What's new

Indian Nukes: World’s largest unsafe-unguarded programme, reveals Research Study

Missed the catch.....under mysterious circumstances. !!!
Actually if you go through the press release, 7 were suicides(a suicide rate of only 15/100,000), 3 accidents(1 a car accident due to drunk & 2 due to fire during experiments by trainees).
Only 1 is mysterious.
 
.
Indian Nukes: World’s largest unsafe-unguarded programme, reveals Research Study
Posted By: News Deskon: October 23, 2016
567040d5c46188d02d8b45b3.jpg

Share0
Tweet
Share0
Share0


ISLAMABAD Oct 23 (APP): New ground breaking research carried out by nuclear experts has disclosed that India can produce a maximum of 356 to 492 nuclear weapons, proving that the actual Indian nuclear bomb making capacity is far greater than most current western assessments.

This is the crux of the research carried out by four nuclear researchers in a book “Indian Unsafe-guarded Nuclear Program” co-authored by Adeela Azam, Ahmad Khan, Syed Muhammad Ali and Sameer Ali Khan.

“The research study reveals that India has sufficient material and technical capacity to make up to 356 to 492 nuclear bombs. This work is in contrast to various other earlier studies which have taken a much more modest view of the Indian nuclear bomb making potential,” said the authors, interacting with this scribe while divulging details about their startling study.

The findings of the study also provide food for thought to the member States of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) that they must consider the large and swiftly expanding Indian nuclear bomb making capacity while dealing with New Delhi’s NSG membership case and ensure that the Indian membership of this export control arrangement does not, in any way, help India further expand and accelerate its nuclear weapons program.

The book published by the Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad (ISSI), dilates in threadbare upon the topics like, “Indian Nuclear Energy Needs and Uranium Reserves, Indian Uranium Enrichment Capacity and Future Requirement, Indian Unsafe-guarded Nuclear Reactor Program and Indian Nuclear Reprocessing Program.”

Findings of this book are based on the critical review of hundreds of Indian documents, research studies, budgetary estimates, technical assessments, statements and research by senior Indian nuclear scientists and credible research of leading international nuclear experts, spanning more than six decades.

It also unveils the true size, extent and capabilities of the different aspects of the complex Indian nuclear program, which New Delhi has kept outside the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards and proves that it is the largest and oldest unsafe-guarded nuclear program in the entire developing world and among all the States not party to the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty.

Adeela Azam, Visiting Fellow ISSI, has argued that India’s own mines have sufficient uranium reserves and capacity to run New Delhi’s existing reactors for more than a century. India has produced nuclear fuel beyond the current requirements of its Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors.

Ahmad Khan, Visiting Fellow ISSI, is of the view that India, despite starting its uranium enrichment program much later than Pakistan, has overtaken Islamabad in terms of its total known uranium enrichment capacity.

“Although the world’s spotlight continues to be on the Iranian nuclear program, in reality the Indian uranium enrichment program is perhaps the fastest growing in the World and provides New Delhi with ample Uranium enrichment capacity to not only run nuclear powered ballistic missile submarines but also to build nuclear and thermonuclear weapons,” he said.

Syed Muhammad Ali, Senior Research Fellow Center for International Strategic Studies, offers a new assessment of how many nuclear bombs India can actually make, based on the removal of weapon-grade and reactor-grade plutonium from its nuclear reactors, kept outside IAEA safeguards. Based on its current unsafe-guarded nuclear reactor capacity,

India can make up to 492 plutonium-based nuclear weapons.

“India acquired its nuclear bomb making capacity almost two decades before Pakistan, has consistently enlarged it, making New Delhi’s estimated stocks of weapon-useable nuclear materials, the largest in the entire developing world and the Non-NPT states,” he added.

Sameer Ali Khan, Visiting Fellow ISSI, extensive research on Indian reprocessing facilities reveals that New Delh’s large reactor-grade plutonium stockpile is weapon-useable and it has kept almost its entire known reprocessing capacity outside IAEA safeguards, which is available for military use.

