What's new

Indian Missiles are Superior to Chinese in Quality, Says Experts

Status
Not open for further replies.
“We are totally naked vis-a-vis China, which has an inventory of 200 nuclear bombs, the vast majority of which are giant H-bombs of power equal to three million tons of TNT,” Santhanam told reporters in New Delhi this week.

200 is the number of nukes that China is aimed for India alone, and we do have far more in reserve for USA. :coffee:
 
.
You claim that Chinese nuclear weapons are 50's technology, but you fail deliver any sources.

Now you are linking that news article where it's said that China buys two reactors from Russia. What that has to do with nuclear weapons? India buys nuclear reactors from other countries... this means that Agni V is 50's technology?

Now, post those "media sources" so I can read evidence that Chinese missiles are 50's technology. I'm still waiting.

Have you even read the link:

http://www.defence.pk/forums/chines...ia-build-two-more-nuclear-reactors-china.html

Please read. !!
 
.
200 is the number of nukes that China is aimed for India alone, and we do have far more in reserve for USA. :coffee:
each nuke hits covers about 10 sq km.. so you nuke 2000 sq km and feel happy?
OK. but anyway.. ty to land those nukes on india.. it will never reach .. but the moment your first nuke if fired all you cities will be dust in 10 mins because of superior indian missiles
 
.
Is it because you are all ready to take his place ? :P

Seriously , get a life and stop mocking yourself !

At best you can compare Agni V with Chinese technology of 1970's ... Nothing more :lol:



Mate , you are replying to a troll which doesn't know ABC of a missile even ... Yet he will go all the way to prove that Chinese got this technology from there and there , based on some random articles ... I will be delighted to hear from him , where India got the technology from ...

In the meantime , the country which is now claiming superiority over Beijing :rofl:

India Nuclear Weapons | Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
A top scientist's claim that India's 1998 nuclear test was a failure ...

Kasturiranga Santhanam, the coordinator of India's 1998 nuclear tests, went public with allegations that India's much heralded Pokhran II test of a thermonuclear bomb 11 years ago was actually a fizzle.

“We are totally naked vis-a-vis China, which has an inventory of 200 nuclear bombs, the vast majority of which are giant H-bombs of power equal to three million tons of TNT,” Santhanam told reporters in New Delhi this week.

There is no point.... all that you typed.

We wish Pakistan well... best of luck.
 
.
the only thing 50/50 here is your brains ability to process the info... Agni - V.. CEP is one of the best in this world...
Says who ? You ? :rofl:

There is no point.... all that you typed.

We wish Pakistan well... best of luck.

Ofcourse , since you couldn't comprehend it ... How can you see a point in answering it ? :azn:

OK. but anyway.. ty to land those nukes on india.. it will never reach .. but the moment your first nuke if fired all you cities will be dust in 10 mins because of superior indian missiles

Superiority complex much ? :rofl:
 
. .
each nuke hits covers about 10 sq km.. so you nuke 2000 sq km and feel happy?
OK. but anyway.. ty to land those nukes on india.. it will never reach .. but the moment your first nuke if fired all you cities will be dust in 10 mins because of superior indian missiles

We will hit 200 different targets including the populated areas with infrastructure and military locations with the pinpoint accuracy, to carpet nuke a large nation, you will need more than 20000 nukes, no one in the world has enough nukes for this kind of goal. :coffee:
 
.
Says who ? You ? :rofl:



Ofcourse , since you couldn't comprehend it ... How can you see a point in answering it ? :azn:



Superiority complex much ? :rofl:

We still wish Pakistan well. :laugh:

Bhaijaan.... hamari to aapsi gharelu baat hai. :tup:
 
.
The thing is China has failed to keep "the state secret" on this aspect.... it's an open truth (search the whole internet !), chinese missile are crap.

Like it or not .... reality doesn't change.

Do you understand why USA doesn't complain about chinese missile??

Simply they don't care. And the world knows the reason.

Search the whole internet or search the BR ? :azn: ... Atleast make it clear ...

Yes , the US doesn't give a damn **** about Chinese missiles yet !

China has reportedly developed and tested the world's first anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) called DF-21D, with a maximum range of around 2,700 kilometres (1,700 mi)[9] According to the US Department of Defense. It is estimated to have reached initial operating capability in 2007 or 2008. The US Department of Defense has stated that China has developed and reached initial operating capability [13] of a conventionally-armed[14] high hypersonic[15] land-based anti-ship ballistic missile based on the DF-21. This would be the world's first ASBM and the world's first weapons system capable of targeting a moving aircraft carrier strike group from long-range, land-based mobile launchers. A professor at the U.S. Naval War College says that carrier-killing missiles underscore that the U.S. can no longer assume naval supremacy as it has since the end of World War II. United States Naval Institute in 2009 stated that the warhead is large enough to destroy an aircraft carrier in one hit.The US Navy, after concentrating for a decade on a fleet that could operate in shallow water, in response quickly seemed to change its strategy in favor of a deep sea fleet and defenses against ballistic missiles.[21] The United States Navy has responded by switching its focus from a close blockade force of shallow water vessels to return to building deep water ballistic defense destroyers.
 
.
We will hit 200 different targets including the populated areas with infrastructure and military locations with the pinpoint accuracy, to carpet nuke a large nation, you will need more than 20000 nukes, no one in the world has enough nukes for this kind of goal. :coffee:

ok.. go home and celebrate the "pinpoint" accuracy of chinese missiles. :laugh:
 
.
We will hit 200 different targets including the populated areas with infrastructure and military locations with the pinpoint accuracy, to carpet nuke a large nation, you will need more than 20000 nukes, no one in the world has enough nukes for this kind of goal. :coffee:
but your missiles cant even take off.. as seen from the missile launch of N korea last week which was built by the chinese.
also, as per chinese claim india has no infrastructure.. if you hit india we can also hit china but damage much much more.
 
. .
but your missiles cant even take off.. as seen from the missile launch of N korea last week which was built by the chinese.
also, as per chinese claim india has no infrastructure.. if you hit india we can also hit china but damage much much more.

Nope I think the N Korean missile was Indian.

That is because India's rocket failure rate is 50%, unlike China's 93% success rate.

N Korean gambled on cheaper Indian rockets and it lost the bet.
 
.

Again, what does nuclear reactors have to do with ICBM's. India also buys nuclear reactors from Russia, using your logic this means that Indian missile technology is from 1950's.

I gave you Pentagon report and you give me article about Chinese buying two reactors from Russia.


Where is evidence I asked from you? I still haven't seen it.
 
.
Nope I think the N Korean missile was Indian.

That is because India's rocket failure rate is 50%, unlike China's 93% success rate.

N Korean gambled on cheaper Indian rockets and it lost the bet.

haha good try.. but nope.. china is the only country apart for terorist countries like syria, libya, Pakistan etc that NK has relation with.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom