What's new

Indians At It, Again

lem34

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hateful Indians At It, Again

A political crisis in Pakistan. What an Indian is doing writing about it in Wall Street Journal?

AHMED QURAISHI | Monday | 16 January 2011 |

Pakistan faces a political crisis, the result of a failed democracy and fake democrats. But who is more excited about this? It is the Indians, who surface like autumn frogs at every story concerning Pakistan. They offer themselves as top experts on anything Pakistani. And their arrogant refrain is becoming laughable to everyone: 'Since we're a democracy, we can lecture Pakistan as experts.'

Today there is a political crisis of sorts in Pakistan, where a pro-US government faces collapse thanks to an angry public opinion, corruption cases in courts, and decisions by this government that amount to serious national security breaches.

You would think American news organizations would invite Pakistanis to speak about their country and explain it to the world. Not so. The purpose of most US officials, think tanks and media these days is to demonize Pakistan. So some of these anti-Pakistan Americans prefer to invite hateful Indians to do the job of explaining Pakistan to the world.

The latest frog to leap, so to speak, is Mr. Sadanand Dhume, a self-styled Pakistan expert working for American Enterprise Institute. American thinks tanks receive a lot of funding from various US government departments. They have turned anti-Pakistan a decade ago as part of a plan to paint Islamabad as the enemy, ally US with India, contain China and occupy Russia's central Asian backyard.

In fact, there is a consistent effort to put the US on a warpath with Pakistan.

In the last decade, the American academia and media has churned out more anti-Pakistan stories than India ever did. To solidify the new anti-Pakistanism in the United States and brainwash the good American people into hating one more country and people, a large number of hateful Indians have been recruited into the think tanks and media organizations.

So there is a political crisis today in Pakistan, the result of a government working on protecting the interests of a foreign country, the United States, more than the interests of Pakistan. No wonder the vast majority of Pakistanis are up in arms against this government. A key aide in this government, a former envoy to Washington, faces possible treason charges for allowing hundreds of CIA operatives into Pakistan and turning this country into another American war zone and weaken it in favor of Indian strategic interests. Go to Pakistani online forums of every stripe and color and you will hear the worst things said about the government of President Zardari.

But the hateful Indians working in the US are up in arms defending this government.

Mr. Dhume appears today in the Wall Street Journal. This is a professional business paper. But it's editors appear to have outsourced its Foreign Desk to CIA analysts, old and serving colleagues of leading independent thinkers like Bruce Riedel, for example. Tho Foreign Desk of this paper is anti-Pakistan and often acts as conduit for CIA planted stories on Pakistan, Russia, China and other countries.

Pretending to be a Pakistan expert, Mr. Dhume begins with his masterpiece today with this boring cliche:

'Who gets to decide when a democratically elected government's time is up? To the average Japanese, Indian or American, the answer is obvious: the same people who voted it into office in the first place. Not so for the average Pakistani.'

I have issue here with India's democracy, which I will explain shortly.

The Indian writer claims that an elected government in Pakistan will not complete its term because the military will topple it.

In all honesty, he is either lying or is a propagandist on an agenda.

Either Mr. Dhume lacks information and research skills, which brings into questions his positions as researcher and columnist at AEI and WSJ. Or he is outrageously lying for disinformation purposes, which simply proves he's one of those seasonal Indian frogs that leap out on every Pakistani story.

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan [HRCP] is often accused of being anti-military. I find many of their reports biased against the military and supportive of anyone working against Pakistani military, even if they are terrorist recruits into anti-Pakistan groups that enjoy refuge in US-controlled Afghanistan.

But a senior director of HRCP, Mr. I. A. Rehman, concedes in an op-ed in The News International on Sunday that Pakistani military is abiding by the law in dealing with the pro-US government of President Zardari.

Here is a quote:

'[Chief of Army Staff] General Kayani, the army chief, has given the country’s politicians a lesson in tactics. While politicians often opt for knee-jerk responses to serious matters or follow their staffers’ improvisations, the general has chosen to play by the book. He was prompt in answering the Supreme Court’s notice and thus distanced himself, in this case at least, from the politicians who are getting flak for avoiding compliance with the judiciary’s directives. He sent his statement to the Defense Ministry, as per rules. If the ministry did not follow the procedure laid down in the Rules of Business inscribed in a moth-eaten file of 1973, he cannot be blamed. That makes the PM angry at a time when he needs to be cooler than cucumber.'

This analysis is not unique. Most observers in Pakistan agree that the military has done the right thing. It has given its opinion to the government through proper channels on matters concerning national security. It refrained from destabilizing the government.

It is also a fact that, under the current Chairman Joint Chiefs, Army Chief, Air Force and Navy chiefs, the military as a whole has become apolitical more than ever.

The current crisis in Pakistan is not about 'civil-military relations' or 'civilian authority over the military' as Indian propagandists like Mr. Dhume are trying to portray.

This is a crisis about an incompetent government that has lost the trust of the people who voted for it.

Is the military trying to overthrow this government?

If anything, it is this failed democratic government that is doing everything it can to provoke the military into a coup. This government has gone as far as misleading a Chinese newspaper into publishing an interview with Zardari's prime minister attacking Pakistani military [The Chinese paper has withdrawn the interview since.] The military is trying to help this government complete its five-year term. The ruling PPPP can ensure this by removing tainted characters from its senior positions and replacing them with cleaner people. Let the tainted, corruption-ridden people face the courts without destabilizing democracy. But this is not happening because the party is firmly controlled by the tainted and corrupt.

Now I come to the Pakistan obsession of hateful Indians, like Wall Street Journal's Mr. Dhume.

India has the world's biggest concentration of poverty and disease. The world's biggest genocide against baby girls occurs in India every year. See India's Deadly Secret at India's Deadly Secret | Video - ABC News . By virtue of the size of the poor, India faces a host of other problems related to public hygiene and health. The Indian government is rich, with up to $300 billion dollars in savings. But it won't share this money with the poor. Instead, the money is being spent on militarization because Americans [such as AEI that Mr. Dhume works for] are busy convincing India it is destined to be a superpower, crush Pakistan and take on China. Despite massive arms purchases, the Indian military is yet to deliver. See Indian Military Might Is Overplayed at Indian Military Might Is Overplayed .

The quality of Indian democracy is questionable. Low-caste Hindus are raped and murdered with impunity. Girls are buried alive. All non-Hindu minorities are persecuted. Most British and American news bureaus in New Delhi hide the truth from readers back home mainly because London and Washington want to see India continue to challenge China and act as an Anglo-rented soldier in Asia. That's cheaper than sending US and UK soldiers to die in faraway lands.

All of this should have left serious academic men and women like Mr. Dhume busy for the next decade. But no. They are busy with Pakistan because they are working on an agenda.

Nowhere is that agenda clearer than on Twitter, where hordes of Indians are busy with nothing else except Pakistan. See Twitter Is Infested With Indians Campaigning Against Pakistan at The Insider: Twitter Is Infested With Indians Spreading Hate Against Pakistan .

India saw the first genocide of 21st century, in 2002, when more than 2000 Indian citizens were butchered and burned alive in a single Indian city in the course of three days. Their mistake was believing in the wrong religion. Hindu extremist mobs have also burned alive an Australian missionary and his two under-ten boys as they slept in their car. Their crime? The father and sons used to distribute clothing and food to poor Indians. This crime occurred in 2000 and extremist Hindu groups continue to operate with impunity.

In 2007, some 50 Pakistanis believed Indian claims of peace and booked seats on a 'peace train' traveling to New Delhi from Pakistan. They were burned alive midway and the attack was blamed by the Indians on Pakistani intelligence. It turned out that Hindu terrorist groups collaborated with serving Indian intelligence officers to kill the Pakistani visitors. India is yet to punish the culprits and the blood of 50 Pakistanis remains unaccountable with a pro-US government in power in Islamabad that refuses to pursue the case.

The US is turning into an exporter of extremism. Last year activists had to force Harvard University to expel an Indian politician who used his teaching course to spread hate. See Harvard Drops Indian MP Subramanian Swamy's Courses at BBC News - Harvard drops Indian MP Subramanian Swamy's courses . Why would Harvard harbor a hatemonger like that? For the same reason that Wall Street Journal invites an Indian like Dhume to explain Pakistan.

The Norwegian massacre suspect Anders Behring Breivik said last year his hate ideology was influenced by American evangelists.

Good Americans and Indians need to watch these promoters of hate and war and stop them. Mr. Sadanand Dhume can begin with getting busy with improving the lives of hundreds of millions of poor Indians instead of promoting war at his well-paid jobs at AEI and WSJ.


© 2007-2012. All rights reserved. PakNationalists.com
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium
without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
 
yes westerners are evil , pakistani liberals are fascists , indians are evil , so are afghans . Only Pakistanis are right . Yeah this line of thinking will take your country very far .

We know who our enemies are, and we know their agenda. This is not news to anyone except the Pakistani liberal extremists.

So that mitigates it does it. We got some idiots in Pakistan that excuses Indians from taking pot shots.

No point getting angry at things we can't control. Better to focus on solving Pakistan's problems. Haters gonna hate...
 
We know who our enemies are, and we know their agenda. This is not news to anyone except the Pakistani liberal extremists.



No point getting angry at things we can't control. Better to focus on solving Pakistan's problems. Haters gonna hate...

No harm in exposing them again and again to make sure all know
 
mate you seem to be quiet hateful towards us your self.:)

No Just a response to those that are hateful from India. You of all people should realise that I take people for how I find them. I accept that not all Indians are hateful to us. But a significant number are.
 
i've read the whole article..India is poor, India is this, India is that..yes sir very true, whole world knows it, but sum how we manages to project our secular and liberal image and in no way we are using terrorism as a proxy to protect our country but ur country does...
talk about political stability, we are stable..u r not
ur diplomats agreed to support WOT for few bags of dollars but now its firing back, acting against Islamic mullas and insurgents is same as acting against ur own countrymen.
it depends upon ur perception and understanding, anything against Pakistan is western+ Indian propaganda but hell yeah..u cant deny the fact that all is true.
 
Pakistan points gun at its own head

SADANAND DHUME The Wall Street Journal January 17, 2012 12:00AM
WHO gets to decide when a democratically elected government's time is up? To the average Japanese, Indian or American, the answer is obvious: the same people who voted it into office in the first place. Not so for the average Pakistani.

In the country's 64-year history, power has never changed hands purely by the ballot. The army, working alone or in tandem with sympathetic civilians, hasn't let any elected leader finish his term, thanks to which democracy has failed to seep into the country's foundations.

Now, if a loose grouping of generals, judges and opposition politicians gets its way, this sorry pattern could repeat itself.

At stake is the fate of the nearly four-year-old Pakistan Peoples Party government headed by President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani. Although the government enjoys a majority in parliament, outside powerful forces have coalesced against it. The Supreme Court is aggressively pursuing corruption charges against Zardari. The government has called for a vote of confidence in parliament, most likely to shore up political support.
The full digital experience

This recent spike in instability began late last year as the Supreme Court began investigating the so -called "memogate" scandal. This involves a secret letter delivered to the US's then chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, shortly after the US raid that killed Osama bin Laden last May.

Husain Haqqani, Pakistan's former ambassador to the US, is accused of secretly proposing to dilute army control of national security in return for American help in warding off a coup.

Haqqani denies any involvement in the memo affair. Events seemed to snowball into a crisis last week when the army publicly warned the government of "serious ramifications with potentially grievous consequences", after Gilani told China's People's Daily Online that the army leadership had acted unconstitutionally by making submissions to the court's memogate inquiry without government approval.

Meanwhile, cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan, widely believed to have the tacit backing of the generals, warned the government of a "tsunami march" of protesters should it disregard a Supreme Court decision that could, among other possibilities, dismiss Zardari.

To be sure, many Pakistanis have good reason to wish to see the back of their unpopular president. Some regard Zardari as the undeserving beneficiary of a sympathy vote in 2008 following the assassination of his wife, former prime minister Benazir Bhutto.

Zardari has never shaken a reputation for sticky fingers. When his wife was in power he was dubbed "10 per cent", although he denies any wrongdoing. Perhaps the defining image of Zardari's presidency was a 2010 visit to his chateau in France while floods deluged Pakistan. Neither Zardari nor Gilani will win any awards for good governance.

As for the memogate scandal, the accusation that the government was willing to barter away national sovereignty to cling to power has further wounded the President. Although the charges are unproven and some question the credibility of the chief accuser, Pakistani-American businessman Mansoor Ijaz, many believe that Haqqani is guilty-and, by extension, Zardari as well.

Yet, whatever their frustrations, Pakistanis need to be wary of a cure that's worse than the disease. Simply put, the costs to the country of yet another government turfed out prematurely - whether by the courts or by the military - far outweigh any benefits. How can democracy be expected to take root when undemocratic forces yank it out of the ground every few years?

Pakistanis must also understand that none of the main protagonists in this drama can credibly claim to be placing national interests over parochial ones. The Supreme Court has gone out of its way to target Zardari and Haqqani while ignoring older cases.

Don't hold your breath for the court to investigate the role of the army's Inter-Services Intelligence agency in influencing national elections, or claims that the ISI canvassed Middle Eastern countries to support a coup last summer. And then there's the mystery of why the world's most wanted terrorist was comfortably ensconced a stone's throw from Pakistan's premier military academy.

The army has perfected the art of dressing up self-interest as patriotism. In most democratic countries, army chief General Ashfaq Kayani and spymaster General Ahmad Shuja Pasha would have been sacked for incompetence or insubordination.

No institution has done more to dilute Pakistan's sovereignty, tarnish its reputation by backing terrorism, or slow down development by devouring the lion's share of the national budget. In that sense, Kayani and Pasha follow a long tradition of Pakistani military officers better at political intrigue than at fighting enemies abroad or terrorists within.

Pakistan once again finds itself at a crossroads where it can choose between strengthening democracy and perpetuating the malign influence of a politicised army. At this point, those baying for Zardari's blood ought to remember one simple fact: that the democratic process is more important than a single individual.

If the current government is allowed to complete its term, and elections are held on schedule in 2013, the country will pass an important milestone on the road to genuine democracy. If not, we have to expect even more turmoil from what is already dubbed the most dangerous place on earth.

Sadanand Dhume is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute
 
you know the best way to spread malicious propaganda is to be very very subtle so that people believe in the 'neutral' perspective that you are trying to masquerade your true intent as...
ahmed qureshi seems to be more on RAW payroll than of ISI's...
 
I think our Indian friends here didn't really understand what the article was about.
It is not about how evil India is or how poor it is.
The article was about how unfair and biased western media is towards Pakistan.
Instead of bringing on Pakistanis to present their point of view, they bring on opportunistic Indians, who naturally, paint Pakistan as Mordor from Lord of the Rings.

If the reverse were true and only Pakistanis were invited to discuss the situation in India, don't you think that that would be unfair?
 
I think our Indian friends here didn't really understand what the article was about.
It is not about how evil India is or how poor it is.
The article was about how unfair and biased western media is towards Pakistan.
Instead of bringing on Pakistanis to present their point of view, they bring on opportunistic Indians, who naturally, paint Pakistan as Mordor from Lord of the Rings.

If the reverse were true and only Pakistanis were invited to discuss the situation in India, don't you think that that would be unfair?
What can a Pakistani tell about India that the World does not already know about ? About poverty, lack of sanitation, malnutrition, its caste system or about Kashmir or about Maoists ? India is an open book, well discussed, debated and criticized even in India by people like William Dalrymple, or the mother-lode of India's other side, Arundhati Roy. But, the bottom line is this : India has never indulged in terrorist activities outside its zone nor has been a terrorist haven. Also, India is an established democratic state, though broken and chaotic, yet tries to learn from it and improves upon it. And the world recognizes the merit behind that. So the grouse that the world holds for Pakistan is very much valid, since its Pakistan's shortcomings that not only affects the immediate sphere of influence, but the world over.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom