What's new

Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

You are confusing me.
If mahabharta mentions Saraswati as non flowing river, and rig Veda mentions otherwise, then how can mahabharta be written before Rigveda???

Was that the argument? I thought you were suggesting the reverse with the post that quoted. I guess I might have got your perspective wrong, I was pointing that there was no doubt that the Rg veda was older.
 
Your narrow-minded conclusions and hate for anything Hindu gives the general impression of a Bengali Muslim.

If you are not one, all you need to do is Full Disclosure and say you are a Hindu in clear terms. You have refused to do that under some false impression that by disclosing your religion you are somehow damaging "secularism" :lol:

This aversion to Transparency is what highlights your lack of integrity, especially when you are discussing Hindutva.

Its sad that you think that somehow makes you "special" and object of our affection ....... there are a few others like you who use such posts to "play the Martyr". Another fact that identifies you as a "secular" folk a.k.a Aadarsh Liberal.

Your bigoted conclusion about anyone who shows narrow mildness and hatred has to be a Muslim aside, neither have I discussed Hinduvta with you nor do I intend to. One does not have to declare his religion and every other personal detail everytime he or she make a post in online forum. That was how nazi Germany operated when they made Jews to declare their religion publicly for everyone to see, or recently some 'fringe element' in Bhopal who were checking people's id before they can join the Garba. I didn't get the memo that we do the same here as well!

Its sad that you think that somehow makes you "special" and object of our affection ....... there are a few others like you who use such posts to "play the Martyr". Another fact that identifies you as a "secular" folk a.k.a Aadarsh Liberal.

Don't who are these few others like me, but none can top you guys with your 24*7 randi rona about Hinduism in danger and selective outrage of msm. Or maybe I'm wrong, jamati types in BD and Pakistan can give you a fair competition at incessant whine of victim hood.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


That is the question people gonna ask in next election.


Why did people vote for BJP in 2014 then?


Anyway time for me to say goodnight. This was my post which put all the panties in twist! All I did was to ask - Why did people vote for BJP in 2014? :lol: :lol:

I put some smiley to make sure people don't feel I'm feeling victim here. I'm not, it was entertaining. Almost as entertaining as Pankaj Nihalini's song about Modi kaka. People cool your bottom by watching Modi kaka's various achievement like F14 tomcat, expressway in dubai, international space shuttle, Russian high risesetc, and remember if this guy is censor board chief - you are not doing sycophancy well!! Har har Modi!

 
Your bigoted conclusion about anyone who shows narrow mildness and hatred has to be a Muslim aside, neither have I discussed Hinduvta with you nor do I intend to. One does not have to declare his religion and every other personal detail everytime he or she make a post in online forum. That was how nazi Germany operated when they made Jews to declare their religion publicly for everyone to see, or recently some 'fringe element' in Bhopal who were checking people's id before they can join the Garba. I didn't get the memo that we do the same here as well!

LOL.... There you go demonstrating classic bigotry and hate by paraphrasing my words to claim "ANYONE who shows hate HAS to be a muslim".

Nowhere did I claim that, but your dishonest nature just managed to highlight what I had said about you a second earlier. Let me repeat it. Your narrow-minded conclusions is what helps others identify your true nature.

A liar and a hypocrite.

ANY discussion on BJP or RSS is a discussion on Hindutva. You intellectual DISHONESTY do not even let you acknowledge this fundamental reality.

Another example of Your narrow-minded conclusions. That "No one has to declare his religion when they make ANY post online". What I had said was one needs to disclose his religion when one is discussing Hindutva.

Then come your VICTIM roleplay and desperate Attempt at dragging in Godwin Laws.

You said "That was how nazi Germany operated when they made Jews to declare their religion publicly for everyone to see,"

When one drags in "Godwins Law" then it is established that he lost the debate but only a intellectually HONEST person will acknowledge this Fact.

Your HATE for anything Hindu is demonstrated by how you manage to link the holy Garba with "intolerance". Garba is a Hindu religious Celebration, not a social gathering to pick up Girls.

Its amazing how you are so full of HUBRIS that you go on to exhibit the Very same Characteristics immediately after I said you show such sickening characteristics. :lol:

Don't who are these few others like me, but none can top you guys with your 24*7 randi rona about Hinduism in danger and selective outrage of msm. Or me I'm wrong jamati types in BD and Pakistan can give you a fair competition at incessant whine victim hood.

I am glad you are aware of randi rona due to your family history but danger to Hinduism is evidenced by dilution of Hindu Rashtra character by IG in 1976 by inserting "secular" into the constitution and by Statistical Evidence that show Hindu population decreasing in India from 1947 till date and the growth of Muslim and Christan population in India.

Not to mention the Socking plight of Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Only a pervert and Hypocrite will turn a blind eye to Statistical Evidence and claim its a Myth and "all is well". ........ and we all know what you are. Thank you for helping me expose it. :tup:
 
1447656571595.jpg


Vallah ye kya hen :confused:
 
Not mine.
It was @It.is.all.mudi's.fault argument. :)



Yes, that's what I think too.


No, I was stating exactly what Bangalore is saying. Since characters of Mahabharat trace their lineage to Rig-Vedic characters, Mahabharata could not be older than Rig Veda. (and a 9000 Year old Mahabharata would pre-date Rig-Veda in its oldest estimated date by a large margin)


And I provided you link to that Historum thread as it contained proofs for a lot of discoveries. Threads on that forum usually act as repositories of arguments and proofs, hence I usually quote whole threads without bothering about posting individual proofs.
 
No, I was stating exactly what Bangalore is saying. Since characters of Mahabharat trace their lineage to Rig-Vedic characters, Mahabharata could not be older than Rig Veda. (and a 9000 Year old Mahabharata would pre-date Rig-Veda in its oldest estimated date by a large margin)


And I provided you link to that Historum thread as it contained proofs for a lot of discoveries. Threads on that forum usually act as repositories of arguments and proofs, hence I usually quote whole threads without bothering about posting individual proofs.
We were talking about Shri Ram's DOB and Ramayana.

Going by the timeline Ramayana came before mahabharta, RigVeda happened somewhere in between. So what's the confusion??

Lol
Where did you find this?
 
Let me count the instances of 'Prime Minister of India' -baiting :D
Lol, what's with all the passive-aggressiveness? Just asked a simple question, didn't even dare to to mildly criticise god ji!!
1
(ignore the various foreign achievements which are used to praise modii kaka, merely semantics!)
2

Almost as entertaining as Pankaj Nihalini's song about Modi kaka. People cool your bottom by watching Modi kaka's various achievement like F14 tomcat, expressway in dubai, international space shuttle
3

Har har Modi!
4

Congratulations. :tup: Good achievement. :enjoy: Even seasoned jihadis will not go to this extent of insulting the head of the Government of India.

Liberals should take on islamic terrorism, as well as all other form of terrorism, head on, before it gets hijacked by right wing.
Please. You are no liberal. You are not a secular either. Don't hijack the liberal plank here. You are simply an Islamic apologist. Why are you trying to pose yourself as a liberal? You don't hold any of the liberal values dear. You don't have the basic decency of giving importance to other points of view. Your stance over the previous incidences are clear. People are not as ignorant as they were 20 years back. Now they see your views in the open and are capable enough to judge what is good for them and what is not. The time for Big Joes to dictate what's in their best interests is gone. You have not taken on Islamic terrorism, nor have you ever mentioned it without mentioning 'other' terrorism. Here as well, you have done the same. We don't expect you to do that either. Just stick to what you do best - be a self appointed apologist for radical Islam. :tup: And your personal faith does not interest me. Claim that sentimental victimhood from other members. :)

I think we should go beyond labelling people! I accept that I too put label on people in past, but seldom do it now.
'Seldom do it now'? :what: :hitwall:
Yeah, you previously abused regular communal Hindu mortals. Now you abuse the PM himself. :tup: And your point is some C grade song someone released. :enjoy:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom