Indigenous solution for air defense command center

[Dazzler]

AIR DEFENCE COP & COMMAND CENTERS

1. Plot Fusion & Display
2. SRT / MRT
3. Track Display & Management
4. Interception Tools
5. TDR Interface for Giraffe
6. Threat Evaluation Management
7. GIS Integration
8. DEM/DTED Terrain Data Integration
9. Common Operational Picture

 

[PakShaheen79]

Kahan se aya yeh solution, kis ne banaya yeh solution??

(From where this solution emerged, who made this solution?)

 

[Rank]

AIR DEFENCE COP & COMMAND CENTERS

1. Plot Fusion & Display
2. SRT / MRT
3. Track Display & Management
4. Interception Tools
5. TDR Interface for Giraffe
6. Threat Evaluation Management
7. GIS Integration
8. DEM/DTED Terrain Data Integration
9. Common Operational Picture

View attachment 621042

I have expertise in designing such high-performance GIS applications including (CMMS-EAM). I am involved and working on such projects in which esri/bing/google/custom maps been used.

 

[khansaheeb]

I have expertise in designing such high-performance GIS applications including (CMMS-EAM). I am involved and working on such projects in which esri/bing/google/custom maps been used.

and .. what is your opinion?

 

[Rank]

and .. what is your opinion?

My opinion is Pakistanis have very limited experience and expertise in such kind of thingy especially when it comes to military technology. That's all I can say. Indians are very good at and into these. I have seen and met a couple of Indians in the west. They're working in defense hardware manufacturers in Germany, France, UK, and the US.

Besides that, we are manufacturing mil hardware tho we could develop that but the problem is we are absolutely zero in R&D when it comes to the future gen quite frankly.

 

[khansaheeb]

My opinion is Pakistani has very limited experience in such kind of thingy esp when it comes to the mil technology. That's all I can say... Indians are very good at these things esp many Indians are working in defense hardware manufacturers in Germany, France, UK, and US. Besides that, we are manufacturing mil hardware the problem is we are absolutely zero in R&D when it comes to the future gen quite frankly.

Unless you try how are you going to build your experience?

 

[Rank]

Unless you try how are you going to build your experience?

I have zero working experience in any defense industry. Their requirements could be different but I am very good at interface and experience designing. I can do the front end part including the integration. The problem here is who gonna develop that kind of state of the art future generation military hardware and software? Guess what from the last three years we hardly achieve or done anything in ACE.

We are actually good at integrations but developing anything from scratch and indigenously with our own power, resources and expertise which full fills our future air-power requirements, trust me I am literally surprised if we could do this. Mostly we are using third party components from dev to hardware for the development of our things. I'm very specific about the future gen mil tech.

 

[khansaheeb]

I have zero working experience in any defense industry. Their requirements could be different but I am very good at interface and experience designing. I can do the front end part including the integration. The problem here is who gonna develop that kind of future Gen stuff? Did you know from the last three years we hardly achieve or done anything in ACE. We are good at integrations but developing anything which accommodates or full fill the future air-power requirements, I'm not sure about that. Mostly we are using third party components from dev to hardware for developing our hardware. We hardly produce anything indigenous so far (I'm very specific about the future gen mil tech).

Always think solutions is my motto. Once a problem is identified engineers and scientists always manage to find a solution.

 

[Rank]

Always think solutions is my motto. Once a problem is identified engineers and scientists always manage to find a solution.

I literally just said this. We are solving our solutions by adopting third parties developed components and hardware. We can't produce anything indigenously. What I've seen is we mostly hide behind this argument that we don't have funds. You don't need funds for basic R&D brav. The problem here is a lack of leadership, planning, enthusiasm to make from scratch and a strong approach to make something entirely own. As I said before we are good at integrations.

For me, if you really want to achieve anything (very specific about the future / next 10 - 20 years) in the spectrum of military technology, you have to build your own stuff. The market is very competitive and costly. R&D is MUST. We always dependent on others that what history tells us. JF17 story is literally a crap when someone says hey this is entirely our own thingy. That fucking argument went to flush when you can't even do anything on your own with respect to V3 and went to Chinese for adding big-bore piston into your machine which you used to claim "indigenously" / "Independent" / "Our own".

We hardly show any constructive, practical and productive approach towards "Future" military hardware manufacturing rather just fill-fulling the gaps. You can't survive like this in the long run. Everyone has missiles, MRLS, fighters, etc so what's new in that? the only winner is who is LEADING the industry, who is developing things entirely on their own, who are more into R&D for developing future technology. These radars, surveillance systems are highly sophisticated things, we are good at driving but we hardly know ****** about what's inside that.

I know what happened with SAAB and who helped us to repair that machine. I have seen that damage thingy myself. Trust me we haven't been able to repair until foreign instructions, interference, and help. We might spend years to repair that.

I hope you get my point.

 

[khansaheeb]

I literally just said this. We are solving our solutions by adopting third parties developed components and hardware. We can't produce anything indigenously. What I've seen is we mostly hiding behind this argument that we don't have funds. You don't need funds for basic R&D brav. The problem here is a lack of leadership, planning, enthusiasm to make from scratch and a strong approach to make something entirely our own few factors name a few. As I said before we are good in integrations.

For me, if you really want to achieve anything (very specific about the future / next 10 - 20 years) in the spectrum of military technology, you have to build your own stuff. The market is very competitive and costly. R&D is MUST. We always dependent on others that what history tells us. JF17 story is literally a crap when someone says hey this is entirely our own thingy. That fucking statement went to flush when you can't even do anything on your own with respect to V3 and went to Chinese for adding big-bore piston into your machine which you claim "indigenously" / "Independent".

We hardly show or produced any constructive, practical and productive "Future" military hardware. Everyone has missiles, MRLS, fighters, etc the only winner is who is LEADING the industry, who is developing things entirely on their own, who are more into R&D for developing future technology. These radars, surveillance systems are highly sophisticated things, we are good in driving but we hardly know ****** about what's inside that.

I know about how we actually repaired SAAB. I have seen that damage thingy myself. Trust me we haven't been able to repair until foreign instructions, interference, and help. We might spend years to repair that.

I hope you get my point.

Short cuts are poor investments and that's what are planners are doing. From experience I found that it is easier to design and develop something yourself than use or modify someone else's work. We must open up special economic zones for targeted high tech industries not limited to AI, Super computer design and manufacture, Semiconductor manufacturing, displays and storage etc. Time to setup a silicon valley in Islamabad and Karachi with integrated and connected Universities. Let the combined forces manage these and allow civilian spin offs of appropriate non military sub-products. If government puts investment in they must be repaid with profit by the organisation that benefitted from the investment.

 

[Itachi]

AIR DEFENCE COP & COMMAND CENTERS

1. Plot Fusion & Display
2. SRT / MRT
3. Track Display & Management
4. Interception Tools
5. TDR Interface for Giraffe
6. Threat Evaluation Management
7. GIS Integration
8. DEM/DTED Terrain Data Integration
9. Common Operational Picture

View attachment 621042

Can you make the images smaller?? I can still see the some parts of Pakistan...