What's new

Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

Muslim outfit trains guns at statues - NATIONAL - The Hindu

Statues have been the focal point of expressing human emotions in the country by different social and religious groups but they are repeatedly being turned into controversies by different groups. A little known organisation, Awami Majlis-e-Amal in the city has now threatened to remove six statues of Muslim personalities, including former President APJ Abdul Kalam and sixth Nizam Mir Mahboob Ali Khan, that are installed at various places citing religious beliefs.

“Our religion forbids installing statues and we have communicated this to successive governments asking them to remove them. We do not distinguish between personalities and will not hesitate to break and throw them into Tank Bund if the authorities do not take them out,” Mujahed Hashmi, general secretary, Awami Majlis-e-Amal Telangana, said.

There are six statues of Muslim personalities at different places in Telangana, the oldest among them is the bronze statue of Mir Yousuf Ali Khan popular known as Salar Jung III which is installed at Salar Jung Museum.

Three other statues — Qutb Shahi ruler Abdul Hasan Tana Shah, popularly known as Tanashah; well known poet, Maqdoom Mohiuddin and sixth Nizam Mahboob Ali Khan — are installed at Tank Bund.

The organisation also wanted the statue of Kalam which was recently unveiled at a defence institution – Research Centre Imarat and the one of Nawab Ali Nawaz Jung, which was installed last year on the Jala Soudha office premises removed immediately.

“By installing statues, the government cannot please Muslims. It should name educational institutions and hospitals after them if it has respect for them,” Md. Amanullah Khan, president of the organisation, said. He said a massive movement would be launched if the statues are not removed before the local municipal elections.

Telangana Dy. CM

stands firm

Maulana Haseeb-ul-Hassan, general secretary, Sunni-Ulema- Board Hyderabad, explained that, “Islam prohibits putting up statues and displaying photos or paintings of people. Idol worship is also forbidden in the religion.”

Telangana Deputy Chief Minister, Mohammed Mahmood Ali however said that the statues were installed by successive governments owing to public demand.

“The government cannot go by religious beliefs of any particular community. We are installing statues of people to recognise their contribution to society irrespective of their caste or religion. Even in Islamic countries you find statues of Muslim personalities, so what is wrong in having in the city,” Mr. Mahmood said.
 
Today I was stuck in rain in a halwai's shop. I had my single common Bihari finally. I obviously asked him about elections. He said BJP had more chances. He says, if the present govt was good, why would people like him have to leave Bihar and come to places in south for their livelihood.

So my 1 person non voting sample says BJP will win Bihar. :pop:
 
Muslim outfit trains guns at statues - NATIONAL - The Hindu

Statues have been the focal point of expressing human emotions in the country by different social and religious groups but they are repeatedly being turned into controversies by different groups. A little known organisation, Awami Majlis-e-Amal in the city has now threatened to remove six statues of Muslim personalities, including former President APJ Abdul Kalam and sixth Nizam Mir Mahboob Ali Khan, that are installed at various places citing religious beliefs.

“Our religion forbids installing statues and we have communicated this to successive governments asking them to remove them. We do not distinguish between personalities and will not hesitate to break and throw them into Tank Bund if the authorities do not take them out,” Mujahed Hashmi, general secretary, Awami Majlis-e-Amal Telangana, said.

There are six statues of Muslim personalities at different places in Telangana, the oldest among them is the bronze statue of Mir Yousuf Ali Khan popular known as Salar Jung III which is installed at Salar Jung Museum.

Three other statues — Qutb Shahi ruler Abdul Hasan Tana Shah, popularly known as Tanashah; well known poet, Maqdoom Mohiuddin and sixth Nizam Mahboob Ali Khan — are installed at Tank Bund.

The organisation also wanted the statue of Kalam which was recently unveiled at a defence institution – Research Centre Imarat and the one of Nawab Ali Nawaz Jung, which was installed last year on the Jala Soudha office premises removed immediately.

“By installing statues, the government cannot please Muslims. It should name educational institutions and hospitals after them if it has respect for them,” Md. Amanullah Khan, president of the organisation, said. He said a massive movement would be launched if the statues are not removed before the local municipal elections.

Telangana Dy. CM

stands firm

Maulana Haseeb-ul-Hassan, general secretary, Sunni-Ulema- Board Hyderabad, explained that, “Islam prohibits putting up statues and displaying photos or paintings of people. Idol worship is also forbidden in the religion.”

Telangana Deputy Chief Minister, Mohammed Mahmood Ali however said that the statues were installed by successive governments owing to public demand.

“The government cannot go by religious beliefs of any particular community. We are installing statues of people to recognise their contribution to society irrespective of their caste or religion. Even in Islamic countries you find statues of Muslim personalities, so what is wrong in having in the city,” Mr. Mahmood said.

:hitwall::hitwall:
 

CSz4_BaUEAA9hHk.png:small
 


It is sad to see him going so openly against BJP, though his disgruntlement is justified as he has been systematically marginalized only because Jaitely saw him as his competitor (one could even argue that on basis of past and qualifications,he would have become a better FM). If Jaitely ,who is a non performer, was ever to be replaced, he was a logical choice, thus a threat to him.

Left feared him more than 500 Sanghis ,who would rant, rail, indulge in breast beating, and drown leftists under weight of their collective voice for sometime, but like defender of any impregnable fort, leftists would finally prevail and emerge victorious by peddling pseudo-logical false narrative which sanghis could not counter in real time as by the time Sanghis would cross check the mountain of misquotations, slective quotations, and fabricated evidence, leftist narrative would have entrenched itself.


He attacked the very source of legitimacy of leftists, and exposed them for what they are, at a time when no right winger could even comprehended as to what has hit them when leftists come up with ridiculous theories ,and a crap load of fabrications, like on Ayodhya and secular media ran with leftist narratives. His "eminent historian" series books ,even today, form the intellectual bedrock of explaining how marxists captured power in most universities of India.
 

The more I look into it, the more I am convinced. Here in Mumbai, many right wingers are now suspecting that it was a SS/BJP ploy to wipe out Congressi/ seculars and see the results.... SS+BJP=94/122 seats :oops::lol:

BTW, just think about it..... even with so much drama (even before Maha electipon in 2014 when SS said will walk out of NDA) SS and BJP are still in the government at Delhi as well as Mumbai. :partay:

Whatever you say, Maharashtra is surely India's right wing bastion as of date :devil:

@SarthakGanguly @magudi @Marxist
 
Looks like AAP is more worried about who gets the credit for raising the 1984 anti Sikh riots issue, rather than seeing the victims get justice. That's one less brownie point for the AAP in the coming Punjab elections :( . So much for their sanctimonious bullshyte of not being like every other political party.

Where was this argument when the BJP and Modi was being and is still hounded for the 2002 Gujarat riots?



Several Gujarat Congress leaders were involved in 2002 riots: Madani


Yes this is true. My friend tell me a story of a billionaire of Barod who was a congress leader. he used to give bails to Muslims involved in riots and used to supply weapons to Hindus to attack Muslims. Riot ended and he got congress ticket. Mr madmi is absolutely right.
 
Looks like AAP is more worried about who gets the credit for raising the 1984 anti Sikh riots issue, rather than seeing the victims get justice. That's one less brownie point for the AAP in the coming Punjab elections :( . So much for their sanctimonious bullshyte of not being like every other political party.
Where was this argument when the BJP and Modi was being and is still hounded for the 2002 Gujarat riots?
All those facts in this news cutting are based recommendations of Jain-Aggarwal commitee. AAP has nothing to do with those 14 FIRs against 49 BJP-RSS bhakts. Why so much desperation ?:lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom