What's new

Indians Also Beheaded Pakistani Soldiers

There is a difference between sliting throat and beheading then taking the head back and as the intercepts show they were congratulating and celebrating the beheading. Thats what is frustrating.

Did you read what barkha dutt saw in OP?-
 
That's what I keep saying.. its not like they had to do an investigation to see if the head was attached or not..
seems like the "beheaded" STORY stuck after it was bounced around.. and found to be good for propaganda.

The mother of the slained soldier wont go for hunger strike for IAs propaganda uh?
 
I second what KS has said ...i myself has heard from this tamil soldier who fought in kargil...he described gruesome acts done to pakistani soldiers by the indian army ...very gruesome to even describe those things.
 
I doubt that there is an issue to begin with because the Spokesperson for the Regional Command confirmed to Reuters two days before Bikram Singh's interview that none of the soldiers had been beheaded.

Is there a link for that ?
 
The mother of the slained soldier wont go for hunger strike for IAs propaganda uh?

She could, after all.. she received the body from IA..
Im not a 100% behind this theory. just 50/50..

You will believe what you get told..

When you accuse Pakistanis of believing the lies said about the 65 war.. you should expect the same from only a slightly different gene pool
 
The mother of the slained soldier wont go for hunger strike for IAs propaganda uh?

Brother of slained soldier cast his doubts weather it was his body that IA gave to them
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom