What's new

Indian navy successfully test-fires BrahMos supersonic cruise missile.

File+photo-2.jpg



vertical+launch+of+Brahmos+from+ship-file+photo.jpg
 
hello Mr.funny man, you've just 700 km km nuke missile but we've 7000 km agni 5....and I don't think there's going to be a nuke war now, to counter pak this missile is more than enough ....it would be deployed along the border and ships also going to on the air .... and I'm Danny sure in Near future the rang would be increased..... you're just a fan boy your generals know the nightmare of this missiles and their speed as no anti missiles going to stop it before its going to hit your bedroom.......
It can only carry a conventional warhead, not a nuclear one. LOL. Boring and only 290km. Our nuclear cruise missile Babur has a 700km range. HMMMM!!!!:devil:
 
Ya but when son comes soon father will fall in the graveyard you fool....
subsonic but pin point accuracy.. supersonic but not pin point accuracy... subsonic but 700 KM range... supersonic but 300 KM rangeSubsonic but stealth ... supersonic but not stealth....when nirbhay will come.. then we will see who is son and who is father.. remember father always comes before son.. :p:wave: anyways congrats..
 
well there's a post two days ago it said that bhuto ( sorry I don't know how to spell his name ) says we'll fight for 1000 for Kashmir.....now that could be one of a reason also we don't have one enemy as u do, we've the monkeys too who jointed with you and speaks for peace but at the same time secretly building up the arms along India border......
Both India ,Pakistan third world EXTREME stupids STOP ARMY, AIRFORCE ,NAVY,machine RACE STOP RACE OF BOMBS IT was india started nuclear race GIVE FOOD GOOD EDUCATION HEALTHCARE infrastructure to your nations war can only destroy you take you back from where both of countries started even much more to the times of mughals or even more then that because its not 65 , 71 its 2012 GOD BLESS BOTH idiots wasting lot on killing machines sinners cursed.
 
To all indian members leave those fellows who doesn't know about brahmos and its capabilities... brahmos is enough to troll them

To all indian members leave those fellows who doesn't know about brahmos and its capabilities... brahmos is enough to troll them
 
It can only carry a conventional warhead, not a nuclear one. LOL. Boring and only 290km. Our nuclear cruise missile Babur has a 700km range. HMMMM!!!!
:devil:

Because your all your major cities are near our border within 290km. Unlike slow Babur, Brahmos is supersonic and hypersonic, it will reach her destination within a blink of an eye. ;)
 
Good achievement! take the development to it's heights we may someday buy some of these.

What would a landlocked country do with a ship to ship missile???

But you could get some of the land launched versions, for use against high value targets.
 
Good achievement! take the development to it's heights we may someday buy some of these.
Anything for Afghan brothers. Just ask what you guys needs for your security and development, Indian govt, will provide it. It will increase our strategic relations too. Without proper security, development can't happen.
 
lol......just wait for Nirbhay cruise missile.

LOL ok and wait for us to have the capability to have babur cruise missile in a submarine.Read below there are speculations that Pakistan is developing a system to use Babur on submarines. Now we can argue if it is true or not, but knowing Pakistan it is probably true.

Experts Wary of Pakistan Nuke Claims

May. 26, 2012 - 10:36AM | By USMAN ANSARI

Days after Pakistan hinted that it possesses a sea-based second nuclear strike capability, Indian Defence Ministry officials remained silent on the matter, and outside observers were skeptical that the Navy had such a capability.

On May 19, the head of the Pakistan Navy, Adm. Asif Sandhila, inaugurated the Headquarters of the Naval Strategic Force Command (NSFC). A press release by the military’s Inter Services Public Relations stated the NSFC “will perform a pivotal role in development and employment of the Naval Strategic Force,” and was “the custodian of the nation’s 2nd strike capability.”

Beyond the announcement, Pakistan’s Navy has said little about the office or about the service’s capabilities.

In February, Sandhila told Defense News that the Pakistan Navy was mindful of India’s plans to complete the sea-based arm of its nuclear triad, and was “taking necessary measures to restore the strategic balance” in the Indian Ocean region.

Christian Le Mière, a research fellow for naval forces and maritime security at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said Pakistan’s sea-based deterrent is “most likely” the widely speculated submarine-launched variant of the Babur/Hatf-7 (Vengeance-7) cruise missile.

“The Babur is already nuclear-capable and is expected to be used on submarines,” he said. “I have not seen verifiable evidence of any tests for a submarine-launched version, but it is perfectly feasible that a [submarine-launched cruise missile] is now available.”

Analyst Usman Shabbir, with the Pakistan Military Consortium think tank, said Pakistan has been working on its sea-based deterrent for some time.

“When the Babur was first revealed in 2005, it was claimed that it is mainly designed to be deployed from submarines. There was at least that speculation,” he said.

The Navy “has pretty good experience in using similar systems; for example, both submarine-launched Harpoon and Exocet [missiles] use a similar system, and [the Navy] has operated both for a long time.”

Shabbir speculated that the Babur/Hatf-7 missiles might be fired from torpedo tubes, similar to UGM-84 Harpoons.

Source: All content © 2012, Gannett Government Media Corporation
 
LOL ok and wait for us to have the capability to have babur cruise missile in a submarine.Read below there are speculations that Pakistan is developing a system to use Babur on submarines. Now we can argue if it is true or not, but knowing Pakistan it is probably true.
Ya definatly :D I would have said knowing China though :P
 
Back
Top Bottom