Indian deputy consul general arrested in US on visa fraud charges

[IndoUS]

Initially I did have a little bit of sympathy with this female diplomat. I thought the public arrest and the body research were a bit over the top (even though it is standard process in the US law enforcement circles). Now more and more truth had come out. It turned out phone calls from the police and summons were ignored by this woman before the arrest.

If she thought she was protected by the diplomatic immunity. She got a wake up come.

Good riddance.

Please post the news report where she ignored the police phone calls because I have been watching CNN and other news channels and they haven't stated anything about it. It would be nice to see these statements.

 

[Indischer]

Some reports are stating she isn't even a diplomat but an employee of the Indian consul in NYC, but US states she doesn't have "full diplomatic immunity" hence her arrest was valid.

Either way in a country where gang-rape of women is a daily occurrence a lot of double-standard and hypocritical attitudes are being shown by the Indian government.

Since shootings are common in US, is it ok if some US diplomats are shot at in India??

Please make some efforts at least to conceal your idiocy!

 

[Bang Galore]

Some reports are stating she isn't even a diplomat but an employee of the Indian consul in NYC, but US states she doesn't have "full diplomatic immunity" hence her arrest was valid.

Either way in a country where gang-rape of women is a daily occurrence a lot of double-standard and hypocritical attitudes are being shown by the Indian government.

...and you are a supposed "analyst" of some "think tank" here? The lady is member of the IFS, makes her a diplomat. If you cannot comprehend the difference between being a diplomat & holding a position that may or may not entail complete diplomatic immunity, you really should find another matter more in your league to discuss.

As for your quip on gang-rapes, it is a bit like suggesting that since the U.S. has a great number of gun deaths anyways, there is no reason for the U.S. to act tough against terrorists or states who might kill U.S. citizens.

 

[A1Kaid]

...and you are a supposed "analyst" of some "think tank" here? The lady is member of the IFS, makes her a diplomat. If you cannot comprehend the difference between being a diplomat & holding a position that may or may not entail complete diplomatic immunity, you really should find another matter more in your league to discuss.

As for your quip on gang-rapes, it is a bit like suggesting that since the U.S. has a great number of gun deaths anyways, there is no reason for the U.S. to act tough against terrorists or states who might kill U.S. citizens.

According to the US she does not have "full diplomatic immunity" only limited immunity and she is considered a low level diplomat, hence her arrest was valid, her treatment is another issue.

 

[IndoUS]

Some reports are stating she isn't even a diplomat but an employee of the Indian consul in NYC, but US states she doesn't have "full diplomatic immunity" hence her arrest was valid.

Either way in a country where gang-rape of women is a daily occurrence a lot of double-standard and hypocritical attitudes are being shown by the Indian government.

So by this reasoning, since bombings are common occurrence in Pakistan already, it if fine for US to perform drone strikes in Pakistan and kill civilians and army men

 

[manlion]

Claims you. India is pretty sure and convinced it is a clear case of Entrapment and conspiracy.

don't go wild with your imagination, this diplomat who is supposed to be made of high Indian caliber , has no integrity, lied and was involve in human trafficking.

If the consul performed an illegal act, US had the choice to revoke her status and deport her back to India.

This illegal act is not part of her consul work, when you choose to live in another country, you abide by that country's laws and adapt to it's culture. This is an embrassment , so you rather blame US and not the diplomat

 

[Indischer]

According to the US she does not have "full diplomatic immunity" only limited immunity and she is considered a low level diplomat, hence her arrest was valid, her treatment is another issue.

Fine, so how high level a diplomat was Raymond Davis?

Her treatment aside, your insensitivity on rapes is another issue.

 

[Bang Galore]

According to the US she does not have "full diplomatic immunity" only limited immunity and she is considered a low level diplomat, hence her arrest was valid, her treatment is another issue.

That does not make her any less of a diplomat. After all the U.S. has plenty such career officers in India.

Her arrest may or may not have been valid, still stupid though. It is her treatment that has got everyone's goat.

 

[IndoUS]

don't go wild with your imagination, this diplomat who is supposed to be made of high Indian caliber stuf, has no integrity, lied and was involve in human trafficking.



This illegal act is not part of her consul work, when you choose to live in another country, you abide by that country's laws and adapt to it's culture. This is an embrassment , so you rather blame US and not the diplomat

Which is not even proven yet so you are also assuming.

 

[manlion]

India stands firm, shifts Devyani to UN, accuses US of trapping her
CNN-IBN | 19-Dec-2013

http://m.ibnlive.in.com/news/india-...o-un-accuses-us-of-trapping-her/440389-3.html

 

[sincity]

Which is not even proven yet so you are also assuming.

The law enforcement can't arrest someone base on assumption without justifiable cause with the backing of some form of evidences.

 

[IndoUS]

The law enforcement can't arrest someone base on assumption without justifiable cause with the backing of some form of evidences.

Cause, but not proof otherwise she wouldn't have gotten bail so quick. The proof is questionable, that is why the Judge put out the bail. If they had legitimate proof she would not have gotten a bail.

 

[sincity]

Cause, but not proof otherwise she wouldn't have gotten bail so quick. The proof is questionable, that is why the Judge put out the bail. If they had legitimate proof she would not have gotten a bail.

Even someone accuse of murder get bail if the judge find the defend not a fly risk. Posting bail can't determine whether a suspect guilty of a crime.

Posting bail just mean a defendant can be free but require to appear in court to defense his case against the state, able to post bail not mean one is guilty or not guilty of a crime.

 

[IndoUS]

Even someone accuse of murder get bail if the judge find the defend not a fly risk. Posting bail can't determine whether a suspect guilty of a crime.

Again the word being accused, they still haven't proven it which means the person might or might not have done it.

 

[sincity]

Again the word being accused, they still haven't proven it which means the person might or might not have done it.

True, innocent till proven guilty in the court of law. The law enforcement have the duty to arrest someone base on circumstantial evident or hard fact evident. No law enforcement can arrest anyone base on assumption of guilt.