In addition, India is keeping its Fast Breeder reactor program outside the IAEA safeguard for potential military use. Operating at 80% of their known capacities, Indian reprocessing plants could have separated more than one ton of weapon-grade plutonium, sufficient for approximately 96 to 294 nuclear warheads. Moreover, India might have separated over 9 to 12 tons of additional reactor grade plutonium, Sameer said.

Alternatively, assuming a more conservative efficiency of the Indian reprocessing plants of 50% capacity, New Delhi could have separated over 700 kgs of weapon-grade plutonium, sufficient for building 126 to 189 nuclear weapons besides separating over 5 to 7 tons of reactor-grade plutonium, he said.

This additional 5 to 12 tons stock of reactor-grade plutonium is potentially weapon usable and, if not used in Fast Breeder Reactors, could support an additional arsenal of 833 to 3000 reactor grade plutonium based nuclear weapons besides those based on weapons grade plutonium. Even if this unsafe-guarded reactor grade plutonium stocks are used to fuel Indian Fast Breeder Reactors, the ultimate output (weapons grade plutonium) will find

its only utility in nuclear weapons. This estimate does not mean that the estimates presented in earlier chapters are inconsistent with these estimates or incorrect.

The difference in these estimates is because each chapter has looked at the capacities of Indian nuclear facilities rather than actual production, he added.
@Zibago @Zain Malik @Horus @Side-Winder @Oscar @Sarge @Areesh @Windjammer

The book published by the Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad (ISSI), dilates in threadbare upon the topics like, “Indian Nuclear Energy Needs and Uranium Reserves, Indian Uranium Enrichment Capacity and Future Requirement, Indian Unsafe-guarded Nuclear Reactor Program and Indian Nuclear Reprocessing Program.”

Yeah very credible research :wave:
 
.
What i know is that India is unable to deal with plutonium and can only make nukes with uranium my physics professor told me about two dys ago.

Pakistan uses plutonium.

Plutonium nuclear bombs are not much that capable as uranium nuclear bombs my Physics professor toldmme about two days ago.

Pakistan uses uranium while India uses plutonium. Also uranium is expensive and not much abundant.
WlVRvT5.jpg
 
.
What i know is that India is unable to deal with plutonium and can only make nukes with uranium my physics professor told me about two dys ago.

Pakistan uses plutonium.

Plutonium nuclear bombs are not much that capable as uranium nuclear bombs my Physics professor toldmme about two days ago.

Pakistan uses uranium while India uses plutonium. Also uranium is expensive and not much abundant.

Ya to tera professor Chu**** hai, ya tujhe bana raha hai.

Btw, I hope they are teaching you something besides Nuclear bombs in Physics class in Pakistan.
 
.
What i know is that India is unable to deal with plutonium and can only make nukes with uranium my physics professor told me about two dys ago.

Pakistan uses plutonium.

Plutonium nuclear bombs are not much that capable as uranium nuclear bombs my Physics professor toldmme about two days ago.

Pakistan uses uranium while India uses plutonium. Also uranium is expensive and not much abundant.

If this is level of knowledge of professors in Pakistan..

No wonder Pakistani "nuclear researchers" author books like “Indian Unsafe-guarded Nuclear Program”

Indian nuclear programme has always been plutonium based, It is only for Hydrogen bombs and submarine reactors India dabbled in Uranium.

Where as Pakistan , which is supposed to be an expert in using plutonium, has only tested uranium bombs.

Plutonium- 239 is not found in nature, it has to created from U-238 in a nuclear reactor, the advantage of using plutonium is...

Plutonium has lower critical mass and higher fission probability. For the same yield, Plutonium based bombs are much lighter and smaller than uranium based ones.
 
.
Plutonium nuclear bombs are not much that capable as uranium nuclear bombs my Physics professor toldmme about two days ago.

Pakistan uses uranium while India uses plutonium. Also uranium is expensive and not much abundant.
pakistan uses both.

11 deaths in 4 among a group of 12000 scientists is very low.
indian RAW killed many of its own scientist for sharing information with foreign mostly westeern agencies.
 
