Joe Shearer
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,493
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
Can you present some Aryan Invasion theory proofs in this thread???
Can you explain why the skeletons seen in IVC are also matching with the todays people residing there and traditions like bangle wearing girls are still matching with the current Gujarat and Rajasthni traditions.
Problem is there are vast differences between the european thinking and India culture and the problem lies when we look into the history through the perspective of these europeans.
The simple fact that there is no evidence of Aryans (not a race but language speaking people who integrated into native India society) invading native Indians will disprove the theory as a hoax.
I sometimes enter into discussions with the ignorant. I rarely enter into discussions with the grossly ignorant. Consider yourself lucky that this is one of those rare occasions.
These are issues relating to pre-history, that period of time when historical records do not exist. As a result, almost all of Indian pre-history apart from the Indus Valley Civilisation, and the archaeological findings of the material culture prevailing in India around the period of the middle of the second millennium BC happens to be based on linguistics.
Would you understand a linguistic argument?
Further, are you aware that there was no difference between Indians living in any part of India and other Indians living in any other part, after around 10,000 BC? All those who came in, including those whose incursions were recorded historically, have not succeeded in making a difference to the genetic make-up of Indians. Considering the entry of Aryan-language speaking migrants of mixed ethnicity as an issue to be dealt with separately, we have the Persians, the Greeks, the Scythians, the Pahlavans, the Kushana, the Ephthalite Huns, the Tibetans, the Arabs, the Turks, the Afghans....none of them changed the genetic make-up of Indians.
That being the case, it is not surprising that the skeletons found in the ruins are similar to the body types of today's population; they were bound to be, in keeping with the genetic finding that there has been no genetic change since 10,000 BC.
Bangle-wearing girls in that region is as significant as the occurrence of bangle-wearing in our southern or eastern regions. The Gujaratis and Rajasthanis (except the Meenas) are mainly descendants of the Scythians, the Pahlavis and perhaps the Kushana. They hadn't much connection with the IVC.
As far as looking through Indian history not through the eyes of foreigners is concerned, that is the usual complaint of the vastly ignorant: the merely ignorant know that this is an egregious error. Indian historians have proliferated, and an Indian point of view has evolved, several points of view in fact