Indian's beloved Tariq Fateh views on Imran Khan visit to USA

[B.K.N]

Yes. You are right. But, he also claims himself to be an Islamic scholar. I have never listened to his BS, but once I saw him, on some Indian channel, claiming such thing, in front of some Indian Muslim scholars.

Scholar of new unislamic Islam opposite to sharia law and separation of religion and state

 

[xyx007]

no worth to waste your precious time on such a useless person. I don't even bother to listen his crap.

 

[SIPRA]

Attacking his person will never be effective in countering his views, which he is entitled to express. Only a better counter-argument can work.

You are mistaken. In realpolitik, generally, both counter-attack and counter-argument are employed, sometimes separately and sometimes in tandem, depending upon the circumstances, to achieve the objectives. For example, ridiculing and mocking the opponent or enemy is a well established technique in politics as well as other world affairs.

 

[VCheng]

You are mistaken. In realpolitik, generally, both counter-attack and counter-argument are employed, sometimes separately and sometimes in tandem, depending upon the circumstances, to achieve the objectives. For example, ridiculing and mocking the opponent or enemy is a well established technique in politics as well as other world affairs.

And all of those techniques are not really effective. Only a better counter-argument can work effectively. But please don't let that stop you from using such techniques to your heart's content.

 

[B.K.N]

And all of those techniques are not really effective. Only a better counter-argument can work effectively. But please don't let that stop you from using such techniques to your heart's content.

I think most effective way to control such type of people is they don't care for counter arguments or anything because they are professional liars

 

[SIPRA]

And all of those techniques are not really effective. Only a better counter-argument can work effectively.

Sorry. Don't agree, at all. Sometimes counter-attack, in form of cliche, slogan, catchphrases etc., is far far more effective and, of course, sometimes counterargument. Depends upon the addressee, nature of issue, circumstances, resources and may be some other factors, which I am unable to fathom, right now.

But please don't let that stop you from using such techniques to your heart's content.

Thanks, Sir, for your kind concern and considerations.

 

[Flight of falcon]

Please ignore him... if he didn’t smell so bad he would be approachable ...... no one is hated more than him in Canada

 

[Taimoor Khan]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1154368621180837891

Proper cringe worthy.

 

[VCheng]

Sorry. Don't agree, at all. Sometimes counter-attack, in form of cliche, slogan, catchphrases etc., is far far more effective and, of course, sometimes counterargument. Depends upon the addressee, nature of issue, circumstances, resources and may be some other factors, which I am unable to fathom, right now.

Okay, if that is true, just how well do you think such counter-attacks have worked in countering their message? Up until PMIK's visit, things were pretty bad for Pakistan, and even after that success, things will remain bad if such messages are not countered effectively.

(Just ask many of the claimed patriots here how well their counter-attacks worked on Twitter, as an illustrative example. )

 

[Baz]

Is he like real?

na he is a twunt

 

[B.K.N]

his views,

His arguments are very strange even those who pretend to like him like him because of his anti Pakistan propaganda

 

[VCheng]

His arguments are very strange even those who pretend to like him like him because of his anti Pakistan propaganda

Strange they may be, yes, but he is entitled to express them, and the only effective way to counter them is by presenting a better argument against his views and not the person.

 

[SIPRA]

Okay, if that is true, just how well do you think such counter-attacks have worked in countering their message? Up until PMIK's visit, things were pretty bad for Pakistan, and even after that success, things will remain bad if such messages are not countered effectively.

(Just ask many of the claimed patriots here how well their counter-attacks worked on Twitter, as an illustrative example. )

You are giving a wrong example. In geopolitics and international relations, the interests of the states matter, nothing else much, including arguments and counterarguments. Answer to your question is hidden in your own post, if you care to ponder.

 

[B.K.N]

and the only effective way to counter them is by presenting a better argument against his views and not the person.

Just ignore him he wants publicity by abusing or giving counter arguments you are giving him what he wants

 

[VCheng]

You are giving a wrong example. In geopolitics and international relations, the interests of the states matter, nothing else much, including arguments and counterarguments. Answer to your question is hidden in your own post, if you care to ponder.

The example applies. Those who think that they can improve Pakistan's "soft" image by attacking those expressing different views than their own soon find out they are not being effective at all in countering opposing views. In fact, it further portrays Pakistanis in a poor light overall.

Just ignore him he wants publicity by abusing or giving counter arguments you are giving him what he wants

I am not talking just about him, and I did not post his tweet here, nor do I follow him on social media.