What's new

Indian Sikhs protest at Pakistan’s diplomatic mission

.
You ruled? I thought they were Turkish? Now you are Turkish? Please you just converted to their religion out of your convenience or it was forced up on you. Either way, that doesn't make you them.
Only thing forced was Indian men forcing themselves on Indian women... I think that's called rape :rolleyes:
 
.
You ruled? I thought they were Turkish? Now you are Turkish? Please you just converted to their religion out of your convenience or it was forced up on you. Either way, that doesn't make you them.
Turkish means Muslims meaning US, and why you think every Muslim are in Subcontinent were forcefully converted this logic has no base why you don't think most of Muslim in the Subcontinent happily/unforcefully converted to Islam, And my ancestor (i am talking specifically for my family) migrated from Suadia and we are a direct decedent of our 3rd Calipah HAZART USMAN (R,A), and forcefully theory has no base but just ridiculous theory
 
. .
I thought Sikhs love Pakistan? That's the impression I got from PDF

lol so now Sikhs will decide about Pakistan based on a feud of one man.

You ruled? I thought they were Turkish? Now you are Turkish?

dumb chap, Turkish doesnt mean Antalya(Turkey) , it implies Turkic people of Central Asia. Geography of Pakistan is on the borderline of Central Asia and South Asia. Due to proximity People of Pakistan have genetic ,cultural,linguistic and religious overlap with Central Asian people who invaded subcontinent.
 
Last edited:
.
Turkic people of central Asia are not you. Lol. Just because you adopted the invaders religion and culture doesn't make you the invader. You are just an unfortunate casualty of the region's history. That's all. But obviously you can't say that to yourself and diminish in your own eyes. So I'll let you believe what you want. Take care.
Don't derail the thread yoou RSS fascist troll its not for this useless debate
 
. .
Sure you migrated. lol. Let's say for others they adopted the invaders religion and culture. Does that make you the invader? That's some logic I can't understand. Tomorrow I convert to christianity, can I claim heritage of Julia's caesar?
Don't troll, and i am not claiming that i am migrated from Me but my ancestor did, you troll, we have record/lineage in our family that our ancestor was direct decedent with our Calipah, same as many hindus calims that they are the decedent some ancient Hindu kings/queens, you're reported for you trolling/rants

RSS fascist troll? Come on, get creative. Lol.
Reported for trolling
 
.
Don't troll, and i am not claiming that i am migrated from Me but my ancestor did, you troll, we have record/lineage in our family that our ancestor was direct decedent with our Calipah, same as many hindus calims that they are the decedent some ancient Hindu kings/queens, you're reported for you trolling/rants
Was I abusing you somehow?
 
.
Sure you migrated. Lol. So you are not native? Whats the logic in claiming Porus as yours? Obviously you migrated later.

Let's say for others they adopted the invaders religion and culture. Does that make you them invader? That's some logic I can't understand. Tomorrow I convert to Christianity, can I claim heritage of the British?
get lost you troll we are not claims that porus was ours but land was currently Pakistan, and stop your nonsense i already explain it

Was I abusing you somehow?
No i am try to correct your falsehood, you troll
 
.
get lost you troll we are not claims that porus was ours but land was currently Pakistan, and stop your nonsense i already explain it


No i am try to correct your falsehood, you troll

History is about people and their culture. Not land. When you are identifying with Arabs, Turkish and Persian just because you have today a same religion/culture, then it's my prerogative to adopt Porus or any other Hindu king as ours because he belonged to the same Hindu/Indian culture.
 
.
Turkic people of central Asia are not you. Lol. Just because you adopted the invaders religion and culture doesn't make you the invader. You are just an unfortunate casualty of the region's history. That's all. But obviously you can't say that to yourself and diminish in your own eyes. So I'll let you believe what you want. Take care.

Central Asians were not muslim at one point, yet they have been migrating to the rivers of present day Pakistan for thousands of years, even before the Indus valley civilization was there.. way before the invaders from the same lot stepped into Delhi, so there you go ,the invaders were not Alien to us.

Once a Turk here told me Pakistanis are Turkic people who have lost their Turk heritage/language.He is partially correct, we have retained that heritage to some extent and people pf Kashmir and Potohar actually have Turkish roots as well.however since Pakistan is a very diverse country we never chose Turk as our identity.All the Arab loan words and many persian words in Urdu came from Turkic language.Being Turk has got little to do with Turk blood and more with the heritage and language otherwise GokTurks would be the only real Turks that actually existed.
 
.
Central Asians were not muslim at one point, yet they have been migrating to the rivers of present day Pakistan for thousands of years, even before the Indus valley civilization was there.. way before the invaders from the same lot stepped into Delhi, so there you go ,the invaders were not Alien to us.

Once a Turk here told me Pakistanis are Turkic people who have lost their Turk heritage/language.He is partially correct, we have retained that heritage to some extent and people pf Kashmir and Potohar actually have Turkish roots as well.however since Pakistan is a very diverse country we never chose Turk as our identity.All the Arab loan words and many persian words in Urdu came from Turkic language.Being Turk has got little to do with Turk blood and more with the heritage and language otherwise GokTurks would be the only real Turks that actually existed.

So per your logic, a converted Christian during British time can claim to have ruled us for 300 years. Just because he adopted his invaders religion/culture. Okay, good to know.

@seven0seven was claiming Saudi heritage. You say Turkic heritage. Someone else will say they have Egyptian heritage. None of you have South Asian heritage. Lol.
 
.
So per your logic, a converted Christian during British time can claim to have ruled us for 300 years. Just because he adopted his invaders religion/culture. Okay, good to know.

@seven0seven was claiming Saudi heritage. You say Turkic heritage. Someone else will say they have Egyptian heritage. None of you have South Asian heritage. Lol.

lol your thick head cant consume this..because you are deluded by your gangu mindset.
The British landed in India in Surat on August 24, 1608.
The Central Asians have been living right next door us for thousands of years..
Its got nothing to do with religion.
 
.
lol your thick head cant consume this..because you are deluded by your gangu mindset.
The British landed in India in Surat on August 24, 1608.
The Central Asians have been living right next door us for thousands of years..
Its got nothing to do with religion.
So dumb head, you are telling me all Pakistanis are central Asian descents. Lol.

And land that is Pakistan today was a Hindu/Dharmic land right for a millennium before the central Asian invaders raided the country. Culture there was Hindu culture.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom