 with certification in August 2003.

Updated: March 15, 2007

http://sistemadearmas.sites.uol.com.br/ca/irst.html
 
The F-16 had their radars off and reduced engine power not to be seen by the Su-27 IRST, which is suspected to operate in the 3-5 m band, optimized to detect signatures of afterburners. As the sensor AN/AAS-42, which works in the band 8-12 mM detects the signature of air friction on the fuselage, the F-16 were able to detect and classify the approach of Su-27 before being detected.

From here Super lightning – of the Pakistan Air Force fighter aircraft JF-17BLOCK2 | WAREYE looks like the WMD-7 operates in the 3-5 micron band as well.
 
DAMOCLES from here: Super lightning – of the Pakistan Air Force fighter aircraft JF-17BLOCK2 | WAREYE

although a new generation of optical laser device known as pods, such as DAMOCLES working distance can be over 40 kilometers, but the operation that is, to more than 10,000 meters altitude,

and more from here: http://forum.keypublishing.com/archive/index.php?t-63511.html

Damocles Targeting Pod
The Damocles navigation and targeting pod was developed by Thomson-CSF Optronique (now
Thales). The company's experience in this area goes back to the 1970s with the development of the
first-generation ATLIS TV/laser-targeting pod, followed by the second-generation CLDP 8-12μ system
in the early 1990s. Development of the Damocles pod started in the mid 1990s and was partially
financed by the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which had ordered the system for its Mirage 2000-9s.
The Damocles pod has been introduced into French Navy service and is operational on carrier-based
Super Etendard aircraft.
The Damocles pod, in its baseline configuration, has a third-generation thermal-imagery camera,
working in the waveband of 3-5 μm, and a navigational forward-looking IR (FLIR) sensor mounted in
the pylon. The navigational FLIR sensor has a 24x18-degrees field of view. The main sensor is used for
targeting purposes, with selectable fields of view: wide (4x3º), intermediate, and narrow (1x0.75º). It is
fully stabilized, enabling an observation range of up to 40-50 km. Along with the camera, the Damocles
pod is also equipped with two laser sets working in the 1.5- and 1.06-μm wavebands, used for range
finding, target designation, and laser spot tracking. The lasers' ranges enables them to be used from
outside the firing envelope of many air-defense systems. The Damocles camera and lasers can be cued
to the target by other aircraft systems, including indirectly by the RBE2 radar. The pod has also an
automatic track mode. The laser-designation system of the Damocles pod is compatible with Paveway
II and III, Alenia/MBDA PGM-500 and PGM-2000 HAKIM, and Elbit Lizard guided bombs.
 
Further on this interesting topic, here is seeing colour at night using infra-red: http://www.iaf.fraunhofer.de/Images/IAF JB2006_tcm42-39764.pdf . Check from page 44. On page 46 it says the technology is already commercialized. I know they say missiles like the IR Python and PL-5EII are multi-element. I am wondering if this is the same type of technology they have …??? Anybody knows?
 
IRST is interesting, but will never replace a radar. It's far too vulnerable to environmental issues. IR is very close to visible light, and that means whatever blocks visible light, also blocks IR. A cloud layer can hide a fighter. Dust, smoke, fog, any number of things block the IR signal. And the sun (and flares) can overload a sensitive system.

One can obtain azimuth and elevation, but range data is almost impossible to determine. And range is crucial for effective missile intercept geometry.

IMO, IR technology is far more useful when it is part of a ground-attack package, or a missile seeker, as opposed to a primary tracking device. By the time even the best IRST set can detect another fighter, that fighter has already launched using radar data.
 
The Su-27SM aircraft, first flown in December 2002, now is ready for state trials. The modernization included changes to the cockpit and fire-control system, as well as improving weapons range. The aircraft will be able to perform not only air-to-air missions but also daytime air-to-ground and all-weather supression of enemy air defenses (SEAD) and tactical air support for maritime operations. The Su-27SM received a glass cockpit with two MM-10 6x8-in. multifunction color displays and a single MFI-9 4x5-in. multifunction color display, as well as an improved SILS-27M HUD. The fire-control system received modifications to the radar (a slightly modified version of the N001M radar found on Chinese Su-27MKK2 aircraft) enabling it to perform ground- and sea-target detection. The air-to-air functions were also improved, with the employment of R-77 active-radar medium-range missiles. The OEPS-27 infrared search-and-track (IRST) system has been replaced by the OEPS-30-I (31E-MK). The range of the laser rangefinder is 10 km against ground and 8 km against air targets. It can also illuminate targets for the Kh-29L missile, the only laser-guided weapon used by Su-27SM.

OEPS-27
http://militaryforces.ru/weapon-1-13-75.html

220px-Su-27UB_cockpit.jpg

OEPS-30-I (31E-MK). ON su-27^^​

125n7vd.jpg
 
if you read the following magazine p/22; you will discover that URAL Optical & Mechanical Plant [UOMZ] is being given the contract to design & fabricate IRSTs for modern Russian fleet the like of MiG-35/29 & SU-35/30 & T-50 plus the Ka-52 Alligators & Mi-8/7 Hinds.

Take-Off Mag 2011

I have gathered the info from this manufacturer & screenshots had been joined together in a single online pdf file...see this (preferable in fullscreen)

UOMZ optronics Helis & Planes
 

Back
Top Bottom