Hi,
I was not convinced either but this turn of events has put the final nail---.
It could not have happened without the okay from iran---. India could not have taken such a big step without taking into confidence its major ally Iran about kashmir annexation---.
It is simply not possible---.
The kashmir annexation may or may not have been planned a longtime ago but the recent turn of events against iran is a clear sign that iran had its say and approval in it---.
Why---because iran is in dire straits one more time---and when iran is in dire straits---some other muslim nation has to suffer death and destruction---.
India jumped on the opportunity and iran gave the green signal---.
When is Pakistan going to wake up and smell the coffee that when it comes to Muslims of Pakistan and their National Interest, they must be united without any sectarian divide for the National Interest of Pakistan but not at the cost of it.
It is not about sects. It is about National Interest. Again, let me emphasize, Sects must be united towards National Interests not at the cost of it - otherwise it nullifies the very concept of unity.
This is precisely the point I made in my post that the reaction of Sunnis of Iran have never been a consideration for Iran when they make any decisions in their National Interest - nor did the shia of Kashmir make any difference to Iran viz a viz their National Interest in supporting India. The same stands true for the GCC countries.
That the GCC countries have been our biggest supporters whenever we are in trouble is evident by our mutually beneficial history. If going with the Interest of Pakistan means going with GCC and against the interests of Iran, as GCC is our biggest patron, then so be it.
Iran has never let Pakistan get in the way of helping India by handing out its Chabahar port for its base of operations in Afghanistan and obviously Pakistan.
Let me highlight another point here that makes average Pakistanis good intentions towards Iran quite as evident as daylight, we have never tried to instigate sectarian divide there or try to provide patronage to Sunnis of Iran. There is no organized State element within Pakistan which is working to recruit, arm and train Sunnis of Iran to fight for Pakistan within or outside of Iran. Agreed? It's obvious...need I say more? I think the average readers need a bit further expansion.
So let's see now...On the other hand, Pakistan suffers from organized sectarian intervention of a country in the form of recruitment and training of Pakistanis to fight for its interest around the middle east. Any nay Sayers?
This militant element automatically becomes a factor or leverage of internal sectarian divide to keep Pakistan under fear of sectarian violence. This organized militant leverage also played it's part in Pakistan deciding to stay neutral in Yemen for fear of its backlash at the hands of those who look after other interests above Pakistan.
Why do so many of us continue to call Roti ko Chochi?
Is this how any friend of Pakistan would act? Why are we choosing to become hostage to others Interests above those of Pakistan?
Pakistan, it's people and armed forces stand united for the National Interest of no other country but Pakistan. When our friendly countries help us and want us to reciprocate then Pakistan should oblige in its own National Interest so that or friendly countries too can continue to come to our aid in our time of need.
Precisely because of the same reason, if our enemy is facilitated by handing over operation of a key strategic Port just a few kilometers away from Gwadar and physical presence of its operatives like Kulbhushan or enemies of state like Uzmir Balooch then Pakistan should consider it an act of hostility and open threat to its National Interest. Period.
Pakistan Zindabad
.
