Maira La
SENIOR MEMBER

- Joined
- Mar 5, 2010
- Messages
- 4,897
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
I think we should make a distinction between these two terms. They cannot be used to refer to the same people.
The term British Indian is a White man assigned identity, much like American Indian. Whereas British Indian refers to natives of Ganges-Dravidian lands, American Indian refers to natives of the Americas.
The term Indian is the historical identity of people living along the Indus, especially in South-Eastern Pakistan.
Though these two terms are not interchangeable, most of the world has confused British Indians for Indians. Citizens of the Republic of India (British India) itself have deluded themselves to the extent that a man from Orissa, Jharkhand or Karnataka would believe he descends from ancient Punjabi warriors like Porus and not the natives of their own land.
It is understandable that British Indians would not want to identify as British Indian. After all it's a colonial identity. However the formation of British India itself is a result of colonial activities, so there is no escaping that identity. If they want an older identity maybe they could call themselves Mughaldeshis? Would like to hear some opinions of resident British Indians.
The term British Indian is a White man assigned identity, much like American Indian. Whereas British Indian refers to natives of Ganges-Dravidian lands, American Indian refers to natives of the Americas.
The term Indian is the historical identity of people living along the Indus, especially in South-Eastern Pakistan.
Though these two terms are not interchangeable, most of the world has confused British Indians for Indians. Citizens of the Republic of India (British India) itself have deluded themselves to the extent that a man from Orissa, Jharkhand or Karnataka would believe he descends from ancient Punjabi warriors like Porus and not the natives of their own land.
It is understandable that British Indians would not want to identify as British Indian. After all it's a colonial identity. However the formation of British India itself is a result of colonial activities, so there is no escaping that identity. If they want an older identity maybe they could call themselves Mughaldeshis? Would like to hear some opinions of resident British Indians.