.
Contradicting lines.
Haha. Your professor probably doesn't know that all the bombs we tested were plutonium based, even the one in 1974.
Your last few statements are contradicting the statements you have made in the first.

Sorry guys that was a mistake.
I was confused between which country its using which one. After realizing i edited my post but it didn't saved it may be i
If this is level of knowledge of professors in Pakistan..

No wonder Pakistani "nuclear researchers" author books like “Indian Unsafe-guarded Nuclear Program”

Indian nuclear programme has always been plutonium based, It is only for Hydrogen bombs and submarine reactors India dabbled in Uranium.

Where as Pakistan , which is supposed to be an expert in using plutonium, has only tested uranium bombs.

Plutonium- 239 is not found in nature, it has to created from U-238 in a nuclear reactor, the advantage of using plutonium is...

Plutonium has lower critical mass and higher fission probability. For the same yield, Plutonium based bombs are much lighter and smaller than uranium based ones.
I am in matric and they were not teaching us how to make a nuclear bomb out there.
But what i know is uranium is much more efficient than plutonium.

And guys who replied me as i am making contradicting statements i wanna say that i was confused between plutonium and uranium that which country it's using which one i repress than realized that i was wrong i edited but forgot to delete the previous comment. ....
 
.
Sorry guys that was a mistake.
I was confused between which country its using which one. After realizing i edited my post but it didn't saved it may be i

I am in matric and they were not teaching us how to make a nuclear bomb out there.
But what i know is uranium is much more efficient than plutonium.

And guys who replied me as i am making contradicting statements i wanna say that i was confused between plutonium and uranium that which country it's using which one i repress than realized that i was wrong i edited but forgot to delete the previous comment. ....

Wrong Uranium is less efficient than plutonium.

In lay man's terms plutonium is a processed form of uranium. If Uranium is milk, then plutonium will be cheese, i.e 1 Kg of cheese has a much higher calorie content than 1kg of milk.

As explained before Plutonium has lower critical mass, meaning much lower amount of plutonium is needed to sustain a chain reaction.

That is why, plutonium based weapons are much smaller in size and weight.
 
.
Indian Nukes: World’s largest unsafe-unguarded programme, reveals Research Study
Posted By: News Deskon: October 23, 2016
567040d5c46188d02d8b45b3.jpg

Share0
Tweet
Share0
Share0


ISLAMABAD Oct 23 (APP): New ground breaking research carried out by nuclear experts has disclosed that India can produce a maximum of 356 to 492 nuclear weapons, proving that the actual Indian nuclear bomb making capacity is far greater than most current western assessments.

This is the crux of the research carried out by four nuclear researchers in a book “Indian Unsafe-guarded Nuclear Program” co-authored by Adeela Azam, Ahmad Khan, Syed Muhammad Ali and Sameer Ali Khan.

“The research study reveals that India has sufficient material and technical capacity to make up to 356 to 492 nuclear bombs. This work is in contrast to various other earlier studies which have taken a much more modest view of the Indian nuclear bomb making potential,” said the authors, interacting with this scribe while divulging details about their startling study.

The findings of the study also provide food for thought to the member States of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) that they must consider the large and swiftly expanding Indian nuclear bomb making capacity while dealing with New Delhi’s NSG membership case and ensure that the Indian membership of this export control arrangement does not, in any way, help India further expand and accelerate its nuclear weapons program.

The book published by the Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad (ISSI), dilates in threadbare upon the topics like, “Indian Nuclear Energy Needs and Uranium Reserves, Indian Uranium Enrichment Capacity and Future Requirement, Indian Unsafe-guarded Nuclear Reactor Program and Indian Nuclear Reprocessing Program.”

Findings of this book are based on the critical review of hundreds of Indian documents, research studies, budgetary estimates, technical assessments, statements and research by senior Indian nuclear scientists and credible research of leading international nuclear experts, spanning more than six decades.

