Nonsense. India can not act selectively on some muslims while sparing others. It has to be either everyone or none.
I always said that Saudis support Pakistan and Don and support India. I don't see why you are arguing. I only said that Arabs are compelled to give investment though they don't like it.
India has about 1 crore dharmic Indian working abroad. 20 lakh in Africa, 35 Lakh in Americas, 20 lakh in Europe and rest in Middle east. I don't see why Africa will expel Hindus as Hindus are mainly traders and good source of reliable supply. We are more than capable of taking back small population if these migrants. The job gained by expelling 20 crore muslims will be able to be shifted to these people.
As I said, we don't count cost of war. The remittance and other things are only because of oil production. If the region is destabilised, then the economy of Arab region along with world will collapse due to lack of oil. So, it is an accepted loss of economy.
3rd world country doesn't mean weak. Good luck assuming that CPEC can replace Arabian sea.
This is just wishful thinking. India has much more strength in terms of Indigenous Technology compared to entire Islamic world. Major Wars can't be fought on imported weapons.
I don't know why you are acting childishly. pakistan has 6 lakh soldiers. India has 13 lakh soldiers. I am talking of recruiting militia soldiers in numbers like 1 crore (I gave example of WW2 recruitment for this).
Why will South India or Sikhs stay away from fighting Islam? You are forgetting Sikhs were killed by Pakistani in 1947, Hyderabad Nizam attacked hindus and many other reason for every dharmic to fight. As I mentioned before, the current forces strength is for current requirement. If the requirement changes, we will recruit more into militia. So, there will be enough fighters.
Lol, talking of muslim underworld being able to beat Hindus is a joke. Underworld or not, Hindus have much higher number and firepower.
Entire world Economy will crumble if oil supply is destabilised. So, nothing to be Happy. I have said clearly that India will attack only if it loses its Economy because of not getting investment and remittance. If India gets these, then India will not attack. So, if India attacks, it means that Indian Economy is already tumbling. So, nothing to lose here.
I have been saying that Muslim countries have to give remittance and investment for india to be quiet. My scenario of war is when muslim countries stop giving these. Then you can't talk of losing the money as India is not getting anything at all.
Give me evidence that India is selling itself against China. There is no real anger against Chinese. I don't see why India would try to contain Chinese when the real problem is from USA. India would rather ally with China to take down USA. You make no sense but simply are talking media propaganda.
China can't claim most of Indian land. Areas like NE, Ladakh has people who like India. Why will they accept China? Secondly, these areas are minimal and have no relevance to China. China won't risk war to get some barren land.
5.5 crore muslims live in Bangladesh border in west Bengal, Assam and Bihar. Another 4 crore live in UP and 3 crore live near Pakistan border of Kashmir, Rajasthan, Gujarat. So, they can be pushed easily. Regardless of whether muslims live far from border or not, dharmica indus will give them train and bus facility to reach the border. If they use violence, then they will be attacked. Choice will be clear - leave or die.
Geographically you have a country three times size of Pakistan, have a large land mass to man the border, you not only have to content with Pakistani firepower but also Chinese are starring you down. As for militia, if you are talking about the sanghi and bakth brigade of Hindu terrorists, all they can do is to swing some danda and lathi as per their training in the RSS terrorist schools. Besides, you are not armed society like Pakistanis are.
This is not 1947, a lot of water has passed under the bridge since. Sikhs are more interested in their Khalistan and south, as I said earlier got no dog in this fight.
Dawood Ibrahim is kept safe for a reason . Will be unleashed when required. Sanghis and Bhakhts are only good at lynching, not in fighting a guerrilla warfare.
PMIK is already saying that Muslims genocide will happen in India, thats with or without Muslims money , so your argument is invalid. Your assumption that India is holding Muslim population at ransom is laughable. No Arab ruler gives a toss about Muslims, they don't even care about their own Arab brothers in Palestine.
Its a geopolitical fact. You fought war with China just to please your western masters and get their approval and rating, even though you lost the war. Your whole nuke programme was based on bogus threat from China. Whole western civilization is trying to pump you up as a bulwark against China. Who you are trying to fool?
China are clamming the lands you consider as your sovereignty over, infact they recently trash your constitutional changes and told you on your face that Laddakh is their territory. Your rants are getting silly with each reply.
As you have rightly pointed out, most of Indian Muslims are far away from Pakistani borders, hence not our problem. You go ahead with your plans for ethnic cleansing of Muslims, Pakistani state will have no issues, we will be waiting licking our lips to take many opportunities that come our way as a result of your attempts.
Well another silly dharma rant. For your information, India is the sole country where your dharmic Hindus live which has a long history of being invaded, looted and ruled by non-Hindu dharmic invaders since ancient times. Its the only Hindu concentrated country on this planet Earth. While Muslims enjoy a lavish number of more than 52 countries to their name scattered all across the globe and have a perfect record of their salient history of their centuries long global rule including present day 'Dharmic India' too.
1) Now back to your points. Do your country have enough military, economic, logistical, political strength and will to dispose off 2 crore (200 million) people of your country into the sea let alone forced migration to other countries just within a few weeks or even months! You would just touch a few hundred thousands by then the global war (Jihad) would be upon you both internally and externally. And how about in that chaotic times, someone from outside just slips weapons to a few thousands and gradually few millions of them. All your great Dharmic Military Heft along with your freshly conscripted RSS dharmic would be consumed just trying to fight for their own survival from this onslaught let alone the humiliations you may face on every side of your borders.
2) Your second point Saudis are not compelled to invest in India by so called 'indian might'. They the Arab leaders are great opportunists, they see opportunities of selling oil and their production of massive petrochemical industry to poor starving more than billion populatiin of India and in return the so called Dharmic India exports their own Dharmic Pavitar Mother Cow to those Gulf countries to be butchered, stewed and eaten with sauces. As a X resident of the Gulf and eye witness to it, I could surely say that Yes the India is one of the biggest suppliers of cow and cow meat to the Gulf. First go save your own mother from that wholesale slaughter then comeback to PDF to rant about your dharmic country.
3) Well your next point exactly describes your dharmic intellectual levels.
I never mentioned Africa in my post.
And then you blatantly claimed that you don't count cost of war! And economic loss is acceptable to already malnutritioned population of India! Well what would be your strategy when you would have to face economic blockade past few weeks into that hypothetical war??? Your oil reserves would dry up, no fuel for your planes to fly, no fuel for your logistic convoys to reach the fronts, no fuel for your IFVs/Tanks to fight, no fuel for your navy to operate ships, no fuel-no more war.
All your Dharmic sena would be bogged down by lack of fuel and supplies. For reference plz study history of Nazi Germany that why did they used their most modern heavily armored tanks as pill boxes and armored bunkers late in the war. Now your enemy would just have to wait and continue this economic seige for just a few more weeks until the
mighty dharmic sena surrenders for itself due to shear hunger, starvation and lack of munitions and fuel supplies.
4) Now next point about your
CPEC bashing. No we would have the biggest share of trade route through Arabian sea by then from rest of Asia, Africa, Europe to sea ports of Karachi and Gwadar all the to China, Central asian states and Russia. You may talk about the part of Indian Ocean that India has left with. Do you know the fact, who is the biggest industrial producer of the world?
It's China who is one of the top trade partners to each and every civilized developing or developed country on this globe. When China would utilize CPEC and other of its Belt and Road Initiatives then Good luck with your Dharmic navy patrolling a part of indian ocean containing majority of shipments of your own country or other smaller South East Asian states. China would switch most of its trade to CPEC and other BRI projects considering the
safety and cost effectiveness of these trade routes in time of peace as well as war. And by the way China is also one of the biggest oil importers of the Gulf.
5) Now talk about your
Indian indegenous industrial capability rant and self reliance of its arms and ammunition. It's the most funny part of the long list of your bull sh*t arguments. Factually it's the other way around.
As a matter of universal fact india is one of the biggest arms importer country in the world. I know many Indians have perhaps a unique dharmic talent, expertise and tendency to deny the facts altogether, thats why I mentioned universal fact. Indian military for example relies heavily on foreign military equipment including imported weapons systems, their ammunition, spare parts and logistics on foreign suppliers like Russia, Israel, US and EU countries. On the other hand, the starc comparison of
Muslim world's most prominent militaries ie Turkey, Iran and Pakistan are highly self sufficient in most of their weapons system manufacturing and their maintenance. Turkey alone surpasses India by a huge margin with respect to advanced industrial base and its military technology in each and every field except of nuclear weapons.
6) Now talking about military personnel strength conscription/recruiting in war time scenario etc. India since its independence from British may have not passed through those circumstances and experiences which Pakistan has faced in its past owing to the shear contrast of its landmass, cultural/religious background, population and resource comparison to its adversaries. Here in Pakistani (include pure Afghan Pshtoons too)
tradition mostly people have been more eager to fight and embrace shahadat (martyrdom) fighting on Frontlines in the way of Allah against the anti Islam anti Muslim rivals (but not the peaceful non combatants) till victory or shahadat and more fiercely than people of any part of the world. The people of Pakistan in previous major wars except 1971(which was really political sh*t, complicated, chaotic and embarrassing against own Muslim population doomed to be lost) people from all over the country supported their military stood by them and were eager to volunteer and lay their lives at the Frontlines for a just cause. As you yourself said
when you would try to suppress and corner over 200 million Muslims, we as your external adversary would have the privilege to recruit only a few hundred thousands of those Muslims let alone millions, enough to engage all of your dharmic military might within your own streets. And no military in this world, regardless of its might, technological superiority, and fierceness can never fight a major border war conflict and civil war uprising simultaneously.
The war would be over sooner than you anticipated.
7) The last point I would like to answer would be related to Sikhs. 1947 was a chaotic year indeed, everyone wanted and tried to get a greater share of the pie that the British were going to leave behind. So in massive unprecedented migration of people across newly formed borders was a mess. Leave alone Hindus, talking specifically about Sikhs and Muslims both killed, massacred each other as per opportunity given. Many of them left their homelands to go to the other side of the border in the search for peace in spite of the whole hearted offers of protection from the majority of other's religion neighborhoods and friends. By then most of the Sikhs were in support of the bigger and
proclaimed 'secular' state of India. So the result was very much even both the sides shed blood of the other in a continuous cycle of action and its reactions etc. After that soon Sikhs of Punjab and even dalits and a part of indian muslims
realized that the dreams of proclaimed 'secular' state and freedom for all its population were all all fake and deceitful. They then realized that they should have spoken for their own rights and independent states during British Raj as per the famous two nation theory the bases of creation of Pakistan. But it was too late by now. So they started various
freedom movements like Sikhs Khalistan against oppressive hindu dominated India. Which was brutally crushed for the time being in major gun fights inside sacred temple of Sikhs. So there are so much commonalities between Punjabi Muslims and Sikhs such as mother language, culture, region and above all the common enemy a hegemonic extremist Hindu dominated Indian Govt. So they grew closer and friendly relations that's why our PM Imran Khan and COAS both are strongly supporting Kartarpur border crossing project to further extend mutual beneficial friendship with the Punjabi Sikhs. And RSS backed fanatic hindu BJP Govt is crying over it and deploying delaying tactics.
@Arsalan @The Eagle
Disclaimer: The term 'Dharm', 'Dharmic' and Indian Hindus oppression against your own Indian National Muslims, KSA's yourself proclaimed and alleged payment of some kind of ransom money to 'powerful' India, 'Indian military heft', etc. were all introduced by you first.
Every other of your comments are meaningless repetitions or more of bull sh*t rant that didn't really deserve a response.
. OK if that's true then why not you can successfully design, mass produce and induct a simple jet plane with all the subsystems designed and manufactured by those dharmic. If you are so advanced why you still buy those AKs from Russians let alone all the other military equipment. Now just for example Turkey has one of the world's most advanced MBT Altay, advanced highly lethal T-129 attack helicopter which has highest thrust to weight ratio in its category, designed, manufactured and exported their own rifle MPT-76, MPT-55, totally embedded Most advanced Tech of 4th & 4.5th Gen fighters tech such as F-16s, has been a partner member in design of world's most advanced and most expensive weapons program of 5th Gen fighter F-35 Stealth fighter and manufactured some of its key subsystems and parts, Turkey has lethal laser weapon systems deployed on their armored vehicles to shoot down ground or aerial targets. Ever heard of Aselsan or Roketsan??? Whole of your dharma military complex can't even stand in front of them. Even Pakistan has various deployed Solid fuel rocket Ballistic missiles the whole Shaheen series of missiles are just the tip of iceberg to mention, yes we have the biggest aircraft manufacturing complex in South Asia called Kamra Aeronautical Complex. And a lot bigger Aeronautical City is under construction. We manufacture and export planes. Yes we have our own sattelite program and sattelites too and shipbuilding and submarine building sites and manufacturing capabilities too. 
even the superpower USA, and their near peer Russia, China or technologically most advanced nations like UK, Israel, France, South Korea or Japan have never claimed about such kind of protection from their most advanced systems because that kind of guaranteed protection never existed. If you already have made your own that much capable system, then what's the point buying S-400 from Russia that would be obsolete and inferior to your already deployed system 
