Its got less to do with free hand. The problem was that under the previous dispensation, the mantra was 'calibrated response' and 'proportionate response'. The problem occurred in implementation phase, wherein the local commanders hesitated over what 'calibrated response' and 'proportionate response' meant. Majority decided not to take a risk. However, at no time did any Indian government muzzle the army's response on LC. Directives were clear - respond. But it was limited to like calibre of provocation.
With the present dispensation, it has become 'overwhelming response'. This allows the freedom to upgrade the response. However, the army still gives a calibrated response, as an over aggressive response in a sector may invite retaliation in a sector where we may be at a disadvantage in terms of topography/alignment/tactical location.