It also unveils the true size, extent and capabilities of the different aspects of the complex Indian nuclear program, which New Delhi has kept outside the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards and proves that it is the largest and oldest unsafe-guarded nuclear program in the entire developing world and among all the States not party to the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty.

Adeela Azam, Visiting Fellow ISSI, has argued that India’s own mines have sufficient uranium reserves and capacity to run New Delhi’s existing reactors for more than a century. India has produced nuclear fuel beyond the current requirements of its Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors.

Ahmad Khan, Visiting Fellow ISSI, is of the view that India, despite starting its uranium enrichment program much later than Pakistan, has overtaken Islamabad in terms of its total known uranium enrichment capacity.

“Although the world’s spotlight continues to be on the Iranian nuclear program, in reality the Indian uranium enrichment program is perhaps the fastest growing in the World and provides New Delhi with ample Uranium enrichment capacity to not only run nuclear powered ballistic missile submarines but also to build nuclear and thermonuclear weapons,” he said.

Syed Muhammad Ali, Senior Research Fellow Center for International Strategic Studies, offers a new assessment of how many nuclear bombs India can actually make, based on the removal of weapon-grade and reactor-grade plutonium from its nuclear reactors, kept outside IAEA safeguards. Based on its current unsafe-guarded nuclear reactor capacity,

India can make up to 492 plutonium-based nuclear weapons.

“India acquired its nuclear bomb making capacity almost two decades before Pakistan, has consistently enlarged it, making New Delhi’s estimated stocks of weapon-useable nuclear materials, the largest in the entire developing world and the Non-NPT states,” he added.

Sameer Ali Khan, Visiting Fellow ISSI, extensive research on Indian reprocessing facilities reveals that New Delh’s large reactor-grade plutonium stockpile is weapon-useable and it has kept almost its entire known reprocessing capacity outside IAEA safeguards, which is available for military use.

In addition, India is keeping its Fast Breeder reactor program outside the IAEA safeguard for potential military use. Operating at 80% of their known capacities, Indian reprocessing plants could have separated more than one ton of weapon-grade plutonium, sufficient for approximately 96 to 294 nuclear warheads. Moreover, India might have separated over 9 to 12 tons of additional reactor grade plutonium, Sameer said.

Alternatively, assuming a more conservative efficiency of the Indian reprocessing plants of 50% capacity, New Delhi could have separated over 700 kgs of weapon-grade plutonium, sufficient for building 126 to 189 nuclear weapons besides separating over 5 to 7 tons of reactor-grade plutonium, he said.

This additional 5 to 12 tons stock of reactor-grade plutonium is potentially weapon usable and, if not used in Fast Breeder Reactors, could support an additional arsenal of 833 to 3000 reactor grade plutonium based nuclear weapons besides those based on weapons grade plutonium. Even if this unsafe-guarded reactor grade plutonium stocks are used to fuel Indian Fast Breeder Reactors, the ultimate output (weapons grade plutonium) will find

its only utility in nuclear weapons. This estimate does not mean that the estimates presented in earlier chapters are inconsistent with these estimates or incorrect.

The difference in these estimates is because each chapter has looked at the capacities of Indian nuclear facilities rather than actual production, he added.
@Zibago @Zain Malik @Horus @Side-Winder @Oscar @Sarge @Areesh @Windjammer

India has large stocks of unprocessed plutonium which can be converted into weapon grade plutonium. it has been that way for more than 20 years

Seems someone has been taking action against the rogue network.

11 nuclear scientists died in mysterious circumstances in 4 years

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...umstances-in-4-years/articleshow/49272275.cms

11 out of how many ??
 
. . .
Sorry guys, but the credibility of the article has gone for a toss a long time ago, please provide a neutral international source!

Supplementary if this was true, the NSG waiver and proliferation treaty and relationship with the IAEA speaks volumes about India's safeguards in place to protect her nuclear assets.
 
.
Plutonium nuclear bombs are not much that capable as uranium nuclear bombs my Physics professor toldmme about two days ago.

Pakistan uses uranium while India uses plutonium. Also uranium is expensive and not much abundant.

Ur Professor Fooled You !
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom